dev-workflow
Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Master development workflow orchestrator. Runs the complete 15-step development process for adding features, updating existing functionality, or fixing bugs. Invokes each step skill in sequence with checkpoints. Use this as the entry point for any development task.
32 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- AsiaOstrich/EngramGraphtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pandazki/pneuma-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- bmsuisse/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- openflocon/Flocontheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Youngju-Heo/claude-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- dzianisv/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use retrospective, brainstorm and 6 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillretrospective
Review how work went and improve the next round. USE WHEN asked for a retro, delays, or process lessons. DO NOT USE for code review or transcript replay.
Also in 3 projects that use this
nicolasestremSkillbrainstorm
Structured idea generation and solution exploration with systematic analysis.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GitHubSkillrefactor
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.
Also in 4 projects that use this
HashiCorpSkillchangelog
Add a `.changelog/<PR_NUMBER>.txt` entry for a GitHub Pull Request, commit, and push.
Also in 3 projects that use this
VercelSkilldeploy
Deploy applications to Vercel. Use when the user says "deploy", "deploy to Vercel", "push to production", "deploy my app", or "go live".
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillimprove-codebase-architecture
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions32 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 32
- ag2ai/faststream★ 5.4ksame name
- xstongxue/best-skills★ 2.9ksame name
- AltimateAI/vscode-dbt-power-user★ 586same name
- openflocon/Flocon★ 379same name
- SmartThingsCommunity/SmartThingsEdgeDrivers★ 349same name
- pandazki/pneuma-skills★ 161same name
- AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards★ 84same name
- clarity-digital-development/tworkflow★ 47same name
- addxai/enterprise-harness-engineering★ 44same name
- muyen/vibe-to-prod★ 34same name
22 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- create-prSkill
- delete-branchSkill
- fix-planSkill
- implement-fixSkill
- implement-planSkill
- init-referencesSkill
- merge-mainSkill
- plan-featureSkill
- read-referencesSkill
- test-lintSkill
- update-referencesSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.
16
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 93
Do not add undiscussed changes ("while I was in there...")
- Distinctive: line 94
After each logical unit (e.g., migration + model, or component + hook), summarize what was done
- Distinctive: line 98
Checkpoint: All files in the plan implemented → proceed to Step 5
- Distinctive: line 110
Follow Conventional Commits format
- Distinctive: line 111
Commit scope = domain from branch name
- Distinctive: line 114
Checkpoint: Commit created and confirmed → proceed to Step 6
- Distinctive: line 143
Run linter (PHP CS Fixer / ESLint / Stylelint)
- Distinctive: line 144
Run test suite (Pest / Vitest / Jest)
- Distinctive: line 145
Run type checker if applicable (TypeScript)
- Distinctive: line 178
Do not introduce new logic while fixing
- Distinctive: line 180
Checkpoint: All fixes applied → proceed to Step 10
- Distinctive: line 222
Delete remote branch after merge
- Distinctive: line 237
Update every reference file affected by the changes in this task
- Distinctive: line 280
If the workflow cannot proceed due to a blocking issue at any step:
- Distinctive: line 281
Stop immediately and report the blocker clearly
- Distinctive: line 282
Do NOT attempt workarounds without lead approval
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: /dev-workflow
Usage
/dev-workflow {task_type} {description}Examples:
/dev-workflow feature "add product filtering by category"
/dev-workflow update "refactor user authentication to use Sanctum tokens"
/dev-workflow fix "cart total not updating on quantity change"15-Step Process
Execute each step in strict order. Present the current step number and name as a header before each action so the lead can track progress.
► STEP 1 — Create Branch
Invoke /git-start with the correct type and domain derived from the task.
/git-start {type} {domain} {normalized-description}type:feature|fix|refactor|choredomain: infer from task description (auth / products / cart / orders / notifications / infra / shared / etc.)- Confirm branch name to lead before proceeding
Checkpoint: Lead confirms branch name → proceed to Step 2
► STEP 2 — Read Reference Files
Invoke /read-references to load all relevant context maps.
/read-references {technology}technology:laravel|react|react-native|frontend|all- This step is MANDATORY — do NOT skip to plan without reading references
Checkpoint: References loaded and summarized → proceed to Step 3
► STEP 3 — Prepare Plan (Plan Mode)
Invoke /plan-feature to enter read-only analysis and produce a
structured implementation plan.
