implement-plan
Skill34 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub
Execute an approved implementation plan from the configured plans
28 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- korcekj/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- spalladino/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- TylerAkins/ai-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- insapption-projects/claude-agent-team-startertheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- paultyng/skill-issuetheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Pablomg02/pamaga-agent-toolkittheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use iterate-plan, fix-bug and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
corticalstackSkilliterate-plan
Revise an existing implementation plan in flow/plans/ based on feedback, researching when needed. Explicit-only; run only when invoked via /iterate-plan or explicitly asked.
Also in 5 projects that use this
JetBrainsSkillfix-bug
End-to-end bug fix workflow for the Exposed project. Accepts a GitHub issue (#NUMBER), YouTrack issue (EXPOSED-NUMBER), or YouTrack URL (https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/EXPOSED-NUMBER). Fetches the issue, creates a failing reproducer test, commits on a new branch, implements the fix, validates, and opens a PR. Use this skill whenever the user wants to fix a bug from an issue tracker, mentions a EXPOSED issue number, or references a GitHub issue to fix.
Also in 3 projects that use this
NVIDIASkillreview-code
Review a code repository for concrete issues in correctness, robustness, security, maintainability, tests, and integration. Use for repository-wide or focused code review where practical engineering judgment and strict scope control matter.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillcreate-pr
Create pull requests following Sentry conventions. Use when opening PRs, writing PR descriptions, or preparing changes for review. Follows Sentry's code review guidelines.
Also in 5 projects that use this
ElasticSkillcreate-skill
Interactively create a new Claude Code skill and add it to the elastic-docs-skills catalog. Use when the user wants to generate a new skill, scaffold a slash command, or build automation for docs tasks.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkilldiagnosing-bugs
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions28 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- ConsolaDev/Consola★ 120% same
- corticalstack/flow★ 160% same
Wrote their own version · 26
- penpot/penpot★ 62ksame name
- ChatbotXIO/ChatbotX★ 1.1ksame name
- OpenFn/lightning★ 321same name
- maxedapps/agent-skills★ 59same name
- hawkyre/hawk-skills★ 30same name
- mhylle/claude-skills-collection★ 20same name
- L-X-T/ng-agentic-skills★ 13same name
- paultyng/skill-issue★ 8same name
- Akindu23/my-agent-skills★ 4same name
- geemus/hax-yax★ 4same name
16 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- hooks/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- tasks/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- clean-commentsSkill
- raise-prSkill
- configureSkill
- initSkill
- migrateSkill
- pathsSkill
- create-adrSkill
- extract-adrsSkill
- review-adrSkill
- analyse-design-gapsSkill
- inventory-designSkill
- describe-prSkill
- respond-to-prSkill
- review-prSkill
- create-noteSkill
- create-planSkill
- review-planSkill
- stress-test-planSkill
- validate-planSkill
- conduct-spikeSkill
- research-codebaseSkill
- research-issueSkill
- research-topicSkill
- commitSkill
- visualiseSkill
- create-work-itemSkill
- extract-work-itemsSkill
- list-work-itemsSkill
- refine-work-itemSkill
- rekey-work-itemsSkill
- review-work-itemSkill
- stress-test-work-itemSkill
- sync-work-items-recoverySkill
- sync-work-itemsSkill
- update-work-itemSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
26 rules. 0 are common, 23 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 28 edited versions we read keep these.
23
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 17
If no "Agent Names" section appears above, use these defaults: accelerator:reviewer, accelerator:codebase-locator, …
- Distinctive: line 31
When given a plan path:
- Distinctive: line 33
Read the plan completely and check for any existing checkmarks (- [x])
- Distinctive: line 34
Read the original work item and all files mentioned in the plan
- Distinctive: line 35
Read files fully: - never use limit/offset parameters, you need complete context
- Distinctive: line 38
Create a todo list to track your progress
- Distinctive: line 39
Start implementing if you understand what needs to be done
- Distinctive: line 41
If no plan path provided, ask for one.
