implement-plan
Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Executes the approved implementation plan file-by-file, following the project's coding standards. Only runs after plan-feature has been approved. Reports progress after each logical unit. Step 4 of the dev-workflow.
28 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- korcekj/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- spalladino/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- TylerAkins/ai-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- paultyng/skill-issuetheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Pablomg02/pamaga-agent-toolkittheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- mhylle/claude-skills-collectiontheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use iterate-plan, validate-plan and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
corticalstackSkilliterate-plan
Revise an existing implementation plan in flow/plans/ based on feedback, researching when needed. Explicit-only; run only when invoked via /iterate-plan or explicitly asked.
Also in 5 projects that use this
shawn-dumasSkillvalidate-plan
Validate an orchestration plan after pre-flight certification. Runs adversarial review, deep review (verify prompt data against codebase), and PoC gate for risky approaches. Auto-invoked by orchestrate-* skills at Step 8.
Also in 4 projects that use this
parcadeiSkilldescribe-pr
Generate comprehensive PR descriptions following repository templates
Also in 4 projects that use this
joshuaalpuertoSkillresearch-codebase
Conducts structured research across a codebase to answer questions about architecture, components, and data flow. Use when investigating how code works, where functionality lives, or how systems interact. Decomposes questions, runs parallel investigations, synthesizes findings with file:line references, and produces persistent research documents.
Also in 4 projects that use this
JetBrainsSkillcreate-plan
Research the codebase and create an implementation plan with architecture notes, design document, and track decomposition. Use when starting a new feature or large change.
Also in 8 projects that use this
JetBrainsSkillreview-plan
Manually re-run the autonomous plan review (Phase 2 — consistency + structural). The same review runs automatically as the first phase of /execute-tracks; this command is for re-runs after inline replanning or whenever the plan needs explicit re-validation. TRIGGER when: user asks to re-validate the plan after inline replanning; user requests explicit plan review outside /execute-tracks. SKIP: /execute-tracks already running State 0 in this session (autonomous Phase 2 path will fire) — do not double-run.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +1 more from JetBrains
Other versions28 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 28
- penpot/penpot★ 62ksame name
- ChatbotXIO/ChatbotX★ 1.1ksame name
- OpenFn/lightning★ 321same name
- maxedapps/agent-skills★ 59same name
- atomicinnovation/accelerator★ 34same name
- hawkyre/hawk-skills★ 30same name
- mhylle/claude-skills-collection★ 20same name
- L-X-T/ng-agentic-skills★ 13same name
- paultyng/skill-issue★ 8same name
- Akindu23/my-agent-skills★ 4same name
18 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- create-prSkill
- delete-branchSkill
- dev-workflowSkill
- fix-planSkill
- implement-fixSkill
- init-referencesSkill
- merge-mainSkill
- plan-featureSkill
- read-referencesSkill
- test-lintSkill
- update-referencesSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 28 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
If the plan is not approved, do NOT proceed — re-run /plan-feature
- Distinctive: line 32
Implement ONLY what the approved plan lists: No additions, no refactors, no "while I was in there" improvements.
- Distinctive: line 38
Stop and report: if you discover a problem not in the plan — do NOT silently work around it.
- Distinctive: line 39
NOT silently work around it.
- Distinctive: line 47
Before writing a single line, read back the approved plan and output:
- Distinctive: line 63
If the file already exists, read it fully before modifying.
- Distinctive: line 67
Write or modify the file following the agent's coding standards.
- Distinctive: line 70
After completing each file, output:
- Distinctive: line 77
If the plan crosses a technology boundary (e.g., Laravel → React), pause and confirm:
- Distinctive: line 88
If during implementation you discover:
- Distinctive: line 116
When all files in the plan are implemented:
- Distinctive: line 132
Do NOT run tests or linting at this stage — that happens in Step 7.
- Distinctive: line 133
Do NOT commit at this stage — that happens in Step 5.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 28 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: /implement-plan
Usage
/implement-planInvoke with no arguments. The plan from the previous /plan-feature
session is the source of truth.
Prerequisites
/plan-featuremust have been approved by the lead in this session- If the plan is not approved, do NOT proceed — re-run
/plan-feature
Implementation Rules
The Golden Rules
- Implement ONLY what the approved plan lists. No additions, no refactors, no "while I was in there" improvements.
- Follow the agent's coding standards (defined in the agent prompt) at all times. Do not deviate for convenience.
- Work in dependency order: database → models → repositories → services → controllers → routes → frontend → tests.
- Stop and report if you discover a problem not in the plan — do NOT silently work around it.
Execution Process
1. Re-read the Approved Plan
Before writing a single line, read back the approved plan and output:
IMPLEMENTING PLAN:
──────────────────────────────────────────
Task : {description}
Files : {total count}
Order : {numbered file list}
──────────────────────────────────────────2. Implement File by File
For each file in the plan, follow this mini-cycle:
Step A — Pre-check If the file already exists, read it fully before modifying. Note the existing structure to ensure your changes integrate cleanly.
Step B — Implement Write or modify the file following the agent's coding standards.
Step C — Progress Report After completing each file, output:
✅ [{N}/{total}] {filename}
→ {1-line summary of what was done}Step D — Dependency Pause (for multi-technology tasks) If the plan crosses a technology boundary (e.g., Laravel → React), pause and confirm:
⏸ Backend implementation complete. Ready to proceed to React layer.
Confirm to continue, or flag any backend concerns first.3. Handle Discoveries
If during implementation you discover:
A) The plan is incomplete (e.g., a required file wasn't listed):
🔎 DISCOVERY: {file} needs to be modified but was not in the plan.
Proposed addition: {brief description}
Awaiting lead confirmation before touching this file.B) A technical blocker (e.g., the DB schema doesn't support the feature):
🚧 BLOCKER: {description of the problem}
Cannot proceed with {step} until resolved.
Options: {option A} | {option B}
Awaiting lead decision.C) A risk not caught in planning (e.g., a breaking change discovered):
⚠️ RISK DISCOVERED: {description}
This was not flagged in the plan. Recommend pausing.
Awaiting lead sign-off to continue.4. Completion Report
When all files in the plan are implemented:
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETE
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Files created : {count} — {list}
Files modified: {count} — {list}
Files deleted : {count} — {list}
Discoveries : {count} — {list, or "none"}
Next step: /git-commit
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────Do NOT run tests or linting at this stage — that happens in Step 7. Do NOT commit at this stage — that happens in Step 5.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

