ingest
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Ingests a source into the second brain. Saves the raw material immutably, distills a wiki page from it, updates every entity and concept it touches, then updates the index and log. Triggers on "ingest", "add research", "save this", "add this to my vault", "clip this", or sharing a URL, PDF, or article.
88 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zaynram/scholartheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- silouone/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- hydra-db/hydradb-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- fjwood69/moritheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- zedarvates/frugal-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Mharbulous/probanda-devtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
LambenthanSkilldaily-arxiv
每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新
Also in 5 projects that use this
LambenthanSkillexp-eval
实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges
Also in 5 projects that use this
phanghonghaoSkillposter
HTML/CSS A4 海报生成。从沙龙/活动 Markdown 文件生成科技风 A4 海报 PDF/PNG。Use when user mentions: poster, 海报, 海报生成, make poster, generate poster, 活动海报, 沙龙海报.
Also in 5 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-eval
Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-run
Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +6 more from Lambenthan
- +1 more from skyllwt
Other versions88 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 88
- garrytan/gbrain★ 32ksame name
- skyllwt/OmegaWiki★ 1.7ksame name
- DAIR-AutoResearch/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- PKU-DAIR/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- skyllwt/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- suboss87/FDEOps★ 940same name
- coreyhaines31/makerskills★ 893same name
- jason-effi-lab/karpathy-llm-wiki-vault★ 718same name
- ZimoLiao/scholaraio★ 585same name
- egregore-labs/egregore★ 293same name
78 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository23 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- remotion-best-practicesSkill
- add-inspirationSkill
- brandSkill
- craft-contentSkill
- draft-articleSkill
- draft-carouselSkill
- draft-diagramSkill
- draft-imagesSkill
- draft-videoSkill
- heygen-avatarSkill
- heygen-videoSkill
- humanizerSkill
- initSkill
- linkedin-postSkill
- lintSkill
- listenSkill
- meetingSkill
- voiceSkill
- wikiSkill
- youtube-descriptionSkill
- youtube-shortSkill
- youtube-uploadSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 72 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
8
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Read .amplifyrc from the cwd or vault root:
- Very specific: line 24
Read {vaultPath}/CLAUDE.md — the vault schema.
- Distinctive: line 38
Ask whether to go ahead. This is the one point where the user's judgment shapes what gets filed, and it is cheap here and expensive later.
- Very specific: line 43
Write to {sources}/Clippings/{slug}.md, kebab-case from the title.
- Very specific: line 69
Use the ingest_source MCP tool if available — it handles the frontmatter, the date, and the slug.
- Distinctive: line 109
Keep this page factual. Interpretation belongs on concept and synthesis pages, so a source page stays valid even after you change your mind …
- Very specific: line 125
Every page needs aliases: ["Its Title Case Title"].
- Very specific: line 137
Run the humanizer skill's rules over every page written.
- Very specific: line 146
Add one line per new page to {wiki}/index.md, under its category header, under 120 characters:
- Very specific: line 172
If more than ten ingests have happened since the last lint entry in log.md, say so and offer to run /lint
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 72 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ingest a Source
One source becomes many pages. The raw material is saved once and never touched again; everything downstream is a distillation the wiki owns and keeps current.
A single ingest touching 10-15 wiki pages is normal. That is the pattern working.
Step 0: Load configuration
Read .amplifyrc from the cwd or vault root:
paths.sources → raw layer root (default: "Sources")
paths.wiki → wiki root (default: "Wiki")Clippings go in {sources}/Clippings. Wiki pages go in {wiki}/{Summaries,Concepts,Entities,Synthesis} — never a Wiki/Sources/.
Read {vaultPath}/CLAUDE.md — the vault schema. It is the authority on page shape,
frontmatter, and naming. This skill is the workflow; that file is the contract.
Step 1: Read the source
- URL → WebFetch
- PDF → Read with page ranges for large files
- Pasted text → work with what you have
Extract title, author, source URL, publish date, and the full content.