- Distinctive: line 47
Follow the plan's intent while adapting to what you find
- Distinctive: line 49
Verify your work makes sense in the broader codebase context
- Distinctive: line 50
Update checkboxes in the plan as you complete sections
- Distinctive: line 52
When things don't match the plan exactly, think about why and communicate clearly.
- Distinctive: line 55
If you encounter a mismatch:
- Distinctive: line 57
STOP and think deeply about why the plan can't be followed
- Distinctive: line 70
After implementing a phase:
- Very specific: line 73
Run the success criteria checks (usually ./go covers everything)
- Distinctive: line 75
Update your progress in both the plan and your todos
- Distinctive: line 76
Check off completed items in the plan file itself using Edit
- Distinctive: line 78
Don't let verification interrupt your flow - batch it at natural stopping points.
- Very specific: line 81
Validate the frontmatter: after writing, run corpus frontmatter validate over the plan file whose checkboxes you just updated:
- Distinctive: line 88
If it exits non-zero, the plan violates the canonical frontmatter standard.
- Distinctive: line 94
When something isn't working as expected:
- Distinctive: line 97
Consider if the codebase has evolved since the plan was written
- Distinctive: line 100
Use sub-tasks sparingly - mainly for targeted debugging or exploring unfamiliar territory.
- Distinctive: line 105
If the plan has existing checkmarks:
- Distinctive: line 109
Verify previous work only if something seems off
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 28 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Implement Plan
!accelerator config context --skill implement-plan --fail-safe
!accelerator config agents --fail-safe
If no "Agent Names" section appears above, use these defaults: accelerator:reviewer, accelerator:codebase-locator, accelerator:codebase-analyser, accelerator:codebase-pattern-finder, accelerator:documents-locator, accelerator:documents-analyser, accelerator:web-search-researcher.
Plans directory: !accelerator config path plans --fail-safe
You are tasked with implementing an approved technical plan from the configured plans directory (shown above). These plans contain phases with specific changes and success criteria.
Getting Started
When given a plan path:
- Read the plan completely and check for any existing checkmarks (- [x])
- Read the original work item and all files mentioned in the plan
- Read files fully - never use limit/offset parameters, you need complete context
- Think deeply about how the pieces fit together
- Create a todo list to track your progress
- Start implementing if you understand what needs to be done
If no plan path provided, ask for one.
Implementation Philosophy
Plans are carefully designed, but reality can be messy. Your job is to:
- Follow the plan's intent while adapting to what you find
- Implement each phase fully before moving to the next
- Verify your work makes sense in the broader codebase context
- Update checkboxes in the plan as you complete sections
When things don't match the plan exactly, think about why and communicate clearly. The plan is your guide, but your judgment matters too.
If you encounter a mismatch:
- STOP and think deeply about why the plan can't be followed
- Present the issue clearly:
Issue in Phase [N]: Expected: [what the plan says] Found: [actual situation] Why this matters: [explanation] How should I proceed?
Verification Approach
After implementing a phase:
- Pause and let me review all the changes you have made
- Run the success criteria checks (usually
./gocovers everything) - Fix any issues before proceeding
- Update your progress in both the plan and your todos
- Check off completed items in the plan file itself using Edit
Don't let verification interrupt your flow - batch it at natural stopping points.
Validate the frontmatter: after writing, run corpus frontmatter
validate over the plan file whose checkboxes you just updated:
accelerator corpus frontmatter validate --file <path>If it exits non-zero, the plan violates the canonical frontmatter standard; report the emitted violation and fix the frontmatter before completing.
If You Get Stuck
When something isn't working as expected:
- First, make sure you've read and understood all the relevant code
- Consider if the codebase has evolved since the plan was written
- Present the mismatch clearly and ask for guidance
Use sub-tasks sparingly - mainly for targeted debugging or exploring unfamiliar territory.
Resuming Work
If the plan has existing checkmarks:
- Trust that completed work is done
- Pick up from the first unchecked item
- Verify previous work only if something seems off
Remember: You're implementing a solution, not just checking boxes. Keep the end goal in mind and maintain forward momentum.
!accelerator config instructions implement-plan --fail-safe
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

