agentleFS
bdunn313bdunn313/repolab/.agents/skills/caveman/SKILL.md

caveman

Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Caveman encoding for SPEC.md and spec-adjacent writes. Loaded by /spec, /build, /check. Cuts tokens ~75% vs prose while staying precise. Triggers on any write to SPEC.md or when user says "caveman", "compress this", "be brief".

184 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use addskill, apply-firmware and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ryanportfolioSkill

    addskill

    Create, import, update, or install repo or personal skills: runtime ownership, resources, discovery checks.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • ryanportfolioSkill

    apply-firmware

    Bring current folder (plain folder, existing repo, old or partial firmware copy) up to full Harness Firmware in place. Mirror external repo → adopt-repo.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +10 more from ryanportfolio

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 120 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Does NOT apply to code, error strings, commit messages, PR descriptions.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    No hedging (skip "might", "perhaps", "could be worth").

    line 20
  3. Distinctive:

    Commit message → normal English (git readers expect it).

    line 113
  4. Distinctive:

    If cutting a word loses a fact, keep it.

    line 118

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 120 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

caveman — spec encoding

Applies to SPEC.md writes, spec-referencing prose, backprop entries. Does NOT apply to code, error strings, commit messages, PR descriptions.

GRAMMAR

  • Drop articles (a, an, the).
  • Drop filler (just, really, basically, simply, actually).
  • Drop aux verbs where fragment works (is, are, was, were, being).
  • Drop pleasantries.
  • No hedging (skip "might", "perhaps", "could be worth").
  • Fragments fine.
  • Short synonyms: fix > implement, big > extensive, run > execute.

SYMBOLS

Prefer over words:

→   leads to / becomes / on <x>
∴   therefore / fix
∀   for all / every
∃   exists / some
!   must / required
?   may / optional / unknown
⊥   never / forbidden / nil
≠   not equal
∈   in
∉   not in
≤   at most
≥   at least
&   and
|   or
§   section reference

PRESERVE VERBATIM

Never compress:

  • Code blocks, snippets, one-liners with backticks.
  • Paths: src/auth/mw.go.
  • URLs.
  • Identifiers: function names, variable names, env vars.
  • Numbers and versions.
  • Error message strings.
  • SQL, regex, JSON, YAML.
  • Quoted strings.

SHAPES

Invariant:

V<n>: <subject> <relation> <condition>
V1: ∀ req → auth check before handler
V2: token expiry ≤ current_time → reject

Bug row (pipe table under §B):

id|date|cause|fix
B1|2026-04-20|token `<` not `≤`|V2

Task row (pipe table under §T):

id|status|task|cites
T3|x|add auth mw|V1,I.api

Status: x done, ~ wip, . todo. Escape literal | as \|.

Interface:

<kind>: <name> → <shape>
api: POST /x → 200 {id:string}
cmd: `foo bar <arg>` → stdout JSON
env: FOO_KEY ! set

EXAMPLES

Bad:

The system should ensure that every incoming request is properly authenticated before being forwarded to its corresponding handler function.

Good:

V1: ∀ req → auth check before handler

Bad:

We discovered that the token expiration check in the middleware was using a strict less-than comparison operator, which meant tokens were being rejected at the exact moment of their expiry.

Good:

B1: token < not ≤ → reject @ expiry boundary.

Bad:

The POST endpoint at /x accepts a JSON body and returns a 200 response with an object containing the created id.

Good:

api: POST /x → 200 {id}

BOUNDARIES

  • User asks for prose explanation → switch to normal English.
  • Spec documents for external review (RFC, pitch) → normal English.
  • Commit message → normal English (git readers expect it).
  • Diff comment in code → normal English.

WHEN UNSURE

If cutting a word loses a fact, keep it. Caveman is compression, not amputation.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.