cross-agent-delegation
Skill708 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Cross-agent task routing — Codex auto-review, Kimi delegation by complexity score (iCPG + Claude reasoning), iCPG + Mnemos mandatory for all agents
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- alinaqi/maggyword for word, first seen Jun 12, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- alinaqi/maggy★ 711100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository75 other files it gives its agents.
- templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- templates/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- aeo-optimizationSkill
- agentic-developmentSkill
- agent-teamsSkill
- ai-modelsSkill
- android-javaSkill
- android-kotlinSkill
- autonomous-testingSkill
- aws-auroraSkill
- aws-dynamodbSkill
- azure-cosmosdbSkill
- baseSkill
- build-in-publicSkill
- cloudflare-d1Skill
- code-deduplicationSkill
- code-graphSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- commit-hygieneSkill
- context-shuntSkill
- council-reviewSkill
- cpg-analysisSkill
- credentialsSkill
- database-schemaSkill
- dataforseoSkill
- demo-videoSkill
- existing-repoSkill
- external-model-delegationSkill
- firebaseSkill
- flutterSkill
- gemini-reviewSkill
- icpgSkill
- iterative-developmentSkill
- klaviyoSkill
- llm-patternsSkill
- maggySkill
- medusaSkill
- mnemosSkill
- model-routingSkill
- ms-teams-appsSkill
- nodejs-backendSkill
- playwright-testingSkill
- polyphonySkill
- posthog-analyticsSkill
- project-toolingSkill
- pwa-developmentSkill
- pythonSkill
- react-nativeSkill
- react-webSkill
- reddit-adsSkill
- reddit-apiSkill
- security-auditSkill
- securitySkill
- session-managementSkill
- shopify-appsSkill
- site-architectureSkill
- supabase-nextjsSkill
- supabase-nodeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
When Codex is installed, a Stop hook reviews code after tests pass:
- Distinctive: line 35
Fully automatic: No user or Claude action needed.
- Distinctive: line 41
When Kimi is installed and the task complexity is bounded, Claude delegates directly — the user does not need to run anything.
- Distinctive: line 127
After Kimi finishes, Claude:
- Distinctive: line 147
Before ANY code change, Claude runs these (and includes results when delegating):
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Cross-Agent Delegation
Claude Code orchestrates task routing to Kimi and Codex. The user interacts with Claude only — delegation happens behind the scenes.
Tool Detection
At session start, detect available tools:
command -v kimi &>/dev/null && HAS_KIMI=true || HAS_KIMI=false
command -v codex &>/dev/null && HAS_CODEX=true || HAS_CODEX=falseCodex Auto-Review (Stop Hook — Automatic)
When Codex is installed, a Stop hook reviews code after tests pass:
- TDD loop check runs tests
codex-auto-review.shruns Codex on the diff- Critical/High findings feed back to Claude (exit 2)
- Clean reviews pass through (exit 0)
Fully automatic. No user or Claude action needed.
Kimi Delegation (Claude Orchestrates)
When Kimi is installed and the task complexity is bounded, Claude delegates directly — the user does not need to run anything.
Step 1: Score complexity, not file count
File count is a poor proxy for delegation risk. A 1-file change to an authz path is harder than a 12-file rename. Score the task on five dimensions, each 0-2, sourced from iCPG signals plus Claude's semantic reasoning:
| Dimension | 0 (low) | 1 (medium) | 2 (high) | Source |
| Cyclomatic / surface depth | <10 LOC, no branches | 10-50 LOC, ≤3 branches | 50+ LOC or nested control flow | iCPG query_graph over function bodies |
| Fan-out (consumer blast radius) | 0-2 callers | 3-10 callers | 11+ callers | iCPG trace_path(<symbol>, mode=callers) |
| Crosses a security boundary (SEC-006, auth, PII, RLS, org-scope, billing, payments) | None | Tangential | Direct read or write | iCPG SEC-* / R-063 tags + grep for org_id, user_id, auth, pii |
| Concurrency / transactional | Pure / sync | Async only | Locks, transactions, atomic claims, FOR UPDATE, asyncio.Lock, session.begin | iCPG concurrency flags + grep |
| Domain invariants required | None / well-documented inline | Some implicit (need to read 1-2 files) | Heavy (cross-doc, ADR-bound, RFC-bound) | Claude reasoning + iCPG ADR linkage |
# Auto-collect signals
icpg query blast <scope> --format json # fan-out, async flags, sec tags
grep -rE "org_id|user_id|auth|pii" <file> # cheap sec heuristic if iCPG flags absent
grep -rE "asyncio.Lock|FOR UPDATE|session.begin" <file> # concurrency heuristicStep 2: Sum → routing
| Total score | Route | Rationale |
| 0-3 | Kimi solo | Bounded surface, no security/concurrency/cross-doc concerns |
| 4-6 | Kimi → Codex auto-review (no user prompt) | Real risk, but not so high that we need full Claude context — Codex catches what Kimi might miss |
| 7-10 | Claude handles directly | Cross-cutting / security-critical / concurrency-heavy — needs full context |
Step 3: Floor — trivial-case shortcut
To skip iCPG-query cost on truly trivial work:
