omg-audits
Skill1 starsChanged 55 days agoMITView on GitHub
Complete Quality Arsenal in one installable skill — 18 forensic Gestalt-Popper audits (code, security, performance, UX, accessibility, SEO, data, API, copy, DX, motion, flow, feature, automation, logic, retention, debug, refonte) plus intelligent orchestration, power levels, parallel waves, output templates, and a verification contract. Use when the user says "/omg-audits", "audit my project", "full audit", "quality audit", "audit complet", "is it production ready", "security audit", "performance audit", "design audit", "make it bulletproof", or names any single audit (codeaudit, secaudit, perfaudit, uiuxaudit, etc.). Self-contained: every audit protocol, orchestration doc, and template ships inside this skill.
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- ad-creativeSkill
- agent-ecosystem-watchSkill
- ai-logic-osSkill
- album-masteringSkill
- alexandriaSkill
- alignment-osSkill
- analyzing-financial-statementsSkill
- applying-brand-guidelinesSkill
- blueprint-osSkill
- brainstorm-osSkill
- builder-osSkill
- changelog-adoptSkill
- cleanupSkill
- cold-emailSkill
- content-strategySkill
- creating-financial-modelsSkill
- design-osSkill
- diagramSkill
- duoSkill
- execution-osSkill
- growth-engineSkill
- habit-tracker-osSkill
- higgsfield-generateSkill
- higgsfield-soul-idSkill
- identity-shift-osSkill
- intuitive-osSkill
- journal-osSkill
- launch-strategySkill
- marketing-strategistSkill
- market-research-osSkill
- market-researchSkill
- mindset-osSkill
- monitorSkill
- nuclear-cleanupSkill
- pixelragSkill
- product-marketing-contextSkill
- project-tidySkill
- ramflushSkill
- secrets-vaultSkill
- seductive-osSkill
- social-contentSkill
- staxSkill
- stepper-osSkill
- storyteller-osSkill
- watchSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 63
Before any audit, Read these two shared docs once per session:
- Distinctive: line 76
R-CITE: every finding carries a citation.
- Very specific: line 147
Read orchestration/ARSENAL-ORCHESTRATION-PLAYBOOK.md and ARSENAL-INTERCONNECTIONS.md for the full DAG.
- Very specific: line 162
In the Claude desktop app (solo): run audits sequentially within a wave (one chat, one after another), writing each verdict to …
- Very specific: line 181
All outputs live under audits/.{name}audit/ — never at project root.
- Very specific: line 199
Evidence or it didn't happen (R-CITE): Every claim = file:line / log line / screenshot.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/omg-audits — The Quality Arsenal (self-contained)
You are the conductor of the Quality Arsenal: 18 forensic audits that encode senior-engineer scrutiny into deterministic protocols, run ON the AI's own output before shipping. This skill bundles everything needed to run them — no external VPS infra required.
Why this exists. The bottleneck of AI-driven development isn't writing code — it's trusting it without re-reading every line. Each audit is a Gestalt-Popper protocol: form a holistic read (Gestalt), then try to falsify every claim (Popper), citing evidence (
file:line/log/screenshot) for everything. The output is production-grade confidence.
What ships in this skill
omg-audits/
├── SKILL.md ← you are here (orchestrator)
├── audits/ ← the 18 forensic protocols + 2 meta-tools
│ ├── codeaudit.md (24 phases, /420) secaudit.md (25 phases, /400)
│ ├── flowaudit.md (25 phases, /400) a11yaudit.md (21 phases, /320)
│ ├── uiuxaudit.md (/420) seoaudit.md (25 phases, /400)
│ ├── perfaudit.md (23 phases, /360) dataaudit.md (21 phases, /320)
│ ├── debugaudit.md (23 phases, /360) apiaudit.md (23 phases, /360)
│ ├── featureaudit.md(19 phases, /320) copyaudit.md (19 phases, /280)
│ ├── automationaudit.md (22, /400) dxaudit.md (21 phases, /320)
│ ├── logicaudit.md (20 phases, /360) motionaudit.md(23 phases, /360)
│ ├── retentionaudit.md (READ-ONLY,/400) refontaudit.md(25 phases, /540)
│ ├── metaudit.md (audits an audit) newaudit.md (scaffolds a new one)
├── orchestration/ ← shared source-of-truth docs
│ ├── QUALITY-ARSENAL-PREAMBLE.md AUDIT-VERIFICATION-CONTRACT.md
│ ├── ARSENAL-ORCHESTRATION-PLAYBOOK.md ARSENAL-INTERCONNECTIONS.md
│ ├── audit-orchestrator.md audit-tracker.md audit-mission.md audit-pilot.md
│ └── quality-arsenal.md
└── templates/ ← output contract
├── verdict.schema.json REPORT.template.md
├── fix-plan.template.json SYNTHESIS.template.mdTo run any single audit, Read audits/{name}audit.md and follow it exactly. Never paraphrase
a forensic protocol — read the real file. (Law L5: no streamlined/lightweight variant ever.)
