agentleFS
ariadossariadoss/superskills/skills/iac-scan/SKILL.md

iac-scan

Skill12 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Infrastructure-as-Code security scan for changed deploy config — Dockerfiles, docker-compose, Terraform, Kubernetes/Helm, and CI/CD workflows. Flags misconfigurations and exposed secrets (root containers, open ingress, wildcard IAM, privileged pods, untrusted CI triggers). Static diff-scoped analysis (safe to auto-run); uses tfsec/checkov/hadolint/actionlint when present. Use when asked to "scan infra", "IaC scan", "check the Dockerfile/terraform/k8s", "CI security", or after changing deploy/infra config.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Scope to the changed infra files: Don't re-scan the whole tree.

    line 54
  2. Distinctive:

    If none of these changed, say so and stop.

    line 70

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/iac-scan

Scan changed infrastructure/deploy config for security misconfigurations and exposed secrets. Static and read-only — analyzes the files directly.

Auto-run safety envelope: the auto-run path uses only local static linters that need no network and no auth — hadolint, tfsec, checkov (offline/local policy only), kube-score, actionlint, zizmor. That's why it's safe to auto-run, unlike /pentest (an interactive check gated on an authorization confirmation, whose opt-in clearwing modes are networked scanners that bill their own LLM provider — its default in-harness source hunt touches no network but still waits for authorization). Anything that reaches the network — e.g. trivy pulling vulnerability DBs, or checkov fetching remote policies — is opt-in / recommend-only, never part of the auto-run. If only networked tools are available, run the signature checks instead and recommend the networked scan separately.

Hard rules

  • Evidence-grounded: file:line, the offending directive, the rule/CWE, and the concrete risk ("container runs as root", "0.0.0.0/0 on port 22", "secret baked into image layer").
  • Severity by blast radius: internet-exposed, privilege-escalating, or secret-leaking misconfigs are CRITICAL/HIGH; style/pinning nits are LOW.
  • Smallest correct fix, shown as a diff; do not apply it.
  • Scope to the changed infra files. Don't re-scan the whole tree.
  • Prefer real scanners when present. Local static linters (hadolint, tfsec, kube-score, actionlint, zizmor, offline checkov) are part of the auto-run path; networked scanners (trivy DB pulls, remote-policy checkov) are recommend-only. Fall back to the signature checks below when none are present — and always say which mode ran (which tools, or signature mode).

Trigger (what counts as infra/deploy config)

  • Containers: Dockerfile, *.dockerfile, docker-compose*.y*ml, .dockerignore
  • Terraform: *.tf, *.tfvars
  • Kubernetes / Helm: *.y*ml with kind: under k8s/, manifests/, charts/, helm/, or deploy/
  • CI/CD: .github/workflows/**, .gitlab-ci.yml, Jenkinsfile, *.circleci/*
  • Web/proxy/cloud: nginx.conf, Caddyfile, *.tf cloud resources, serverless.yml

If none of these changed, say so and stop.

What to check

Docker — non-root USER; pinned base image (no :latest); no secrets in ENV/ARG/layers; no ADD http://…; minimal surface; HEALTHCHECK; no unnecessary EXPOSE; --no-install-recommends/cleaned caches. (hadolint)

docker-compose — no privileged: true; no network_mode: host; never bind /var/run/docker.sock; secrets via secrets: not environment:; pinned image tags.

Terraform — no security-group/firewall 0.0.0.0/0 on sensitive ports (22/3389/DB); no public buckets/blobs; no IAM Action: "*" / Resource: "*"; encryption at rest + in transit enabled; no hardcoded secrets/keys; remote state with locking; logging/versioning on. (tfsec / checkov)

Kubernetes / Helm — runAsNonRoot, drop privileged/allowPrivilegeEscalation; no hostPath/hostNetwork/hostPID; resource limits/requests set; readOnlyRootFilesystem; no default ServiceAccount with broad RBAC / cluster-admin; pinned image digests; NetworkPolicy present; no secrets in plain env. (kube-score / kubesec)

CI/CD (GitHub Actions et al.) — no pull_request_target running untrusted PR code; least-privilege top-level permissions:; third-party actions pinned to a full commit SHA (not a moving tag); no script injection via unsanitized ${{ github.event.* }} in run:; secrets never echoed; no persist-credentials left on when not needed. (actionlint + zizmor)

Web/proxy — TLS enforced; security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Content-Type-Options); no directory listing; no server tokens leaking versions.

Steps

  1. Scope — resolve changed infra files (or $ARGUMENTS). None → stop.
  2. Tool pass — for each file type, if the matching scanner is installed, run it scoped to the changed files and capture findings verbatim. Note which tools ran.
  3. Signature pass — for file types with no installed scanner, Grep/Read for the patterns above. Mark these Observed (clear match) vs Suspected.
  4. Secrets sweep — across all changed infra files, flag high-entropy strings, AKIA…, private keys, tokens, password=/secret= literals. (Complements /defense's app-code secret scan.)
  5. Report — group by severity; smallest fix per finding as a diff.

Report format

# IaC scan — <scope> @ <date>

Scanners run: hadolint ✓ / tfsec ✗ (signature mode) / actionlint ✓ …

## CRITICAL / HIGH
- <file:line> — <directive> — <rule/CWE> — <risk> — <fix>

## MEDIUM / LOW
- …

## Secrets
- <file:line> — <kind> — rotate + move to a secret manager

Anti-patterns (do not do)

  • Claiming a misconfig without quoting the directive and naming the risk.
  • Scanning the whole repo instead of the changed infra files.
  • Applying fixes or rewriting manifests — this scans and drafts; the user applies.
  • Treating a pinning/style nit as CRITICAL, or burying an open-to-the-world port.

Related commands

  • /defense — app-code OWASP/secrets sweep; /iac-scan is its infra counterpart.
  • /pentest — deeper security hunt (in-harness pipeline by default; network probing drives clearwing's MCP machinery — authorization-gated — and its hunt/SARIF pipeline runs agent-driven on the session via the bundled bridge, with provider-driven runs billed and ask-first); recommend after /iac-scan finds HIGH/CRITICAL or when a live environment needs probing.
  • /cso — threat-model the deployment topology at design time (/write-plan).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.