/plan-feature "{task_description}"- Analyze reference files for relevant files to touch
- List every file to create or modify
- Describe the change in each file in 1–2 sentences
- Estimate risk level: low / medium / high
- Flag any breaking changes
Checkpoint: Lead reviews and approves the plan → proceed to Step 4 If rejected: revise plan and re-present. Do NOT implement until approved.
► STEP 4 — Implement the Plan
Invoke /implement-plan to execute the approved plan.
/implement-plan- Implement ONLY what was approved in the plan
- Do not add undiscussed changes ("while I was in there...")
- After each logical unit (e.g., migration + model, or component + hook), summarize what was done
- Surface any discovered complications immediately
Checkpoint: All files in the plan implemented → proceed to Step 5
► STEP 5 — Commit the Changes
Invoke /git-commit to stage and commit the implementation.
/git-commit- Follow Conventional Commits format
- Commit scope = domain from branch name
- Body explains WHY, not what the diff shows
Checkpoint: Commit created and confirmed → proceed to Step 6
► STEP 6 — Create PR and Summary
Invoke /create-pr to push the branch and open a pull request.
/create-pr "{task_description}"- Push branch to remote
- Generate PR title and description
- Include: what changed, why, testing done, screenshots (if UI)
- Link to any related issues or tickets
Checkpoint: PR created with URL confirmed → proceed to Step 7
► STEP 7 — Test and Error Check (Lint / Test)
Invoke /test-lint for the appropriate technology.
/test-lint {technology}- Run linter (PHP CS Fixer / ESLint / Stylelint)
- Run test suite (Pest / Vitest / Jest)
- Run type checker if applicable (TypeScript)
- Collect ALL errors before reporting — do not fix one at a time
Checkpoint (PASS): Zero errors → proceed to Step 12 Checkpoint (FAIL): Errors found → proceed to Step 8
► STEP 8 — Prepare Fix Plan (if errors from Step 7)
Invoke /fix-plan to analyze errors and prepare a targeted fix.
/fix-plan- Categorize errors by type and root cause
- Propose minimal targeted fixes (no scope creep)
- Present fix plan to lead for approval
Checkpoint: Lead approves fix plan → proceed to Step 9
► STEP 9 — Implement the Fix Plan
Invoke /implement-fix to apply the approved fixes.
/implement-fix- Apply ONLY the approved fixes
- Do not introduce new logic while fixing
Checkpoint: All fixes applied → proceed to Step 10
► STEP 10 — Commit the Final Changes
Invoke /git-commit again for the fix changes.
/git-commit- Commit type:
fix - Body explains what test/lint error was corrected
Checkpoint: Fix committed → proceed to Step 11
► STEP 11 — Run Tests Again
Invoke /test-lint a second time to confirm all errors are resolved.
/test-lint {technology}Checkpoint (PASS): Zero errors → proceed to Step 12 Checkpoint (FAIL): Return to Step 8. If 3 fix cycles fail, escalate to lead.
► STEP 12 — Merge into Master / Main
Invoke /merge-main to merge the PR.
/merge-main- Confirm all PR checks are green
- Squash merge with a clean commit message
- Delete remote branch after merge
Checkpoint: Merged and confirmed → proceed to Step 13
► STEP 13 — Update the Reference Files
Invoke /update-references to keep the project map accurate.
/update-references auto- This step is MANDATORY — skipping it breaks future AI context
- Update every reference file affected by the changes in this task
Note: Task completion should be blocked until the affected reference maps have been refreshed.
Checkpoint: Reference files updated and confirmed → proceed to Step 14
► STEP 14 — Delete the Branch
Invoke /delete-branch to clean up.
/delete-branch- Delete local branch
- Confirm remote was already deleted in Step 12
Checkpoint: Branch deleted → proceed to Step 15
► STEP 15 — Complete
Report final status to lead:
✅ WORKFLOW COMPLETE
Task : {task_type} — {description}
Branch : {branch_name} (deleted)
PR : {pr_url} (merged)
Commits : {commit_hashes}
Refs : {list of updated reference files}
Duration: {start → end}Error Escalation Policy
If the workflow cannot proceed due to a blocking issue at any step:
- Stop immediately and report the blocker clearly
- Do NOT attempt workarounds without lead approval
- State which step is blocked and what information is needed
- Resume from the blocked step once resolved — do NOT restart from Step 1
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

