ship
Skill15 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Release-gate sequence: validate → review → push → tag. Wraps kernel:git mechanics with the pre-ship safety chain. Triggers: ship, release, push to main, ready to merge, deploy.
- Commits and pushes
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- wboayue/rust-ibapitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- haiggoh/run-to-completiontheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sanmidable/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Yesterday-AI/ytstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- gaoyu06/harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PeanutGT/NutsSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ios-sync, open-gstack-browser and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Saqlain-811Skillios-sync
Regenerate the iOS debug bridge against the latest upstream gstack templates. (gstack)
Also in 6 projects that use this
seek888Skillopen-gstack-browser
Launch GStack Browser — AI-controlled Chromium with the sidebar extension baked in. Opens a visible browser window where you can watch every action in real time. The sidebar shows a live activity feed and chat. Anti-bot stealth built in. Use when asked to "open gstack browser", "launch browser", "connect chrome", "open chrome", "real browser", "launch chrome", "side panel", or "control my browser". Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "show me the browser".
Also in 10 projects that use this
ayudaySkillsetup-deploy
Configure deployment settings for /land-and-deploy. Detects your deploy platform (Fly.io, Render, Vercel, Netlify, Heroku, GitHub Actions, custom), production URL, health check endpoints, and deploy status commands. Writes the configuration to CLAUDE.md so all future deploys are automatic. Use when: "setup deploy", "configure deployment", "set up land-and-deploy", "how do I deploy with gstack", "add deploy config".
Also in 19 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkilllanding-report
Read-only queue dashboard for workspace-aware ship. Shows which VERSION slots are currently claimed by open PRs, which sibling Conductor workspaces have WIP work likely to ship soon, and what slot /ship would pick next. No mutations — just a snapshot. Use when asked to "landing report", "what's in the queue", "show me open PRs", or "which version do I claim next". (gstack)
Also in 9 projects that use this
zebbernSkilldebug-fix
Find and fix a bug or issue — from any source (GitHub issue, error message, user report, or observed behavior)
Also in 4 projects that use this
ramybarsoumSkilldocument-release
Post-ship documentation update. Reads all project docs, cross-references the diff, updates README/ARCHITECTURE/CONTRIBUTING/CLAUDE.md to match what shipped, polishes CHANGELOG voice, cleans up TODOS, and optionally bumps VERSION. Use when asked to "update the docs", "sync documentation", or "post-ship docs". Proactively suggest after a PR is merged or code is shipped.
Also in 23 projects that use this
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- rtk-ai/rtk★ 86ksame name
- simstudioai/sim★ 30ksame name
- millionco/react-doctor★ 15ksame name
- BuilderIO/agent-native★ 7.6ksame name
- nightly-labs/openbot★ 6.3ksame name
- fallow-rs/fallow★ 5.3ksame name
- puncsky/system-design-and-architecture★ 3.6ksame name
- plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills★ 3.1ksame name
- ShenSeanChen/waku-agent★ 2ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- app-devSkill
- architectureSkill
- buildSkill
- checkpointSkill
- context-mgmtSkill
- debugSkill
- dreamSkill
- evalSkill
- experimentSkill
- forgeSkill
- frontendSkill
- governance-syncSkill
- handoffSkill
- helpSkill
- human-passSkill
- ingestSkill
- initSkill
- knowledge-graphSkill
- landing-pageSkill
- marketing-siteSkill
- metricsSkill
- orchestrationSkill
- qualitySkill
- retrospectiveSkill
- reviewSkill
- simplifySkill
- tearitapartSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 180 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
If unavailable: run project's nearest configured command (see reference/ship-research.md for equivalents).
- Distinctive: line 29
Run install, supported upgrade, and documented recovery commands in a disposable plugin/cache copy from outside the source checkout.
- Distinctive: line 32
Put an explicit resource ceiling around heavyweight suites when available.
- Distinctive: line 57
If a native manifest validator rejects required safety metadata, do not weaken the safety metadata or hand-author an unvalidated manifest.
- Very specific: line 62
Before upgrading the installed plugin on this machine: pgrep -fl codex.
- Very specific: line 67
After publishing the GitHub release, install it into Claude's own cache and verify a fresh headless Claude process: …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 180 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<skill id="ship">Sequence
- Preflight
git status --porcelain— clean? If not: ask user to commit, stash, or abandon.git branch --show-current— matches intent? Wrong branch → stop.git log --oneline {main}..HEAD— commit range matches what you think you're shipping?- (gate: any mismatch → AskUserQuestion before continuing)
- Validate
- Invoke
/kernel:validate(spawns validator agent, full 9-gate safety chain). - If unavailable: run project's nearest configured command (see reference/ship-research.md for equivalents).
- (gate: any FAIL → stop; report which gate; do NOT push)
- For plugins that support multiple loaders, validate each loader's schema independently and exercise one installed payload per loader. A shared file parsing successfully is not proof that its armed behavior is equivalent.
- Run install, supported upgrade, and documented recovery commands in a disposable plugin/cache copy from outside the source checkout. Assert user data and user-owned files are unchanged.
- Put an explicit resource ceiling around heavyweight suites when available; a release gate must fail loudly instead of exhausting the host machine.
