docx-analytical-ru
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Assembling analytical docx/pptx documents in Russian — comparative analysis, due diligence, counterparty checks, explanatory notes, partner profiles, shortlists. No pandoc table of contents; bordered tables with background-fill semantics; two tones (internal / external). Триггеры (RU) — «аналитика», «DD», «due diligence», «сравнительный», «пояснительная записка», «профиль партнёра», «таблицы с рамками», «без оглавления». Do NOT use for simple business letters/memos — use docx-ru.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- docx-ruSkill
- looperSkill
- managerSkill
- merge-conflict-resolutionSkill
- npm-publish-smokeSkill
- skill-lifecycleSkill
- team-worklogSkill
- verify-doneSkill
- worktree-dispatchSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 67
After editing the md source — scan for homoglyphs and stray English words (see the reference).
- Distinctive: line 87
Keep working files, sources, and final exports in whatever project document structure you already use (working / sources / final-published …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Analytical documents (docx / pptx)
Reading order: docx-ru → this skill → for pptx, also see the pptx skill (if installed) for a visual QA pass.
Terminology glossary: references/terminologiya-analitika.md — the example glossary below is built around one industry niche (data-center power equipment); replace it with your own domain's terms.
When to use
- Comparative analysis, due diligence, market research
- An internal explanatory note (risks, "who to engage / who not to")
- An external partner profile (without the internal DD block)
- An 8–10 slide deck for the external version
Do NOT use for counterparty contract letters or table-of-contents rationale documents — those stay in docx-ru.
Assembling the docx (required steps)
pandoc "INPUT.md" -o "OUTPUT.docx" --metadata lang=ru-RU # NO --toc
python3 ../docx-ru/scripts/normalize_docx.py "OUTPUT.docx"
python3 scripts/format_analytical_docx.py \
--kind compare|research|partner_internal|partner_external "OUTPUT.docx"
bash scripts/validate_analytical_docx.sh "OUTPUT.docx"--kind variants
| kind | Title |
compare | СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ПАРТНЁРОВ |
research | ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ ПАРТНЁРОВ И РЫНКА |
partner_internal | ПОЯСНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ЗАПИСКА (ВНУТРЕННЯЯ) |
partner_external | ПРОФИЛЬ ПАРТНЁРА |
Edit the title/subtitle strings inside format_analytical_docx.py for your own project before use — they ship with a generic placeholder partner name.
Formatting
Inherits from docx-ru: Times New Roman, black text, 2.54 cm margins.
Additionally (handled by format_analytical_docx.py):
- No table of contents — strip TOC / «Оглавление» / the pandoc title block
- Centered title: 16 pt bold + 12 pt subtitle
- Section headings: 14 pt bold
- Tables: borders on every cell; header row
#1F3864with white text; first column#F2F2F2; semantics conveyed via background fill (green / yellow / orange) — not colored font
Language
- Russian only in text meant for people (see the glossary reference).
- «Оговорка» instead of "Disclaimer"; «документ 1»/«документ 2» instead of "Doc1"/"Doc2".
- After editing the md source — scan for homoglyphs and stray English words (see the reference).
Two tones
| Internal | External | |
| Risks, financial/tax exposure, hypotheses | yes | no |
| "Do not engage", DD disqualification | yes | no |
| Competencies, scenarios, references | yes | yes |
File names: {Type}_{Subject}_{description}_DD.MM.YYYY.docx
PPTX
- 8–10 slides; Times New Roman; palette
#1F3864/#F2F2F2; no "font zoo" - Reference template:
scripts/build_analytical_pptx.py(edit the content, don't copy the whole script per project) - QA:
python3 -m markitdown file.pptx+ glossary / validate
Placement
Keep working files, sources, and final exports in whatever project document structure you already use (working / sources / final-published tiers). This skill only handles the assembly and QA — routing the finished file is a project-specific convention.
Pre-send checklist
Formatting
- No table of contents
- Bordered tables with background fill, TNR 12 pt
- Centered title block
Text
- No English terms from the glossary (except URLs / proper names / ISO terms)
- No homoglyphs
- External docx has no internal risk blocks
QA
validate_analytical_docx.sh— no unexpected matches- Figures consistent across the document package
Related skills
docx-ru— base typography and normalizationpptx— visual QA for slide decks
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

