agentleFS
bdunn313bdunn313/repolab/.agents/skills/spec/SKILL.md

spec

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Create, amend, or backprop bugs into SPEC.md at repo root. Sole mutator of the project spec. Triggers when the user asks to write a spec, start a new spec, distill a spec from existing code, add invariants, amend sections (§G, §C, §I, §V, §T, §B), or record a bug via backprop. Common phrasings: "write the spec for...", "new spec", "bug: ...", "amend §V.3", "distill spec from code", "spec this idea". Reads and follows FORMAT.md for the caveman encoding rules and pipe-table shape of §T and §B.

168 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ios-clean, ios-fix and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-clean

    Remove the DebugBridge SPM package and all #if DEBUG wiring from an iOS app. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Saqlain-811Skill

    ios-fix

    Autonomous iOS bug fixer. (gstack)

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • bastosSkill

    ios-design-review

    Review iOS app UI/UX design quality using Apple's design principles and the Liquid Glass-era design language from WWDC25/26. Use when asked for a design review, UX critique, visual design assessment, or evaluation of an app's interface quality, design intent, alignment with the new Apple design system, or usability. Triggers: "design review", "UX review", "visual design critique", "review the UI", "does this design work", "evaluate this interface", "design feedback", "Liquid Glass review".

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    plan-tune

    Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • timurgaleevSkill

    document-generate

    Generate missing docs for a feature, module or project as tutorials, how-tos, reference and explanation.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    landing-report

    Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Saqlain-811
  • +3 more from ShreyRavi

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 144 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read FORMAT.md at repo root if not already loaded.

    line 16
  2. Very specific:

    Write to SPEC.md. Show user full file.

    line 53
  3. Distinctive:

    If fix also changes behavior → add/update §T rows.

    line 71
  4. Distinctive:

    Read that section. Show current.

    line 80
  5. Distinctive:

    Never silently rewrite sections user did not name.

    line 82
  6. Distinctive:

    No sub-agents. Main thread writes.

    line 93
  7. Distinctive:

    No dashboards, no logs, no state files beyond SPEC.md itself.

    line 94
  8. Distinctive:

    No auto-build after spec. User invokes build explicitly.

    line 95

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 144 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

spec — spec mutator

Read FORMAT.md at repo root if not already loaded. Caveman skill applies to all writes here.

DISPATCH

Inspect user request and project state:

  1. No SPEC.md at repo root AND args describe idea → NEW
  2. No SPEC.md AND from-code in args → DISTILL
  3. SPEC.md exists AND args start bug: → BACKPROP
  4. SPEC.md exists AND args start amend → AMEND
  5. SPEC.md exists, no args → ask user which mode

INPUTS — spec is the sole mutator

The other verbs produce material; spec writes it. Ingest their handoff blocks into the right section, show a diff, write on OK:

  • grill → sharpened §G + §C
  • research → §R rows (add the §R section if absent)
  • review → drafted §V lines + the risk verdict
  • deepen → §I/§V/§T amendments

⊥ rewrite a section the handoff did not name. Sectioned ownership (see FORMAT.md).

NEW — idea → spec

Input: user idea. If it arrived fuzzy, prefer running grill first.

Steps:

  1. Extract goal (1 line, caveman). → §G.
  2. List constraints user stated or implied. → §C.
  3. List external surfaces user named. → §I.
  4. §R only if research ran — else omit the section (right-size).
  5. Propose initial invariants. → §V (numbered V1…).
  6. Break goal into ordered tasks. → §T pipe table, all status ., ids T1…
  7. §B section with header row only (id|date|cause|fix).

Write to SPEC.md. Show user full file. Ask: "spec OK? /review if high-blast-radius, else /build."

DISTILL — code → spec

Walk repo. Produce §G (infer from README/package.json/main entry), §C (infer from stack), §I (enumerate public APIs/CLIs/configs), §V (derive from tests and assertions), §T (one task per known TODO or missing test), §B (empty).

Caveman everywhere. Flag uncertain items with ? in text so user can confirm.

BACKPROP — bug → §B + §V

Input: bug: <description>.

Steps:

  1. Parse bug description.
  2. Find root cause (read relevant code).
  3. Decide: would a new invariant catch recurrence? If yes → draft V<next>.
  4. Append §B row: B<next>|<date>|<cause>|V<N>.
  5. Append new invariant to §V.
  6. If fix also changes behavior → add/update §T rows.
  7. Show diff. Apply only on user OK.

Rule: every bug gets a §B entry. Invariant optional but preferred.

AMEND — targeted edit

Input: amend §V.3 or amend §T etc.

Read that section. Show current. Ask user what changes. Write. Show diff.

Never silently rewrite sections user did not name.

OUTPUT RULES

  • Caveman format per FORMAT.md.
  • Preserve identifiers, paths, code verbatim.
  • Numbering monotonic — never reuse §V.N or §B.N.
  • §T row cites column ! list §V/§I deps: T5|.|impl auth mw|V2,I.api.

NON-GOALS

  • No sub-agents. Main thread writes.
  • No dashboards, no logs, no state files beyond SPEC.md itself.
  • No auto-build after spec. User invokes build explicitly.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.