incident
Skill1 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when something is broken in production or users are affected right now — an outage, errors spiking, "we have an incident", "prod is down" — to triage, mitigate, and keep a running timeline.
21 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- AsiaOstrich/EngramGraphtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lalulali/vespyrtheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standardstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- fervaldezjr/agent-opstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- umararshad4/honey-stacktheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- DataWithBaraa/claude-code-data-engineering-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use runbook, perf and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillrunbook
Create or update an operational runbook for a recurring task or procedure. Use when documenting a task that on-call or ops needs to run repeatably, turning tribal knowledge into exact step-by-step commands, adding troubleshooting and rollback steps to an existing procedure, or writing escalation paths for when things go wrong.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillperf
Speed and memory performance rules for Rust crates, the Node addon, webui-framework, and webui-delivery.
Also in 3 projects that use this
drewdrewthisSkillsweep
Search for similar patterns, anti-patterns, or issues elsewhere in the codebase after a fix or feature. Use after implementing a fix to catch the same bug in other places, or proactively to audit for a known pattern.
Also in 3 projects that use this
OpenAISkillobservability
Vercel Observability expert guidance — Drains (logs, traces, speed insights, web analytics), Web Analytics, Speed Insights, runtime logs, custom events, OpenTelemetry integration, and monitoring dashboards. Use when instrumenting, debugging, or optimizing application performance and user experience on Vercel.
Also in 5 projects that use this
mijunriSkilldatabase
数据库脚本与操作规范。脚本放在 db_scripts 目录,遵循查询优化、事务、安全等实践。
Also in 3 projects that use this
tuistSkillmigrate
Migrates existing Xcode projects to Tuist generated workspaces with build and run validation, external dependency mapping, and migration checklists. Use when adopting Tuist for an existing app or converting a hand-edited Xcode project to generated projects.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 21
- AsiaOstrich/universal-dev-standards★ 84same name
- DataWithBaraa/claude-code-data-engineering-skills★ 84same name
- manusco/resonance★ 38same name
- ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit★ 19same name
- lalulali/vespyr★ 11same name
- NotHarshhaa/devops-skills★ 8same name
- greglas75/zuvo★ 7same name
- umararshad4/honey-stack★ 5same name
- AsiaOstrich/EngramGraph★ 4same name
- gonimar/claude-web-studio★ 4same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- brag-docSkill
- design-docSkill
- fix-bugSkill
- one-on-oneSkill
- postmortemSkill
- refactorSkill
- review-prSkill
- ship-prSkill
- standupSkill
- start-ticketSkill
- weekly-updateSkill
- whats-nextSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Stop the bleeding first, keep a timeline as you go, and never take a risky action without a yes.
- Distinctive: line 34
Ask at most 3 quick questions, only for what you can't find: what is broken, who is affected, since when.
- Very specific: line 50
Read the suspect diffs (git show <hash>).
- Distinctive: line 58
Every finding, decision and action gets a timestamped line in the file.
- Very specific: line 70
When the user confirms it's fixed: set Status: Resolved, add the resolution to the timeline, tick done actions, and suggest the postmortem …
- Distinctive: line 75
No mitigation, no command that changes a live system (revert, reset, rollback, deploy, push, restart, scale, feature flag, config change), …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Incident
Stop the bleeding first, keep a timeline as you go, and never take a risky action without a yes.
1. Open the incident file — right away
Create incident-<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>.md in the current folder (UTC date; slug from the symptom, e.g. checkout-500s). If an incident file with Status: Open or Status: Mitigated already covers this problem, append to it instead. Keeping this file is part of the job; you don't need to ask before writing it.
# Incident: <short title>
Status: Open
Started: <YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM> UTC
Severity: <SEV1 | SEV2 | SEV3>
## Impact
<who or what is affected, since when>
## Timeline (UTC)
- <HH:MM> — <event>
## Actions
- [ ] <action> — <owner>Get times with date -u '+%H:%M'. Severity: SEV1 = most users or money affected, SEV2 = a key feature degraded, SEV3 = minor. Mark a guess with "(confirm)".
2. Triage
Ask at most 3 quick questions, only for what you can't find: what is broken, who is affected, since when.
3. Look for what changed
git log --since="24 hours ago" --format='%h %an %ar %s'
gh run list --limit 5 2>/dev/null # only with a GitHub remote, as the gh account picked below
git tag --sort=-creatordate | head -5gh account: the user may have several gh accounts, and the active one may not see this repo. Before the first gh call, list each account's access:
for u in $(gh auth status 2>&1 | sed -n 's/.*account \([^ ]*\).*/\1/p'); do echo "$u $(GH_TOKEN=$(gh auth token --user "$u") gh repo view --json viewerPermission -q .viewerPermission 2>/dev/null)"; done; truePick the first account with ADMIN, MAINTAIN or WRITE, else one with READ or TRIAGE. If none shows a permission, skip every gh call. Run every gh call as that account, GH_TOKEN=$(gh auth token --user <account>) gh ..., with 2>/dev/null. Never run gh auth switch.
Read the suspect diffs (git show <hash>). Match change times against when the symptom started.
4. Mitigate first
Propose the fastest safe mitigation — revert the suspect change, roll back the deploy, flip a feature flag, scale up — with the exact command. Never run any mitigation or any command that changes a live system (revert, reset, rollback, deploy, push, restart, scale, feature flag, config change), and never edit project code, without an explicit yes. Root cause can wait until users are OK.
5. Keep the timeline
Every finding, decision and action gets a timestamped line in the file. Facts, not blame: "config change deployed", not "X broke it".
6. Each reply during the incident
Status: <Open | Mitigated | Resolved> · Impact: <one line>
Next: <one step> — <command if any>
Need from you: <one thing, or "nothing">7. Close
When the user confirms it's fixed: set Status: Resolved, add the resolution to the timeline, tick done actions, and suggest the postmortem skill.
Rules
- Mitigation before root cause.
- No mitigation, no command that changes a live system (revert, reset, rollback, deploy, push, restart, scale, feature flag, config change), and no project code edit without an explicit yes.
- UTC times. Facts, not blame.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

