agentleFS
alexgrebeshok-coderalexgrebeshok-coder/dirigent-skills/skills/docx-analytical-ru/SKILL.md

docx-analytical-ru

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Assembling analytical docx/pptx documents in Russian — comparative analysis, due diligence, counterparty checks, explanatory notes, partner profiles, shortlists. No pandoc table of contents; bordered tables with background-fill semantics; two tones (internal / external). Триггеры (RU) — «аналитика», «DD», «due diligence», «сравнительный», «пояснительная записка», «профиль партнёра», «таблицы с рамками», «без оглавления». Do NOT use for simple business letters/memos — use docx-ru.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    After editing the md source — scan for homoglyphs and stray English words (see the reference).

    line 67
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep working files, sources, and final exports in whatever project document structure you already use (working / sources / final-published …

    line 87

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Analytical documents (docx / pptx)

Reading order: docx-ru → this skill → for pptx, also see the pptx skill (if installed) for a visual QA pass.

Terminology glossary: references/terminologiya-analitika.md — the example glossary below is built around one industry niche (data-center power equipment); replace it with your own domain's terms.

When to use

  • Comparative analysis, due diligence, market research
  • An internal explanatory note (risks, "who to engage / who not to")
  • An external partner profile (without the internal DD block)
  • An 8–10 slide deck for the external version

Do NOT use for counterparty contract letters or table-of-contents rationale documents — those stay in docx-ru.

Assembling the docx (required steps)

pandoc "INPUT.md" -o "OUTPUT.docx" --metadata lang=ru-RU   # NO --toc

python3 ../docx-ru/scripts/normalize_docx.py "OUTPUT.docx"

python3 scripts/format_analytical_docx.py \
  --kind compare|research|partner_internal|partner_external "OUTPUT.docx"

bash scripts/validate_analytical_docx.sh "OUTPUT.docx"

--kind variants

kindTitle
compareСРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ПАРТНЁРОВ
researchИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ ПАРТНЁРОВ И РЫНКА
partner_internalПОЯСНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ЗАПИСКА (ВНУТРЕННЯЯ)
partner_externalПРОФИЛЬ ПАРТНЁРА

Edit the title/subtitle strings inside format_analytical_docx.py for your own project before use — they ship with a generic placeholder partner name.

Formatting

Inherits from docx-ru: Times New Roman, black text, 2.54 cm margins.

Additionally (handled by format_analytical_docx.py):

  • No table of contents — strip TOC / «Оглавление» / the pandoc title block
  • Centered title: 16 pt bold + 12 pt subtitle
  • Section headings: 14 pt bold
  • Tables: borders on every cell; header row #1F3864 with white text; first column #F2F2F2; semantics conveyed via background fill (green / yellow / orange) — not colored font

Language

  • Russian only in text meant for people (see the glossary reference).
  • «Оговорка» instead of "Disclaimer"; «документ 1»/«документ 2» instead of "Doc1"/"Doc2".
  • After editing the md source — scan for homoglyphs and stray English words (see the reference).

Two tones

InternalExternal
Risks, financial/tax exposure, hypothesesyesno
"Do not engage", DD disqualificationyesno
Competencies, scenarios, referencesyesyes

File names: {Type}_{Subject}_{description}_DD.MM.YYYY.docx

PPTX

  • 8–10 slides; Times New Roman; palette #1F3864 / #F2F2F2; no "font zoo"
  • Reference template: scripts/build_analytical_pptx.py (edit the content, don't copy the whole script per project)
  • QA: python3 -m markitdown file.pptx + glossary / validate

Placement

Keep working files, sources, and final exports in whatever project document structure you already use (working / sources / final-published tiers). This skill only handles the assembly and QA — routing the finished file is a project-specific convention.

Pre-send checklist

Formatting

  • No table of contents
  • Bordered tables with background fill, TNR 12 pt
  • Centered title block

Text

  • No English terms from the glossary (except URLs / proper names / ISO terms)
  • No homoglyphs
  • External docx has no internal risk blocks

QA

  • validate_analytical_docx.sh — no unexpected matches
  • Figures consistent across the document package

Related skills

  • docx-ru — base typography and normalization
  • pptx — visual QA for slide decks

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.