create-note
Skill34 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub
Interactively capture a short-form note. Use when jotting down
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kriscard/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- braincandy-parallel/tamarindos-workflow-kittheir own version, first seen Sep 18, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- kriscard/Skills★ 15same name
- braincandy-parallel/tamarindos-workflow-kit★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- hooks/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- tasks/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- clean-commentsSkill
- raise-prSkill
- configureSkill
- initSkill
- migrateSkill
- pathsSkill
- create-adrSkill
- extract-adrsSkill
- review-adrSkill
- analyse-design-gapsSkill
- inventory-designSkill
- describe-prSkill
- respond-to-prSkill
- review-prSkill
- create-planSkill
- implement-planSkill
- review-planSkill
- stress-test-planSkill
- validate-planSkill
- conduct-spikeSkill
- research-codebaseSkill
- research-issueSkill
- research-topicSkill
- commitSkill
- visualiseSkill
- create-work-itemSkill
- extract-work-itemsSkill
- list-work-itemsSkill
- refine-work-itemSkill
- rekey-work-itemsSkill
- review-work-itemSkill
- stress-test-work-itemSkill
- sync-work-items-recoverySkill
- sync-work-itemsSkill
- update-work-itemSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 35
When this command is invoked:
- Very specific: line 66
When the user names a related artifact, record it under relates_to by default.
- Very specific: line 75
Treat any non-affirmative or unclear answer as "related".
- Very specific: line 87
Collision handling (auto-disambiguate): if that path already exists (a same-day, same-topic note), probe <slug>-2.md, then <slug>-3.md, … …
- Distinctive: line 129
Create the notes directory if it does not exist.
- Very specific: line 130
Write the file to the path derived in Step 2, with the substituted frontmatter and the note body beneath the H1 (# <title>).
- Distinctive: line 145
Validate the frontmatter: after writing, run
- Distinctive: line 151
If it exits non-zero, the note violates the canonical frontmatter standard.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Create Note
!accelerator config context --skill create-note --fail-safe
!accelerator config agents --fail-safe
Notes directory: !accelerator config path notes --fail-safe
Note Template
The template below defines the frontmatter every note must carry. Read it now — use it as the structure you populate in the Write step.
!accelerator config template note --fail-safe
You are tasked with capturing a short-form note — an observation, insight, or strategy snippet that does not warrant a research document, plan, or ADR. This is a lightweight, in-the-moment capture: elicit the note in a single round-trip, then write it. Do not run multi-agent research or a lengthy refinement loop.
Step 0: Parameter Check
When this command is invoked:
- If an argument was provided, treat it as the note's topic. Do not re-prompt for a topic — proceed straight to eliciting the note body, any optional tags, and an optional related artifact (see Step 1).
- If no argument was provided, respond with:
What would you like to note? Give me a short topic and the note itself; tags
and a related work item or plan are optional.Then wait for the user's reply. This greeting is the Step 1 elicitation prompt — do not issue a second prompt before the user responds.
Step 1: Elicit the Note
Gather, in a single compact exchange:
- Topic — a short subject line for the note (skip if supplied as the argument).
- Body — the note's content: the observation, insight, or snippet.
- Tags (optional) — clearly marked optional.
- Related artifact (optional) — a work item or plan the note relates to, clearly marked optional.
Aim for one round-trip. Do not interrogate the user across multiple turns.
Linkage
When the user names a related artifact, record it under relates_to by
default. Record it under parent only when the user confirms that the
artifact owns the note. Never infer ownership. Ask a neutral question that
explains the distinction in plain terms and defaults to relates_to:
Does <artifact> own this note as its parent, or is it just related? [owns / related]Treat any non-affirmative or unclear answer as "related". Never write source
or derived_from — those keys belong to the artifact extracted from a note,
not to the note itself.
Step 2: Derive the Filename
- Run
accelerator corpus metadata deriveto obtain the current date/time, revision, and repository name. - Build the path
<notes_dir>/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic-slug>.md, where the date is theCurrent Date/Time (UTC):date portion and<topic-slug>is a meaningful kebab-case summary of the topic — condense and normalise it, never a raw passthrough of the input, and never empty. - Collision handling (auto-disambiguate): if that path already exists (a
same-day, same-topic note), probe
<slug>-2.md, then<slug>-3.md, … and write to the first index that does not yet exist. Do not overwrite and do not abort — the just-elicited note must be preserved.
Step 3: Populate frontmatter
Substitute every field below into the template's frontmatter block, using the helper output from Step 2:
type:←noteid:← the final filename stem (the path from Step 2 without.md), quoted as a YAML stringtitle:← a concise title for the notedate:← theCurrent Date/Time (UTC):valueauthor:← the author resolved per the standard chain (config → VCS user → prompt)producer:←create-notestatus:←capturedtopic:← the note's topictags:← the supplied tags as a YAML array ([]when none)revision:← theCurrent Revision:valuerepository:← theRepository Name:valuelast_updated:← the sameCurrent Date/Time (UTC):valuelast_updated_by:← the same value resolved forauthorschema_version:←1(bare integer)
The typed-linkage keys are omit-when-empty: write each only when it has a value, and omit the key entirely otherwise.
parent:← the owning artifact as a typed-linkage ref ("work-item:NNNN"); fill only when the user confirms that artifact owns the note, otherwise omit the key.relates_to:← list of typed-linkage refs to related artifacts (["work-item:NNNN", ...]); fill when the user names a related artifact, otherwise omit the key.
This skill never writes source or derived_from: those keys are owned by the
artifact extracted from a note, not by the note.
Step 4: Write the Note
- Create the notes directory if it does not exist.
- Write the file to the path derived in Step 2, with the substituted
frontmatter and the note body beneath the H1 (
# <title>). - Print a confirmation naming the literal path written:
Note created: <notes_dir>/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.mdOn a disambiguated write, show the qualified slug and point at the existing note so both files are actionable:
Note created: <final-path> (an earlier note on this topic exists at <first-path>; this one was written as <slug>-N.md)Validate the frontmatter: after writing, run
accelerator corpus frontmatter validate --file <notes_dir>/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.mdIf it exits non-zero, the note violates the canonical frontmatter standard; report the emitted violation and fix the frontmatter before completing.
!accelerator config instructions create-note --fail-safe
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

