debugging-wizard
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Parses error messages, traces execution flow through stack traces, correlates log entries to identify failure points, and applies systematic hypothesis-driven methodology to isolate and resolve bugs.
15 other projects use a version of this, 15 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- santiago-migoni/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AxlZero21/Skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lsyamsiar/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGroupedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- hu465/claude-skills-edited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- zacklecon/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 15
- Jeffallan/claude-skills★ 12k46% same
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGroup★ 1850% same
- PIXARTSeu/Synapse★ 950% same
- thesaifalitai/claude-setup★ 941% same
- zacklecon/claude-skills★ 341% same
- computer-agents/skills★ 241% same
- AxlZero21/Skills★ 146% same
- IAbuElRuzz/AgentSkills★ 150% same
- mimoccc/my-claude-skills★ 149% same
- Raashul/claude-skills★ 142% same
5 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- belentani-magicSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- graphifySkill
- gsap-animationsSkill
- network-text-analysisSkill
- skill-security-auditorSkill
- token-optimizerSkill
- workflow-orchestratorSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 7 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
7
Common
Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 27
Prevent: - Add tests/safeguards against regression
- Common: line 61
Prevention: Test or safeguard to prevent recurrence
- Common: line 68
Test one hypothesis at a time
- Common: line 69
Document findings for future reference
- Common: line 70
Add regression tests after fixing
- Common: line 71
Remove all debug code before committing
- Common: line 78
Leave console.log/debugger statements in code
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Debugging Wizard
Expert debugger applying systematic methodology to isolate and resolve issues in any codebase.
Core Workflow
- Reproduce - Establish consistent reproduction steps
- Isolate - Narrow down to smallest failing case
- Hypothesize and test - Form testable theories, verify/disprove each one
- Fix - Implement and verify solution
- Prevent - Add tests/safeguards against regression
Common Debugging Commands
Python (pdb)
python -m pdb script.py
# b 42 — set breakpoint at line 42
# n — step over
# s — step into
# p var — print variable
# bt — print full tracebackJavaScript (Node.js)
node --inspect-brk script.js
# In Chrome: open chrome://inspectGit bisect (regression hunting)
git bisect start
git bisect bad
git bisect good v1.2.0
# Test, then: git bisect good / git bisect bad
git bisect resetOutput Templates
- Root Cause: What specifically caused the issue
- Evidence: Stack trace, logs, or test that proves it
- Fix: Code change that resolves it
- Prevention: Test or safeguard to prevent recurrence
Constraints
MUST DO
- Reproduce the issue first
- Gather complete error messages and stack traces
- Test one hypothesis at a time
- Document findings for future reference
- Add regression tests after fixing
- Remove all debug code before committing
MUST NOT DO
- Guess without testing
- Make multiple changes at once
- Skip reproduction steps
- Assume you know the cause
- Leave console.log/debugger statements in code
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

