npm-publish-smoke
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use immediately after every npm publish (or any registry release), before closing the release task, announcing, or reporting success — including when publish exited 0, local tests were green, and it is late. Also use when a published CLI behaves differently via npx than locally, or prints nothing with exit 0. Triggers — "publish прошла?", "релиз готов", closing a release checklist item, npx silence.
- Commits and pushes
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- docx-analytical-ruSkill
- docx-ruSkill
- looperSkill
- managerSkill
- merge-conflict-resolutionSkill
- skill-lifecycleSkill
- team-worklogSkill
- verify-doneSkill
- worktree-dispatchSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
NOT for pre-publish testing (that's your normal test suite) — this skill is strictly post-publish.
- Very specific: line 46
Read counters, not tails: When a smoke step runs tests or prints a report, assert the machine-readable signal (# pass N / # fail 0, exit …
- Very specific: line 60
Never npm unpublish (breaks downstream lock-files.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
npm-publish-smoke — the registry is the only truth
Overview
npm publish exiting 0 means the server accepted a tarball. It does not mean a user can run your package. Local tests validate the working tree; users get the registry tarball through npx in a clean environment. Every release that broke silently, broke in that gap.
Core rule: a release is DONE only after the registry artifact runs in a clean environment. Not before.
This is a specialization of verify-done for releases: the "fresh evidence" is a clean-env run of the published artifact.
When to use
- The moment
npm publish(orgh release create, or any registry push) returns — smoke BEFORE closing the task, announcing, or telling anyone "готово". - A published CLI works locally but users report nothing happens /
command not found/ wrong version. - NOT for pre-publish testing (that's your normal test suite) — this skill is strictly post-publish.
The protocol (in order, ~3 minutes)
PKG=@scope/name; VER=1.2.3
# 1. Registry metadata: the version exists and `latest` actually moved
npm view "$PKG@$VER" version && npm view "$PKG" dist-tags.latest
# criterion: latest == $VER (a stuck dist-tag ships old code to `npx pkg`)
# 2. The real tarball — not npm pack --dry-run from your disk
tar -tzf "$(npm view "$PKG@$VER" dist.tarball | xargs -I{} sh -c 'curl -sL {} -o /tmp/pkg.tgz && echo /tmp/pkg.tgz')" | head -30
# criterion: expected files present (dist/, bin, README), no secrets, no tests
# 3. Clean-environment run — the user's path, not yours
NPM_CACHE=$(mktemp -d) && npm_config_cache="$NPM_CACHE" npx --yes "$PKG@$VER" --help
# criterion: exit 0 AND expected output text. Run from a directory OUTSIDE the
# package repo — local node_modules resolution lies.
# 4. One real command, not just --help
npm_config_cache="$NPM_CACHE" npx --yes "$PKG@$VER" <main-command with real input>
# criterion: validate the OUTPUT (file exists, content correct), not just exit codeRead counters, not tails. When a smoke step runs tests or prints a report, assert the machine-readable signal (# pass N / # fail 0, exit code, output file hash) — never conclude success from the last few lines looking fine.
Known traps (each one shipped in a real release)
| Trap | Symptom | Cause / fix |
| isMain vs symlink | CLI prints nothing, exit 0 — only via npx | npx runs bin through a .bin symlink, so fileURLToPath(import.meta.url) === process.argv[1] is false. Fix: realpathSync() both sides. Local runs never catch this. |
| Stuck dist-tag | npx pkg serves the previous version | latest didn't move (publish with explicit tag, or a later re-publish of an old version). npm dist-tag add pkg@ver latest. |
| Missing files | MODULE_NOT_FOUND or broken README page | files in package.json excluded something the code imports. Fix files list, patch release. |
| Scoped package private | 404 / 402 on install | First publish of @scope/pkg needs --access public. |
| Lost exec bit | permission denied via npx | bin file lost +x in packing; check tar -tvzf mode column. |
If the smoke fails
Never npm unpublish (breaks downstream lock-files; blocked after 24h). Instead:
npm deprecate "$PKG@$VER" "broken release, use $NEXT" # then ship the patchAnd say it plainly in your report: the release was broken, the smoke caught it. A caught failure is a good outcome; a silent one costs more.
Rationalizations — none of these survive contact
| Excuse | Reality |
| "publish exited 0, the registry accepted it" | Accepted ≠ runnable. The 0-exit bug class exists precisely here. |
| "87/87 tests green before publish" | Tests ran the working tree. Users run the tarball. Different artifacts. |
"npm pack --dry-run showed the right files" | Dry-run packs your disk. The registry serves what actually uploaded. |
| "It's 23:40, I'll smoke it in the morning" | The announcement/user lands before you wake up. The smoke is 3 minutes. |
| "I checked the npm web page" | A rendered README proves nothing about an executable bin. |
| "The output tail looked fine" | Tails lie. Read the counters and exit codes. |
Red flags — STOP and run the protocol
- About to close a release task / write "опубликовано" with no clean-env run
- Declaring success from the tail of any output instead of its counters
- Smoking from inside the package repo directory
- A CLI that "works on my machine" but you never ran it via
npx pkg@ver
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