STEP 0 — Always load the contract first
Before any audit, Read these two shared docs once per session:
Read orchestration/QUALITY-ARSENAL-PREAMBLE.md # the doctrine + Gestalt-Popper method
Read orchestration/AUDIT-VERIFICATION-CONTRACT.md # mandatory minimums + Hippocratic "do no harm"Non-negotiables from the contract (every audit honors them):
- ≥16 scored phases, each with evidence + a Popper falsification test.
- HINGE {DOMAIN} — identify the ONE element that dominates the domain's risk/value, give it 10× scrutiny.
- Score normalized to /100 (
raw / max * 100). - PRE-FIX baseline + before/after matrix →
before-after.md. No100/100claim with any regression. - Fix → re-audit loop, max 5 iterations.
- R-CITE: every finding carries a citation. Uncited = rejected.
- A 403/401/unreachable surface = ABORT, never PASS.
Routing
/omg-audits → show the menu (below), ask intent
/omg-audits <name> → run that single audit (Read audits/<name>audit.md)
/omg-audits full → all 18 in parallel waves (see Orchestration)
/omg-audits <preset> → run a curated bundle (see Presets)
/omg-audits status → read existing audits/.{name}audit/verdict.json and summarizeThe 18 audits — pick by question
| Audit | Answers | Native | When |
codeaudit | Is the code SOLID? | /420 | Pre-PR, refactor |
secaudit | Is it SECURE? (OWASP, XSS, auth, secrets) | /400 | Pre-launch, compliance |
perfaudit | Is it FAST? (CWV, bundles, N+1) | /360 | Slow app |
uiuxaudit | Is it BEAUTIFUL + coherent? | /420 | Design review |
a11yaudit | Is it ACCESSIBLE? (WCAG 2.1 AA) | /320 | Legal, inclusivity |
seoaudit | Is it DISCOVERABLE? (+ GEO/AEO) | /400 | Organic traffic |
dataaudit | Is the data INTACT? (DESTRUCTIVE — backs up first) | /320 | DB integrity |
apiaudit | Is the API SOLID? (contracts, auth) | /360 | Backend, integrations |
copyaudit | Is the copy CLEAR? (claims, tone, i18n) | /280 | Messaging |
dxaudit | Is the DX SMOOTH? (onboarding, README) | /320 | CLI/library projects |
motionaudit | Is the motion PURPOSEFUL? (ABORTS on non-UI) | /360 | Animation polish |
flowaudit | Does the EXPERIENCE work? (journeys, edge cases) | /400 | Full UX |
featureaudit | Is the product COMPLETE? (vs PRD) | /320 | Gap analysis |
automationaudit | Is automation RELIABLE? (cron, scripts, daemons) | /400 | Infra health |
logicaudit | Is the logic OPTIMAL? (architecture, waste) | /360 | System optimization |
debugaudit | What is BROKEN right now? (runtime bugs) | /360 | Bug hunt |
retentionaudit | What FEATURES are missing? (READ-ONLY, RICE) | /400 | CPO mindset |
refontaudit | Should the dashboard be REDESIGNED? (shadcn) | /540 | "Comme Linear/Vercel" |
Meta-tools: metaudit (grade an audit skill itself), newaudit (scaffold a new audit).
Three power levels
| Level | Time | Pipeline | Use |
| ⚡ Quick | 5–15 min | Audit only, top-5 findings | gut-check, demo prep |
| 🎯 Standard (default) | 30–60 min | Audit → Plan → Fix → Re-audit | weekly cycle, pre-PR |
| 🔬 Forensic | 1–4 h | Full Gestalt-Popper, auto-fix loop until 100/100 or 5 iterations | pre-launch, compliance |
State the level in scope when you start. When unsure, default to Standard (Law L5: never silently downgrade).