# If <2 files changed AND no SEC/auth/PII/concurrency keyword in diff,
# → auto-Kimi without scoring.
FILES=$(git diff --name-only | wc -l)
HAS_RISK_KEYWORDS=$(git diff | grep -ciE "org_id|auth|pii|asyncio|FOR UPDATE|transaction|session\.begin" || true)
if [ "$FILES" -lt 2 ] && [ "$HAS_RISK_KEYWORDS" -eq 0 ]; then
AUTO_KIMI=true
fiThis handles the trivial-rename / typo-fix case without paying the iCPG round-trip.
When NOT to Delegate (overrides scoring)
- User explicitly asked Claude to do it
- Cross-service changes (API + frontend + database) — needs full context regardless of score
- Production hotfix on a release branch — cross-tool review latency is too high
- Score 7+ in any single dimension (one critical axis is enough to keep Claude in the loop)
Step 4: Delegate via Bash
Claude writes a mnemos checkpoint, then runs Kimi headless:
# 1. Save current context to disk
mnemos checkpoint --force
# 2. Get context summary for Kimi
CONTEXT=$(mnemos resume 2>/dev/null)
# 3. Get constraints for target files
CONSTRAINTS=$(icpg query constraints <target-file> 2>/dev/null)
# 4. Run Kimi headless with full context
kimi --print -y -w . -p "
## Context (from mnemos checkpoint)
$CONTEXT
## Constraints (from iCPG)
$CONSTRAINTS
## Task
<specific task description>
## Rules
- Run tests after changes
- Record changes: icpg record --base main
- Write checkpoint when done: mnemos checkpoint --force
"Step 4: Read Results
After Kimi finishes, Claude:
# Read what Kimi did
mnemos resume # Kimi's checkpoint
icpg status # Kimi's recorded symbols
git diff # Kimi's file changesWhen NOT to Delegate
- Security-sensitive code (auth, crypto, payments)
- Cross-service changes (API + frontend + database)
- Refactors that touch shared interfaces
- User explicitly asked Claude to do it
iCPG — Mandatory for All Agents
Before ANY code change, Claude runs these (and includes results when delegating):
Pre-Task Queries
# 1. Duplicate check — already done?
icpg query prior "<goal>"
# 2. Constraints — what invariants apply?
icpg query constraints <file-path>
# 3. Risk — is this symbol fragile?
icpg query risk <symbol-name>After Code Changes
icpg record --reason <id> --base main
icpg drift checkMnemos — Mandatory for All Agents
At Task Start
mnemos add goal "<task description>"At Sub-Goal Boundaries
mnemos checkpointAt Task End (auto-handled by Stop hook)
mnemos checkpoint --forceContext Transfer Between Tools
The checkpoint is the bridge. Claude writes it, Kimi reads it:
# Claude saves state
mnemos checkpoint --force
# Kimi (or Codex) reads state
mnemos resumeThe checkpoint contains: goal, constraints, recent files, git state, fatigue level.
Full Orchestration Flow
TASK ARRIVES (user tells Claude)
|
v
[1] Claude: icpg query prior "<goal>" ← Already done?
[2] Claude: trivial-case shortcut ← <2 files & no risk keywords?
|
+-- YES + Kimi installed -----> AUTO-KIMI (no scoring)
|
+-- NO ↓
v
[3] Claude: score complexity (5 dims × 0-2, iCPG + reasoning)
|
+-- score 0-3 ----> KIMI SOLO PATH
| [a] mnemos checkpoint --force
| [b] kimi --print -y -p "..."
| [c] mnemos resume + git diff
| [d] Continue in Claude
|
+-- score 4-6 ----> KIMI + CODEX REVIEW PATH
| [a] mnemos checkpoint --force
| [b] kimi --print -y -p "..."
| [c] codex review --uncommitted ← Auto-review the diff
| [d] If P0/P1 findings: re-prompt Kimi with findings
| [e] Once clean: continue in Claude
|
+-- score 7-10 ----> CLAUDE DIRECT PATH (full context)
|
v
[4] icpg query constraints <files> ← Invariants
[5] icpg query risk <symbols> ← Fragility
[6] mnemos add goal "<task>" ← Track in memory
|
v
[7] IMPLEMENT (TDD: RED -> GREEN)
|
v
[8] Stop: tdd-loop-check.sh ← Tests pass?
[9] Stop: codex-auto-review.sh ← Codex reviews diff
[10] Stop: icpg-stop-record.sh ← Record symbols
[11] Stop: mnemos-checkpoint.sh ← Save memoryDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