- Invoke
- Review
- Tier 1 (1–2 file changes, low risk): self-review via Big 5 from skills/quality/SKILL.md.
- Tier 2+: invoke
/kernel:review(spawns reviewer agent, >80% confidence threshold). - (gate: REQUEST CHANGES → stop; address feedback; restart from step 2)
- (gate: COMMENT → AskUserQuestion: "Address now, ship anyway, or hold?")
- (gate: APPROVE → continue)
- Push
- Feature branch (
feat/*,fix/*,chore/*, etc.):git push(orgit push -u origin {branch}if upstream not set). main/master: STOP. AskUserQuestion required. (NEXUS I0.8)- Detached HEAD or unexpected state: stop; investigate.
- (gate: push rejected / non-fast-forward → surface to user; do NOT force-push)
- Feature branch (
- Version + Tag (on a release)
- Semver: patch=fix, minor=feature or behavior-preserving refactor, major=breaking. Confirm the number with the user.
- Bump ALL canonical declarations in one shot:
scripts/bump-version.sh X.Y.Zupdates.claude-plugin/plugin.json,.claude-plugin/marketplace.json,governance/kernel.md.tmpl, regeneratesAGENTS.mdandCLAUDE.md, and updatesskills/help/SKILL.md. NEVER hand-edit one location — drift failstest_version_sync_all. - Human-author the release prose the script does NOT touch: the plugin/marketplace
descriptionhighlight + aCHANGELOG.mdentry (## [X.Y.Z] - DATE+ Added/Changed/Fixed). - (gate:
bash tests/run-tests.shgreen —test_version_sync_allconfirms no stale version anywhere.) - If a native manifest validator rejects required safety metadata, do not weaken the safety metadata or hand-author an unvalidated manifest. Keep the proven compatibility loader, record the limitation, and defer the native manifest until both schemas can be satisfied.
- Tag (only if user requested a tagged release):
git tag -lto avoid clobber →git tag -a v{X.Y.Z} -m "{summary}"→git push origin v{X.Y.Z}. - Before upgrading the installed plugin on this machine:
pgrep -fl codex. The upgrade deletes the old cache directory under a live session's feet and every hook in that session exits 127 until it restarts. Name the live sessions in the handoff and say they need a restart; never report "upgraded" as if it covered them (docs/upgrading.md, 2026-08-27). - After publishing the GitHub release, install it into Claude's own cache and verify a
fresh headless Claude process:
scripts/install-release.sh X.Y.Z. The script updates only Claude's marketplace/cache, atomically advances Claude'scurrentselector, and fails unless both the installed manifest and the fresh process reportX.Y.Z. Codex installation remains a separate operation.
- Human pass (any user-facing release: app build, deploy, anything a person will touch)
- Load
skills/human-pass/SKILL.mdand write the guide for THIS build: literal controls, paste-ready inputs, expected outcome per step, worst case first, bundled to one sitting with the time cost stated. - Hand it over and wait. The build is not shipped, it is awaiting verdict.
- (gate: no guide, or no recorded verdict → the release is NOT done. Say
"awaiting your pass on
<build>", never "shipped". A green pipeline is not a person having used the thing.) - Findings come back as prose; YOU convert them into issues, not the human.
- Record the verdict as a state-change receipt on the release issue, naming what it unlocks (next build, submission, deploy promotion).
- Load
- Checkpoint
agentdb learn pattern "ship: {branch} {commit_range} {sha_pushed}" "validate=pass review=pass push=ok"- Profile-gated: github-oss/github-production → post PR or release note via gh CLI.
The verdict is part of done
For anything a person will use, the completion states are ordered: validated, merged, deployed, accepted. CI proves the first three. Only a human who used the build proves the fourth, and only that one predicts whether the release was any good: a 15-minute guided pass found five defects that 500+ green tests had not, because some properties only exist on the far side of a real screen with real data. Report the state you actually reached, by name.
Ask-user gates (mandatory pause points)
| Point | Condition | Question |
| Preflight | Branch or commit range is ambiguous | "Shipping {N} commits on {branch}. Confirm?" |
| Review | COMMENT verdict | "Review returned {N} comments. Address now, ship anyway, or hold?" |
| Push | Target is main/master | "About to push to main. NEXUS I0.8 requires explicit say-so. Confirm?" |
Failure modes
validate FAIL→ block; report which gate; do not loop silentlyreview REQUEST_CHANGES→ block; address comments; restart from step 2push rejected (non-fast-forward)→ ask user; never auto-rebase or force-pushtag conflict→ checkgit tag -lfirst; suggest next version; never overwrite existing tag
Anti-patterns
ship_without_validate— every step depends on the previous; skipping validate skips type/test/securitysilent_skip_review— review FAIL with no surfacing to user = trust violationauto_push_to_main— NEXUS I0.8; main requires explicit user confirmationforce_push_on_rejection— rejection means remote has work you don't; investigate before overwritingtag_without_release_intent— tags are durable; casual pushes get no tagskip_checkpoint— shipped-but-unrecorded work breaks retrospective and learning loops
<on_complete> agentdb write-end '{"skill":"ship","branch":"X","commits":N,"validate":"pass","review":"approve|comment|skip","pushed":true,"tagged":"X.Y.Z|none"}' </on_complete>
</skill>Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

