product-design
Skill1 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create or revise user journeys, screens, components, and design systems. Use for UX flow design, interface design, interaction states, or visual refinement; use design-quality for a dedicated audit of existing designs.
26 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lklimek/claudiustheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- thensls/nsls-builder-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- fracazo/design-systemtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lobehub/lobehubtheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- Cure-Consulting-Group/ProductEngineeringSkillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- MasihMoafi/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ux-audit and i18n.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
shmehroSkillux-audit
Perform a heuristic UX audit on a UI screen, flow, or component description
Also in 3 projects that use this
lbednerSkilli18n
Use when a code or template change introduces a new translation message key, in either the framework CLI (aegis/i18n/locales/) or a generated project's CLI (the app/i18n/locales/ template tree). Covers adding the real English string, stubbing the same key into every other locale for parity, and the separate translation PR that later replaces placeholders with reviewed native text.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions26 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 26
- lobehub/lobe-chat★ 84ksame name
- lobehub/lobehub★ 84ksame name
- alekspetrov/navigator★ 355same name
- qf-studio/navigator★ 355same name
- duyet/clickhouse-monitoring★ 303same name
- github/replica★ 230same name
- mblode/agent-skills★ 189same name
- chuhaiqu/skills★ 22same name
- vercel-labs/arcade★ 21same name
- yoyothesheep/claude-skills★ 16same name
16 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- templates/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- code-qualitySkill
- data-integritySkill
- design-qualitySkill
- feature-deliverySkill
- growth-strategySkill
- performance-reviewSkill
- product-planningSkill
- product-qualitySkill
- release-engineeringSkill
- security-auditSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 21 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
When the project has a shared design specification, maintain foundations and cross-feature patterns there and link feature-specific flows …
- Distinctive: line 29
Use the deliverable requested: flow description, wireframe, design-file changes, prototype or implementation.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 21 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Product design
Design an understandable, coherent experience for the intended audience and task. Respect the user's visual direction and established product behaviour.
Understand the design context
Inspect the relevant brief, screen/flow references, design tokens, components and target platforms. Discover the project's actual files and tools; do not assume Figma access, a particular framework or a mobile-first product. Inspect reference images before describing or recreating their details.
Identify the user's goal, primary action, information needed to decide, entry/exit points and constraints. Existing tokens and components take precedence over generic styling preferences. For a new product, propose a small coherent visual foundation before proliferating screens.
When the project has a shared design specification, maintain foundations and cross-feature patterns there and link feature-specific flows to it. Identify the approved reference revision, supported environments, acceptance targets and reviewer; do not treat a template or an unreviewed mockup as an approved design.
Design the experience
- Map the journey and meaningful alternatives, including cancel/back, interruption, validation and recovery. Keep technical implementation details out of product copy unless users need them to decide.
- Establish hierarchy, navigation and a deliberate visual direction: typography, spacing, color, imagery and motion tied to the audience and product. Premium quality comes from clear, consistent execution; choose decoration only when it serves the brief.
- Reuse or extend existing components with purposeful variants. Give new global components a real reuse/ownership reason. Keep one authoritative token system.
- Design the relevant loading, empty, error, disabled, success and permission states. Use realistic variable-length content, not only ideal mock data.
- Account for target widths, safe areas, keyboard, scrolling, text scaling, locales, assistive technology and reduced motion. Do not shrink critical text or targets merely to match a mockup.
- Explain trust signals, prices, consent and irreversible actions accurately. Label unverified claims and sponsored content according to product requirements; avoid deceptive urgency or hidden choices.
Produce and inspect the result
Use the deliverable requested: flow description, wireframe, design-file changes, prototype or implementation. Use available tool-specific guidance for the selected medium. Inspect the actual rendered result when possible, checking affected states and representative widths. A source-code read is not visual inspection.
Record new business behaviour as a requirement proposal rather than silently introducing it through a screen. Continue requested implementation when authorized; a design-only request does not authorize app changes or publishing.
Deliver
Link the design/artifact, explain the main choices, identify reused or added components, and report the visual/interaction checks actually performed. Flag open behaviours and untested platforms. Self-review is part of creation; a dedicated design-quality pass can independently compare the result with requirements.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

