agentleFS
belentani7belentani7/claude-skills-pack/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md

deep-research

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Investigación profunda y autónoma sobre cualquier tema. Paraleliza búsquedas, sintetiza fuentes, genera reportes con citas. Usa para preguntas que requieren múltiples fuentes y análisis profundo.

196 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use community-led-growth, ph-community-outreach and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • nicepkgSkill

    community-led-growth

    Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    ph-community-outreach

    Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • W-MoorerSkill

    academic-paper-reviewer

    Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • W-MoorerSkill

    academic-pipeline

    Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • xfstudioSkill

    micro-saas-launcher

    Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • stophobiaSkill

    surprise-me

    Create a delightful, unexpected "wow" experience for the user by dynamically discovering and creatively combining other enabled skills. Triggers when the user says "surprise me" or any request expressing a desire for an unexpected creative showcase. Also triggers when the user is bored, wants inspiration, or asks for "something interesting".

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +4 more from nicepkg
  • +1 more from W-Moorer

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Deep Research - Investigación Autónoma

Flujo de Investigación

Pregunta del usuario
    ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│  1. PLANIFICAR                      │
│  - Descomponer en sub-preguntas     │
│  - Identificar fuentes necesarias   │
│  - Crear plan de investigación      │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
    ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│  2. INVESTIGAR (paralelo)           │
│  - Subagent 1: Fuentes primarias   │
│  - Subagent 2: Fuentes secundarias │
│  - Subagent 3: Datos/recursos      │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
    ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│  3. SINTETIZAR                      │
│  - Cruzar fuentes                  │
│  - Identificar consenso/conflicto  │
│  - Generar insights                │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
    ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│  4. REPORTAR                        │
│  - Estructura clara                │
│  - Citas verificadas               │
│  - Conclusiones accionables        │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
    ↓
Reporte completo

Template de Reporte

# [Tema de Investigación]

## Resumen Ejecutivo
[2-3 parágrafos con los hallazgos principales]

## Metodología
- Fuentes consultadas: [lista]
- Período de investigación: [fechas]
- Criterios de inclusión: [criterios]

## Hallazgos Principales

### 1. [Hallazgo 1]
[Detalle con citas]

### 2. [Hallazgo 2]
[Detalle con citas]

### 3. [Hallazgo 3]
[Detalle con citas]

## Análisis Comparativo
| Aspecto | Opción A | Opción B | Opción C |
|---------|----------|----------|----------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

## Recomendaciones
1. [Recomendación 1]
2. [Recomendación 2]
3. [Recomendación 3]

## Fuentes
- [Fuente 1](url)
- [Fuente 2](url)

Ejecución

async def deep_research(question, depth="standard"):
    """Ejecuta investigación profunda"""
    
    # 1. Planificar
    plan = await plan_research(question)
    
    # 2. Investigar en paralelo
    results = await asyncio.gather(*[
        research_source(source) for source in plan.sources
    ])
    
    # 3. Sintetizar
    synthesis = synthesize_results(results)
    
    # 4. Generar reporte
    report = generate_report(synthesis, plan)
    
    return report

Calidad de Fuentes

SOURCE_PRIORITY = {
    "primary": ["docs oficiales", "papers peer-reviewed", "docs técnicas"],
    "secondary": ["blogs técnicos", "documentación de herramientas", "tutoriales"],
    "tertiary": ["foros", "stackoverflow", "reddit"],
}

def evaluate_source(url, content):
    """Evalúa la confiabilidad de una fuente"""
    score = 0
    
    # Dominio confiable
    if any(d in url for d in ["github.com", "docs.", "arxiv.org"]):
        score += 30
    
    # Contenido reciente
    if is_recent(content):
        score += 20
    
    # Tiene citas/referencias
    if has_citations(content):
        score += 20
    
    # Autor verificable
    if has_author(content):
        score += 15
    
    return score

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.