finish-branch
Skill12 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
- Commits and pushes
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
- Distinctive: line 36
Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
- Distinctive: line 40
Also check the task list for a verification item: If a todo list drove this branch and every item is complete, confirm the list actually …
- Distinctive: line 70
Don't add explanation: - keep options concise.
- Distinctive: line 132
Wait for exact confirmation.
- Distinctive: line 146
Check if in worktree:
- Distinctive: line 156
For Option 3: Keep worktree.
- Distinctive: line 171
Fix: Always verify tests before offering options
- Distinctive: line 178
Problem: Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3)
- Distinctive: line 179
Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4
- Distinctive: line 190
Delete work without confirmation
- Distinctive: line 194
Verify tests before offering options
- Distinctive: line 195
Check a completed task list carried a verification item that ran
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Finishing a Development Branch
Overview
Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.
Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
The Process
Step 1: Verify Tests
Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...If tests fail:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.
Also check the task list for a verification item. If a todo list drove this branch and every item is complete, confirm the list actually contains a verification step (a test run, a build, a check) and that it ran — a list finished with no verification item is not verified: name the gap, add the item, run it, then continue to Step 2.
Step 2: Determine Base Branch
# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/nullOr ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"
Step 3: Present Options
Present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Which option?Don't add explanation - keep options concise.
Step 4: Execute Choice
Option 1: Merge Locally
# Switch to base branch
git checkout <base-branch>
# Pull latest
git pull
# Merge feature branch
git merge <feature-branch>
# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>
# If tests pass
git branch -d <feature-branch>Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Option 2: Push and Create PR
# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# Create PR
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>
## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Option 3: Keep As-Is
Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."
Don't cleanup worktree.
Option 4: Discard
Confirm first:
This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>
Type 'discard' to confirm.Wait for exact confirmation.
If confirmed:
git checkout <base-branch>
git branch -D <feature-branch>Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 5)
Step 5: Cleanup Worktree
For Options 1, 2, 4:
Check if in worktree:
git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current)If yes:
git worktree remove <worktree-path>For Option 3: Keep worktree.
Quick Reference
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch |
| 1. Merge locally | ✓ | - | - | ✓ |
| 2. Create PR | - | ✓ | ✓ | - |
| 3. Keep as-is | - | - | ✓ | - |
| 4. Discard | - | - | - | ✓ (force) |
Common Mistakes
Skipping test verification
- Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
- Fix: Always verify tests before offering options
Open-ended questions
- Problem: "What should I do next?" → ambiguous
- Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options
Automatic worktree cleanup
- Problem: Remove worktree when might need it (Option 2, 3)
- Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4
No confirmation for discard
- Problem: Accidentally delete work
- Fix: Require typed "discard" confirmation
Red Flags
Never:
- Proceed with failing tests
- Merge without verifying tests on result
- Delete work without confirmation
- Force-push without explicit request
Always:
- Verify tests before offering options
- Check a completed task list carried a verification item that ran
- Present exactly 4 options
- Get typed confirmation for Option 4
- Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only
Integration
Called by:
- subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - After all tasks complete
- executing-plans (Step 5) - After all batches complete
Pairs with:
- using-git-worktrees - Cleans up worktree created by that skill
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude★ 5same name
- sergvss/agents-best-teams★ 2same name
- Chrike/coding-agent-skills★ 1same name
- jnsfhrmnn/jf-agentic-coding-starter-kit★ 1same name
- slowernet/dietpowers★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- a11ySkill
- articleSkill
- basic-reviewSkill
- cache-strategySkill
- clean-codeSkill
- cli-for-agentSkill
- content-writerSkill
- daily-qaSkill
- dbmap-auto-offSkill
- dbmapSkill
- db-optimizeSkill
- debugSkill
- defenseSkill
- diff-walkthroughSkill
- evalSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- fuzzSkill
- handoffSkill
- humanizeSkill
- iac-scanSkill
- kb-advisorSkill
- minimalist-reviewSkill
- pentestSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- playwrightSkill
- pricingSkill
- qa-fullSkill
- quota-resilienceSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- superskills-doctorSkill
- superskills-upgradeSkill
- tapestrySkill
- tddSkill
- test-coverageSkill
- validate-ideaSkill
- verifySkill
- web-perfSkill
- worktreesSkill
- write-planSkill
- youtubeSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

