commit-hygiene
Skill708 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Atomic commits, PR size limits, commit thresholds, stacked PRs
- Commits and pushes
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- archiforge/agent-crafttheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- Gentleman-Programming/gentleman-guardian-angeltheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- alinaqi/maggyword for word, first seen Jun 12, 2026
- unrealandychan/AgentFoundrytheir own version, first seen Apr 22, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- alinaqi/maggy★ 711100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- Gentleman-Programming/gentleman-guardian-angel★ 1.2ksame name
- unrealandychan/AgentFoundry★ 1same name
- archiforge/agent-craft★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository75 other files it gives its agents.
- templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- templates/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- aeo-optimizationSkill
- agentic-developmentSkill
- agent-teamsSkill
- ai-modelsSkill
- android-javaSkill
- android-kotlinSkill
- autonomous-testingSkill
- aws-auroraSkill
- aws-dynamodbSkill
- azure-cosmosdbSkill
- baseSkill
- build-in-publicSkill
- cloudflare-d1Skill
- code-deduplicationSkill
- code-graphSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- context-shuntSkill
- council-reviewSkill
- cpg-analysisSkill
- credentialsSkill
- cross-agent-delegationSkill
- database-schemaSkill
- dataforseoSkill
- demo-videoSkill
- existing-repoSkill
- external-model-delegationSkill
- firebaseSkill
- flutterSkill
- gemini-reviewSkill
- icpgSkill
- iterative-developmentSkill
- klaviyoSkill
- llm-patternsSkill
- maggySkill
- medusaSkill
- mnemosSkill
- model-routingSkill
- ms-teams-appsSkill
- nodejs-backendSkill
- playwright-testingSkill
- polyphonySkill
- posthog-analyticsSkill
- project-toolingSkill
- pwa-developmentSkill
- pythonSkill
- react-nativeSkill
- react-webSkill
- reddit-adsSkill
- reddit-apiSkill
- security-auditSkill
- securitySkill
- session-managementSkill
- shopify-appsSkill
- site-architectureSkill
- supabase-nextjsSkill
- supabase-nodeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Purpose: Keep commits atomic, PRs reviewable, and git history clean.
- Distinctive: line 451
When a feature is genuinely large, use stacked PRs:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Commit Hygiene Skill
Purpose: Keep commits atomic, PRs reviewable, and git history clean. Advise when it's time to commit before changes become too large.
Core Philosophy
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ATOMIC COMMITS │
│ ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ One logical change per commit. │
│ Each commit should be self-contained and deployable. │
│ If you need "and" to describe it, split it. │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SMALL PRS WIN │
│ ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ < 400 lines changed = reviewed in < 1 hour │
│ > 1000 lines = likely rubber-stamped or abandoned │
│ Smaller PRs = faster reviews, fewer bugs, easier reverts │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ COMMIT EARLY, COMMIT OFTEN │
│ ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ Working code? Commit it. │
│ Test passing? Commit it. │
│ Don't wait for "done" - commit at every stable point. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Commit Size Thresholds
Warning Thresholds (Time to Commit!)
| Metric | Yellow Zone | Red Zone | Action |
| Files changed | 5-10 files | > 10 files | Commit NOW |
| Lines added | 150-300 lines | > 300 lines | Commit NOW |
| Lines deleted | 100-200 lines | > 200 lines | Commit NOW |
| Total changes | 250-400 lines | > 400 lines | Commit NOW |
| Time since last commit | 30-60 min | > 60 min | Consider committing |
Ideal Commit Size
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ IDEAL COMMIT │
│ ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ Files: 1-5 │
│ Lines: 50-200 total changes │
│ Scope: Single logical unit of work │
│ Message: Describes ONE thing │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Check Current State (Run Frequently)
Quick Status Check
# See what's changed (staged + unstaged)
git status --short
# Count files and lines changed
git diff --stat
git diff --cached --stat # Staged only
# Get totals
git diff --shortstat
# Example output: 8 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)Detailed Change Analysis
# Full diff summary with file names
git diff --stat HEAD
# Just the numbers
git diff --numstat HEAD | awk '{add+=$1; del+=$2} END {print "+"add" -"del" total:"add+del}'
# Files changed count
git status --porcelain | wc -lPre-Commit Check Script
#!/bin/bash
# scripts/check-commit-size.sh
# Thresholds
MAX_FILES=10
MAX_LINES=400
WARN_FILES=5
WARN_LINES=200
# Get stats
FILES=$(git status --porcelain | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
STATS=$(git diff --shortstat HEAD 2>/dev/null)
INSERTIONS=$(echo "$STATS" | grep -oE '[0-9]+ insertion' | grep -oE '[0-9]+' || echo 0)
DELETIONS=$(echo "$STATS" | grep -oE '[0-9]+ deletion' | grep -oE '[0-9]+' || echo 0)
TOTAL=$((INSERTIONS + DELETIONS))
echo "📊 Current changes: $FILES files, +$INSERTIONS -$DELETIONS ($TOTAL total lines)"
# Check thresholds
if [ "$FILES" -gt "$MAX_FILES" ] || [ "$TOTAL" -gt "$MAX_LINES" ]; then
echo "🔴 RED ZONE: Commit immediately! Changes are too large."