Step 2: Talk before writing
Say what the source actually argues and what is worth keeping, in a few sentences. Ask whether to go ahead. This is the one point where the user's judgment shapes what gets filed, and it is cheap here and expensive later.
Step 3: Save the raw clipping
Write to {sources}/Clippings/{slug}.md, kebab-case from the title.
---
title: "[Title]"
source: "[URL or reference]"
author: "[Author]"
published: "[YYYY-MM-DD if known]"
created: "[today YYYY-MM-DD]"
tags:
- resource/[article|paper|guide|video|book|tool|course|podcast|documentation]
- [topic tags in kebab-case]
---
[Full content, faithful to the source. Use its own headings. Preserve code, tables,
figures, and data exactly. Do not summarize — this is the reference copy, and the
whole point is never needing the original again.]
---
**Source**: [Title](URL)This file is written once and never edited again. Corrections and second thoughts belong on wiki pages, which cite it.
Use the ingest_source MCP tool if available — it handles the frontmatter, the date,
and the slug.
Step 4: Write the wiki source page
{wiki}/Summaries/{same-slug}.md. Same filename as the clipping, so the pair is obvious.
---
tags: [topic tags in kebab-case]
sources: [{same-slug}.md]
created: [today]
updated: [today]
aliases: ["[Title Case Title]"]
---
# [Title Case Title]
[One paragraph: what this source is and why it is in the vault.]
## Claims
- [What the source actually asserts, one per line. Attribute rather than assert:
"argues that X" beats stating X as settled.]
## Worth keeping
[The two or three things you would want back in a year. Be specific.]
## Limits
[What it does not show. Sample size, scope, conflicts of interest, what the author
assumes. Skip this section only when there is genuinely nothing to say.]
## Connects to
- [[Concept Page]] — how
- [[Entity Page]] — howKeep this page factual. Interpretation belongs on concept and synthesis pages, so a source page stays valid even after you change your mind about what it means.
Step 5: Touch every entity and concept
This is the step that makes the wiki compound, and the step people skip.
List every concept, person, organization, product, and tool the source discusses. For each one:
- Page exists → update it with what this source adds. Cite the source in the body
and append the clipping filename to its
sourcesfrontmatter. Bumpupdated. - No page → create it, following the page shapes in
CLAUDE.md. - Contradicts what a page says → do not overwrite. Write that the sources disagree, cite both, and say which is more recent.
Every page needs aliases: ["Its Title Case Title"]. Filenames are kebab-case and
links are written from the title, so without it [[Vector Search]] will not resolve
to vector-search.md and every link to that page dangles.
Then link in both directions. A link that only points one way is half a link: if the
source page links [[Vector Search]], the vector search page names this source too.
The orphan rule: every new page must link to at least one existing page. If a new page connects to nothing, the wiki is missing a concept in between. Create that one too.
Step 6: Humanize
Run the humanizer skill's rules over every page written. Wiki pages are reference
material, so plain beats impressive.
Cut AI vocabulary (delve, landscape, crucial, leverage, robust, showcase, comprehensive, innovative), filler ("it's worth noting", "in today's world"), significance inflation, and em dash pileups. Vary sentence length. Preserve code, tables, and data exactly.
Step 7: Update the index
Add one line per new page to {wiki}/index.md, under its category header, under 120
characters:
- [[Page Title]] — one-line summaryPages that only got updated do not need a new line, but fix their summary if it no longer describes the page.
Step 8: Append to the log
{wiki}/log.md, append-only. Never edit an entry already written.
## [YYYY-MM-DD] ingest | [Source Title]
Added source page. Created [[New Page]], [[Other New Page]]. Updated
[[Existing Page]] and [[Another]].Step 9: Report
- The clipping path and the wiki source page path
- Pages created and pages updated, with counts
- Anything the source contradicted
- Concepts mentioned that do not have a page yet, if you chose not to create them
- If more than ten ingests have happened since the last lint entry in
log.md, say so and offer to run/lint
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