Presets
/omg-audits go-live → secaudit + a11yaudit + perfaudit + dataaudit (ship trio + GDPR)
/omg-audits ship-ready → featureaudit + debugaudit + dxaudit
/omg-audits investor → uiuxaudit + featureaudit + retentionaudit + copyaudit
/omg-audits redesign → refontaudit + uiuxaudit + motionaudit
/omg-audits security → secaudit + apiaudit + dataaudit
/omg-audits performance → perfaudit + seoaudit
/omg-audits design → uiuxaudit + motionaudit + a11yaudit + copyaudit
/omg-audits new-dev → dxaudit + codeauditOrchestration — full mode (parallel waves)
Read orchestration/ARSENAL-ORCHESTRATION-PLAYBOOK.md and ARSENAL-INTERCONNECTIONS.md for the
full DAG. The dependency-aware wave plan:
Wave 1 — read-only foundation, max parallelism:
codeaudit · logicaudit · dataaudit · apiaudit · seoaudit · featureaudit · retentionaudit · copyaudit · dxaudit
Wave 2 — consume Wave-1 verdicts (secaudit reads apiaudit + dataaudit verdicts; perfaudit feeds seoaudit):
secaudit · perfaudit · debugaudit · automationaudit
Wave 3 — UI bundle:
uiuxaudit · motionaudit · a11yaudit · flowaudit
Wave Final — refontaudit (only if redesign requested).
How to run a wave
- In the Claude desktop app (solo): run audits sequentially within a wave (one chat,
one after another), writing each verdict to
audits/.{name}audit/verdict.jsonas you go. There is no worker dispatch on desktop — you ARE the single runner. Quality is identical; only wall-clock differs. - In a multi-session/agent environment: dispatch each audit in a wave as a parallel
sub-agent (file-disjoint → safe to parallelize; same-file fixes serialize per R-SCOPE).
dataauditis DESTRUCTIVE (writes) — it must hold a backup gate before any other audit touches the DB.
After all waves
- Aggregate every
verdict.jsonintoaudits/SYNTHESIS.mdusingtemplates/SYNTHESIS.template.md. - Overall grade = mean of normalized scores; flag anything < 80, block anything ABORT.
- Order fixes by severity × blast radius across audits (cross-cutting findings first).
- Present the synthesis + recommended fix order.
Output contract (every audit, every time)
All outputs live under audits/.{name}audit/ — never at project root. The 8-file spec:
| File | Purpose | Template |
verdict.json | machine-readable verdict (score, hinge, findings) | templates/verdict.schema.json |
REPORT.md | human forensic report | templates/REPORT.template.md |
fix-plan.json / fix-plan.md | ordered, surgical fixes | templates/fix-plan.template.json |
before-after.md | Hippocratic proof — 0 regressions to claim 100/100 | (contract) |
iterations.md | fix→re-audit loop log | — |
progress.json | live progress | — |
telemetry.json | timings/scores | — |
audits/SYNTHESIS.md aggregates them all (template provided).
Standing rules (apply to every audit)
- Evidence or it didn't happen (R-CITE). Every claim =
file:line/ log line / screenshot. - Runtime is the only truth (L1). Code states intent; only running it reveals reality. Verify with real output.
- Researcher, not sycophant (L2). Challenge a flawed premise with reasoning before fixing.
- Quality over speed (L5). Tokens unlimited, time isn't a constraint. No "streamlined/quick/custom" variant of a real audit. A 403/401/down surface is an ABORT, never a PASS.
- Do no harm. A fix that breaks a working thing is a failure regardless of score gain.
- Done means 100%, verified (L4). Enumerate every requested audit, finish each, self-verify against runtime before claiming done.
Quick start
1. Read orchestration/QUALITY-ARSENAL-PREAMBLE.md + AUDIT-VERIFICATION-CONTRACT.md
2. Pick audits (single name, a preset, or `full`) and a power level.
3. For each audit: Read audits/{name}audit.md → run it phase-by-phase → write verdict.json + REPORT.md.
4. (Standard/Forensic) Generate fix-plan → apply surgical fixes → re-audit → before-after.md.
5. Aggregate into SYNTHESIS.md, flag <80, block ABORT, present fix order.Public mirror & docs: https://github.com/agentik-os/claude-code-quality-audits Agentik OS — Chief AI Officer as a Service — https://agentik-os.com
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

