ingest
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Turn a YouTube URL or local transcript/text file into a saved key-points extraction — core thesis, structured key points, and an applicability assessment grounded in the user's actual setup. Use when the user asks to "ingest" a video/article/file, wants key points extracted from a transcript, or wants to absorb a recommended video without watching it. Local-only; nothing is uploaded.
- Installs packages
88 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zaynram/scholartheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- hydra-db/hydradb-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- fjwood69/moritheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- zedarvates/frugal-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Mharbulous/probanda-devtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- levi-qiao/obsidian-llm-wikitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
LambenthanSkilldaily-arxiv
每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新
Also in 5 projects that use this
LambenthanSkillexp-eval
实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges
Also in 5 projects that use this
phanghonghaoSkillposter
HTML/CSS A4 海报生成。从沙龙/活动 Markdown 文件生成科技风 A4 海报 PDF/PNG。Use when user mentions: poster, 海报, 海报生成, make poster, generate poster, 活动海报, 沙龙海报.
Also in 5 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-eval
Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-run
Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +6 more from Lambenthan
- +1 more from skyllwt
Other versions88 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 88
- garrytan/gbrain★ 32ksame name
- skyllwt/OmegaWiki★ 1.7ksame name
- DAIR-AutoResearch/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- PKU-DAIR/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- skyllwt/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- suboss87/FDEOps★ 940same name
- coreyhaines31/makerskills★ 893same name
- jason-effi-lab/karpathy-llm-wiki-vault★ 718same name
- ZimoLiao/scholaraio★ 585same name
- egregore-labs/egregore★ 293same name
78 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-usage-cardSkill
- keep-aliveSkill
- sitrepSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 72 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Follow the contract below exactly.
- Very specific: line 30
Assess applicability: when the content touches the user's tooling or workflow (their agent harness, hooks, skills, automations, projects).
- Distinctive: line 66
Every extraction traces to its source via the header.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 72 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ingest — source → saved key points
Follow the contract below exactly. This is pre-reading distillation, not a database pipeline: the only outputs are local files.
Steps
- Resolve the source.
- YouTube URL or bare video ID → fetch the transcript locally:
This writesuv run <this-skill-dir>/scripts/fetch_transcript.py "<url>" --out transcriptstranscripts/youtube-<id>.txt(plain) andtranscripts/youtube-<id>.timestamped.md. It only downloads public captions; if none exist, tell the user and stop. Ifuvis missing, fall back topython3 -m pip install --user youtube-transcript-api, then run the script withpython3. - Local file path → read it directly. If the user gave a topic instead of a
path, look for a matching file under
./transcripts/before asking.
- YouTube URL or bare video ID → fetch the transcript locally:
- Extract key points:
- Core thesis in 2–4 sentences.
- Key points: main arguments/framework as a compact structured list.
- Preserve concrete numbers, demos, and decision rules — drop filler, repetition, and channel/self promotion.
Assess applicability when the content touches the user's tooling or workflow (their agent harness, hooks, skills, automations, projects). Inspect the actual current state before claiming a gap — whichever of these exist on this machine:
- Claude Code —
~/.claude/settings.json,~/.claude/skills/,~/.claude/hooks/,CLAUDE.md - Codex —
~/.codex/config.toml,~/.codex/skills/,~/.codex/automations/,AGENTS.md - the current repo, either way
Then say where the user already stands vs. what the source recommends. Recommendations must be proportionate — flag what is NOT worth doing too. Skip this section entirely if the content has no operational relevance.
- Claude Code —
Save to the same directory as the source, named
<source-basename>_extracted_key_point.md, with this header:# Extracted Key Points — <source-basename> Source: <url or path> Topic: <one line> Extracted: <YYYY-MM-DD> ## Core thesis ## Key points ## Applicability to my setup (optional)- Reply with a one-paragraph summary and the saved file path — do not paste the whole file back.
Guarantees
- Local-only: the transcript fetch is the sole network call.
- Denser than the source: a section that adds no decision, number, or reusable idea doesn't survive.
- Every extraction traces to its source via the header.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

