start-ticket
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Start a GitHub Issue: fetch details, label in-progress, create worktree from origin/main,
- Commits and pushes
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- heartnetkung/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- CharlesLadera/claude-custom-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- alabenkhlifa/dayjobtheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- ethansmadjaa/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- me2resh/apexyardtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- hetalkumawat-bs/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 20, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- flurdy/agent-skills★ 9same name
- alabenkhlifa/dayjob★ 1same name
- CharlesLadera/claude-custom-skills★ 1same name
- ethansmadjaa/skills★ 1same name
- heartnetkung/claude-skills★ 1same name
- hetalkumawat-bs/claude-skills★ 1same name
- rherranzg/air-traffic-controller★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/CLAUDE.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/code-style.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/docker-compose-local.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/github-cli-pr.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/git.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/git-worktree.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/ticket-driven-workflow.mdcCursor rule
- address-pr-feedbackSkill
- agentic-e2eSkill
- close-ticketSkill
- docs-app-syncSkill
- review-dependabot-prSkill
- screen-to-specSkill
- spec-lookupSkill
- spec-to-screenSkill
- address-pr-feedbackSkill
- agentic-e2eSkill
- close-ticketSkill
- docs-app-syncSkill
- review-dependabot-prSkill
- screen-to-specSkill
- spec-lookupSkill
- spec-to-screenSkill
- start-ticketSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Very specific: line 19
Ensure label in-progress exists.
- Distinctive: line 29
Create or reuse worktree:
- Distinctive: line 37
All further edits run in this worktree.
- Very specific: line 43
Read relevant docs/ (docs/_inventory.md → area index → detail files).
- Distinctive: line 50
Update docs in the same PR when behavior or SSOT changes.
- Distinctive: line 54
Run only what exists in the repo:
- Very specific: line 56
If lint/test scripts exist (package.json, Makefile, etc.), run them and report results.
- Distinctive: line 57
If none exist, skip and state "no lint/test toolchain configured" in the PR.
- Distinctive: line 61
Commit with explicit git add (no git add -A).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Start ticket workflow
Issue number: $ARGUMENTS
Execute phases in order. Report completion after each phase.
Phase 1: Issue and worktree
gh issue view $ARGUMENTS— read title, body, labels, acceptance criteria- Ensure label
in-progressexists; create if missing (gh label create in-progress ...). On permission error, stop. gh issue edit $ARGUMENTS --add-label in-progress- Resolve main repo root (see
git-worktree.md):COMMON=$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir) MAIN_ROOT=$(cd "$COMMON/.." && pwd) REPO=$(basename "$MAIN_ROOT") WORKTREES_ROOT="$(dirname "$MAIN_ROOT")/${REPO}-worktrees" git fetch origin- Create or reuse worktree:
BRANCH="feature/$ARGUMENTS" DIR=$(echo "$BRANCH" | tr '/' '-') mkdir -p "$WORKTREES_ROOT" git worktree add -b "$BRANCH" "${WORKTREES_ROOT}/${DIR}" origin/main 2>/dev/null || cd "${WORKTREES_ROOT}/${DIR}" cd "${WORKTREES_ROOT}/${DIR}" - All further edits run in this worktree.
Report: issue summary to the user.
Phase 2: Plan
- Read relevant
docs/(docs/_inventory.md→ area index → detail files). Use/spec-lookupfor quick lookups. - Grep/Glob for affected code paths.
- Present implementation plan; wait for user approval if scope is unclear.
Phase 3: Implement
- Implement per plan and acceptance criteria.
- Update docs in the same PR when behavior or SSOT changes.
Phase 4: Quality gates
Run only what exists in the repo:
- If lint/test scripts exist (package.json, Makefile, etc.), run them and report results.
- If none exist, skip and state "no lint/test toolchain configured" in the PR.
Phase 5: PR
- Commit with explicit
git add(nogit add -A). - Push branch.
- Open PR to
mainwith body containingFixes #$ARGUMENTSand template sections filled in. gh pr create --base main ...
Report: PR URL.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

