start-ticket
Skill1 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user starts work on a ticket, issue, story, or feature request (a ticket id like PROJ-123, a GitHub issue, or pasted requirements) and wants it understood, planned, and implemented.
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- heartnetkung/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- CharlesLadera/claude-custom-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- ethansmadjaa/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- me2resh/apexyardtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- kyto64/aidd-template-scaletheir own version, first seen Sep 16, 2026
- hetalkumawat-bs/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 20, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- flurdy/agent-skills★ 9same name
- CharlesLadera/claude-custom-skills★ 1same name
- ethansmadjaa/skills★ 1same name
- heartnetkung/claude-skills★ 1same name
- hetalkumawat-bs/claude-skills★ 1same name
- kyto64/aidd-template-scale★ 0same name
- rherranzg/air-traffic-controller★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- brag-docSkill
- design-docSkill
- fix-bugSkill
- incidentSkill
- one-on-oneSkill
- postmortemSkill
- refactorSkill
- review-prSkill
- ship-prSkill
- standupSkill
- weekly-updateSkill
- whats-nextSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
If nothing is unclear, skip the questions: put your one-line understanding at the top of the plan in step 4 and ask for a single yes.
- Distinctive: line 44
Wait for a yes (one yes covers understanding and plan when there were no questions), unless the user pre-approved in step 2.
- Distinctive: line 49
Only what the ticket asks: no extra features, no drive-by refactors.
- Distinctive: line 51
No dead code, no unused imports.
- Distinctive: line 52
Add or update tests for the new behavior when the project has tests.
- Distinctive: line 67
No file edits before the user confirms your understanding, unless they pre-approved.
- Distinctive: line 68
Never claim tests pass without running them.
- Distinctive: line 69
When a requirement is ambiguous, ask.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Start ticket
Turn a ticket into the smallest correct change that follows the codebase's patterns: understand → plan → confirm → build → verify.
1. Get the ticket
- A ticket id like
PROJ-123and a board tool is available (Jira, Linear, ClickUp, Trello, Asana, as MCP tools) → fetch summary, description, acceptance criteria. - A GitHub issue number or URL →
gh issue view <n>, as theghaccount picked below. - Otherwise use the text the user gave. If there is none, ask for it.
gh account: the user may have several gh accounts, and the active one may not see this repo. Before the first gh call, list each account's access:
for u in $(gh auth status 2>&1 | sed -n 's/.*account \([^ ]*\).*/\1/p'); do echo "$u $(GH_TOKEN=$(gh auth token --user "$u") gh repo view --json viewerPermission -q .viewerPermission 2>/dev/null)"; done; truePick the first account with ADMIN, MAINTAIN or WRITE, else one with READ or TRIAGE. If none shows a permission, skip every gh call. Run every gh call as that account, GH_TOKEN=$(gh auth token --user <account>) gh ..., with 2>/dev/null. Never run gh auth switch.
2. Find the gaps — stop here first
List what is unclear: expected behavior, inputs and validation, edge cases, error handling, UI, environments. Ask only the questions whose answers change the implementation, most important first, max 5. Then state your understanding in 3–5 lines and wait.
Do not edit or create any file until the user confirms. Exception: the user already said the requirements are final and to go ahead. Then state your understanding in one line and continue.
If nothing is unclear, skip the questions: put your one-line understanding at the top of the plan in step 4 and ask for a single yes.
3. Read the codebase
Find similar features to copy, helpers and constants to reuse, tests covering this area, and per-environment config. Cite path:line for each.
4. Plan — confirm before code
Change: <path> — <what>
Create: <path> — <why> (prefer none)
Reuse: <path:line> — <what>
Tests: <what you will add and run>
Risks: <what could break>Wait for a yes (one yes covers understanding and plan when there were no questions), unless the user pre-approved in step 2.
5. Build
- Match the surrounding code's style and patterns exactly.
- Only what the ticket asks: no extra features, no drive-by refactors.
- Reuse existing helpers; use named constants, not magic values.
- No dead code, no unused imports.
- Add or update tests for the new behavior when the project has tests.
6. Verify
Find the build and test commands (package.json, Makefile, README, CI config) and run them. Fix failures you caused. Report:
Done: <one line>
Changed: <files>
Tests: <command> — <passed/failed counts>
Open: <assumptions or follow-ups>Rules
- No file edits before the user confirms your understanding, unless they pre-approved.
- Never claim tests pass without running them.
- When a requirement is ambiguous, ask; don't guess.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