echo " Consider splitting into multiple commits."
exit 1
elif [ "$FILES" -gt "$WARN_FILES" ] || [ "$TOTAL" -gt "$WARN_LINES" ]; then
echo "🟡 WARNING: Changes getting large. Commit soon."
exit 0
else
echo "🟢 OK: Changes are within healthy limits."
exit 0
fiWhen to Commit
Commit Triggers (Any One = Commit)
| Trigger | Example |
| Test passes | Just got a test green → commit |
| Feature complete | Finished a function → commit |
| Refactor done | Renamed variable across files → commit |
| Bug fixed | Fixed the issue → commit |
| Before switching context | About to work on something else → commit |
| Clean compile | Code compiles/lints clean → commit |
| Threshold hit | > 5 files or > 200 lines → commit |
Commit Immediately If
- ✅ Tests are passing after being red
- ✅ You're about to make a "big change"
- ✅ You've been coding for 30+ minutes
- ✅ You're about to try something risky
- ✅ The current state is "working"
Don't Wait For
- ❌ "Perfect" code
- ❌ All features done
- ❌ Full test coverage
- ❌ Code review from yourself
- ❌ Documentation complete
Atomic Commit Patterns
Good Atomic Commits
✅ "Add email validation to signup form"
- 3 files: validator.ts, signup.tsx, signup.test.ts
- 120 lines changed
- Single purpose: email validation
✅ "Fix null pointer in user lookup"
- 2 files: userService.ts, userService.test.ts
- 25 lines changed
- Single purpose: fix one bug
✅ "Refactor: Extract PaymentProcessor class"
- 4 files: payment.ts → paymentProcessor.ts + types
- 180 lines changed
- Single purpose: refactoringBad Commits (Too Large)
❌ "Add authentication, fix bugs, update styles"
- 25 files changed
- 800 lines changed
- Multiple purposes mixed
❌ "WIP"
- Unknown scope
- No clear purpose
- Hard to review/revert
❌ "Updates"
- 15 files changed
- Mix of features, fixes, refactors
- Impossible to review properlySplitting Large Changes
Strategy 1: By Layer
Instead of one commit with:
- API endpoint + database migration + frontend + tests
Split into:
1. "Add users table migration"
2. "Add User model and repository"
3. "Add GET /users endpoint"
4. "Add UserList component"
5. "Add integration tests for user flow"Strategy 2: By Feature Slice
Instead of one commit with:
- All CRUD operations for users
Split into:
1. "Add create user functionality"
2. "Add read user functionality"
3. "Add update user functionality"
4. "Add delete user functionality"Strategy 3: Refactor First
Instead of:
- Feature + refactoring mixed
Split into:
1. "Refactor: Extract validation helpers" (no behavior change)
2. "Add email validation using new helpers" (new feature)Strategy 4: By Risk Level
Instead of:
- Safe changes + risky changes together
Split into:
1. "Update dependencies" (safe, isolated)
2. "Migrate to new API version" (risky, separate)PR Size Guidelines
Optimal PR Size
| Metric | Optimal | Acceptable | Too Large |
| Files | 1-10 | 10-20 | > 20 |
| Lines changed | 50-200 | 200-400 | > 400 |
| Commits | 1-5 | 5-10 | > 10 |
| Review time | < 30 min | 30-60 min | > 60 min |
PR Size vs Defect Rate
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ RESEARCH FINDINGS (Google, Microsoft studies) │
│ ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ PRs < 200 lines: 15% defect rate │
│ PRs 200-400 lines: 23% defect rate │
│ PRs > 400 lines: 40%+ defect rate │
│ │
│ Review quality drops sharply after 200-400 lines. │
│ Large PRs get "LGTM" rubber stamps, not real reviews. │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘When PR is Too Large
# Check PR size before creating
git diff main --stat
git diff main --shortstat
# If too large, consider:
# 1. Split into multiple PRs (stacked PRs)
# 2. Create feature flag and merge incrementally
# 3. Use draft PR for early feedbackCommit Message Format
Structure
<type>: <description> (50 chars max)
[optional body - wrap at 72 chars]
[optional footer]Types
| Type | Use For |
feat | New feature |
fix | Bug fix |
refactor | Code change that neither fixes nor adds |
test | Adding/updating tests |
docs | Documentation only |
style | Formatting, no code change |
chore | Build, config, dependencies |
Examples
feat: Add email validation to signup form
fix: Prevent null pointer in user lookup
refactor: Extract PaymentProcessor class
test: Add integration tests for checkout flow
chore: Update dependencies to latest versionsGit Workflow Integration
Pre-Commit Hook for Size Check
#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/pre-commit
MAX_LINES=400
MAX_FILES=15
FILES=$(git diff --cached --name-only | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
STATS=$(git diff --cached --shortstat)
INSERTIONS=$(echo "$STATS" | grep -oE '[0-9]+ insertion' | grep -oE '[0-9]+' || echo 0)
DELETIONS=$(echo "$STATS" | grep -oE '[0-9]+ deletion' | grep -oE '[0-9]+' || echo 0)
TOTAL=$((INSERTIONS + DELETIONS))
if [ "$TOTAL" -gt "$MAX_LINES" ]; then
echo "❌ Commit too large: $TOTAL lines (max: $MAX_LINES)"
echo " Consider splitting into smaller commits."
