agentleFS
alinaqialinaqi/claude-bootstrap/skills/dataforseo/SKILL.md

dataforseo

Skill708 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Keyword & SERP research via the DataForSEO API — search volume, competition, CPC, keyword ideas for naming/SEO decisions

  • Reads credentials

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Check whoami for balance before large runs.

    line 65
  2. Distinctive:

    All take the same Basic-auth header.

    line 77

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

DataForSEO Skill — keyword & SERP research

Purpose: Get real search demand (monthly volume, competition, CPC) and keyword ideas from Google Ads data via DataForSEO, so naming and content decisions are grounded in data rather than intuition.

Auth (never commit the key)

DataForSEO uses HTTP Basic auth. Provide credentials via environment only:

export DATAFORSEO_LOGIN="you@example.com"
export DATAFORSEO_PASSWORD="…"
# or a single combined value:
export DATAFORSEO_API_KEY="login:password"   # or its base64

The helper reads these from the env — it never hardcodes or logs the secret, and only ever calls api.dataforseo.com. Keep the key in a local .env that is git-ignored; do not paste it into the repo, a URL, or chat.

Usage

The helper is dataforseo.py in this skill folder:

DFS="$(cat ~/.claude/.bootstrap-dir)/skills/dataforseo/dataforseo.py"

python3 "$DFS" whoami                                  # auth check + balance
python3 "$DFS" volume "claude code" "coding agent"     # search volume table
python3 "$DFS" ideas  "coding agent"                   # related keyword ideas
# options: --location <code, default 2840=US>  --language <code, default en>

volume → each keyword's monthly search volume, competition (LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH), and CPC. ideas → the searched long-tail around a seed.

Reading the results (naming decisions)

  • Zero / n/a volume on every candidate is itself the answer: the names aren't search terms, so SEO can't rank them against each other — decide on clarity/brand and accept that discovery happens on GitHub/HN/X, not search.
  • Category term vs. brand term: a huge-volume category word (e.g. the tool's ecosystem name) is where demand lives; a brand name rides it only if it contains it. Weigh discoverability against being on-brand for what you built.
  • Wrong-intent volume is a trap: a candidate with existing volume may be drawing an audience searching for something else (a different industry meaning). That volume hurts, it doesn't help.
  • Competition + CPC proxy commercial intent, not just popularity — high CPC means advertisers pay for that term (buyers), low CPC often means informational or noise.

Cost & etiquette

live endpoints bill per call (search volume / ideas ≈ $0.05–0.10 each). Batch many keywords into ONE volume call (it accepts up to 1000) rather than looping. Check whoami for balance before large runs.

Common endpoints (beyond the helper)

NeedEndpoint
Search volumekeywords_data/google_ads/search_volume/live
Keyword ideaskeywords_data/google_ads/keywords_for_keywords/live
SERP (who ranks)serp/google/organic/live/advanced
Ranked keywords for a domaindataforseo_labs/google/ranked_keywords/live
Competitor domainsdataforseo_labs/google/competitors_domain/live

All take the same Basic-auth header; POST a JSON array of task objects.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.