echo " Use 'git add -p' for partial staging."
exit 1
fi
if [ "$FILES" -gt "$MAX_FILES" ]; then
echo "❌ Too many files: $FILES (max: $MAX_FILES)"
echo " Consider splitting into smaller commits."
exit 1
fi
echo "✅ Commit size OK: $FILES files, $TOTAL lines"Partial Staging (Split Large Changes)
# Stage specific hunks interactively
git add -p
# Stage specific files
git add path/to/specific/file.ts
# Stage with preview
git add -N file.ts # Intent to add
git diff # See what would be added
git add file.ts # Actually addUnstage If Too Large
# Unstage everything
git reset HEAD
# Unstage specific files
git reset HEAD path/to/file.ts
# Stage just what you need for THIS commit
git add -pClaude Integration
Periodic Check During Development
Claude should run this check after every significant change:
# Quick status
git diff --shortstat HEADThresholds for Claude to advise committing:
| Condition | Claude Action |
| > 5 files changed | Suggest: "Consider committing current changes" |
| > 200 lines changed | Suggest: "Changes are getting large, commit recommended" |
| > 10 files OR > 400 lines | Warn: "⚠️ Commit now before changes become unmanageable" |
| Test just passed | Suggest: "Good checkpoint - commit these passing tests" |
| Refactoring complete | Suggest: "Refactoring done - commit before adding features" |
Claude Commit Reminder Messages
📊 Status: 7 files changed, +180 -45 (225 total)
💡 Approaching commit threshold. Consider committing current work.
---
📊 Status: 12 files changed, +320 -80 (400 total)
⚠️ Changes are large! Commit now to keep PRs reviewable.
Suggested commit: "feat: Add user authentication flow"
---
📊 Status: 3 files changed, +85 -10 (95 total)
✅ Tests passing. Good time to commit!
Suggested commit: "fix: Validate email format on signup"Stacked PRs (For Large Features)
When a feature is genuinely large, use stacked PRs:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STACKED PR PATTERN │
│ ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ │
│ main ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────│
│ └── PR #1: Database schema (200 lines) ← Review first │
│ └── PR #2: API endpoints (250 lines) ← Review second │
│ └── PR #3: Frontend (300 lines) ← Review third │
│ │
│ Each PR is reviewable independently. │
│ Merge in order: #1 → #2 → #3 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Creating Stacked PRs
# Create base branch
git checkout -b feature/auth-schema
# ... make changes ...
git commit -m "feat: Add users table schema"
git push -u origin feature/auth-schema
gh pr create --base main --title "feat: Add users table schema"
# Create next branch FROM the first
git checkout -b feature/auth-api
# ... make changes ...
git commit -m "feat: Add authentication API endpoints"
git push -u origin feature/auth-api
gh pr create --base feature/auth-schema --title "feat: Add auth API endpoints"
# And so on...Checklist
Before Every Commit
- Changes are for ONE logical purpose
- Tests pass (if applicable)
- Lint/typecheck pass
- < 10 files changed
- < 400 lines total
- Commit message describes ONE thing
Before Creating PR
- Total lines < 400 (ideal < 200)
- All commits are atomic
- No "WIP" or "fixup" commits
- PR title describes the change
- Description explains why, not just what
Red Flags (Stop and Split)
- ❌ Commit message needs "and"
- ❌ > 10 files in one commit
- ❌ > 400 lines in one commit
- ❌ Mix of features, fixes, and refactors
- ❌ "I'll clean this up later"
Quick Reference
Thresholds
Files: ≤ 5 = 🟢 | 6-10 = 🟡 | > 10 = 🔴
Lines: ≤ 200 = 🟢 | 201-400 = 🟡 | > 400 = 🔴
Time: ≤ 30min = 🟢 | 30-60min = 🟡 | > 60min = 🔴Commands
# Quick status
git diff --shortstat HEAD
# Detailed file list
git diff --stat HEAD
# Partial staging
git add -p
# Check before PR
git diff main --shortstatCommit Now If
- ✅ Tests just passed
- ✅ > 200 lines changed
- ✅ > 5 files changed
- ✅ About to switch tasks
- ✅ Current state is "working"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

