work
Skill0 starsChanged 46 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run the full idea-to-shipped-code pipeline for a new feature or fix — grill requirements, brainstorm/design, write tests first, implement, iterate until green, then a thermo-nuclear code quality review. Use when the user wants to "just build" something end-to-end rather than run each step by hand, or explicitly invokes /work.
42 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Firzus/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- isanchez-aguilar/relayrace-aitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Mharbulous/probanda-devtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Jasenpan1987/multi-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- withpiper/pipekittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- cekrauseee/harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use authoring, done and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
automagik-devSkillauthoring
Write or revise a Genie skill so it survives the shipped contract — frontmatter, house size, starter card, and runtime-neutral voice.
Also in 3 projects that use this
robzolkosSkilldone
Reset the working directory for the next task by ensuring no uncommitted changes exist, then switching to the main branch and pulling latest.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Google CloudSkillfix
Plan a remediation strategy after a test failure.
Also in 4 projects that use this
AlexPEClubSkillrefine
Always use when the user wants to discuss an exsiting feature or specification. Open an existing feature spec to improve, extend, or fundamentally challenge it. Pass the feature ID as argument (e.g. /refine PROJ-2).
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillmerge
Merge changes from the topic branch to the merge base branch. Use when the user wants to merge their session's work back to the base branch.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkilltest
Also in 6 projects that use this
Other versions42 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 42
- cwinvestments/memstack★ 425same name
- automagik-dev/genie★ 351same name
- namastexlabs/automagik-genie★ 351same name
- ohad6k/emulo★ 292same name
- first-fluke/fullstack-starter★ 226same name
- OutThisLife/brooklyn-skills★ 207same name
- guardana/guardana★ 203same name
- Towow-ai/Flowness★ 107same name
- assaio/assaio★ 63same name
- HubSpot/agent-cli-skills★ 28same name
32 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- brainstormingSkill
- commit-messageSkill
- dev-verifySkill
- diff-reviewSkill
- env-doctorSkill
- fix-bugSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- refactorSkill
- ship-featureSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 37 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
If brainstorming escalates to architectural and calls for the writing-plans skill, that skill isn't installed here.
- Distinctive: line 22
Run the steps in order. Don't reorder or skip one because the request "looks simple" — that call belongs to the grill/brainstorm steps …
- Distinctive: line 23
If any step's own gate isn't met (e.g.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 37 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Work
Chains five existing skills into one fixed pipeline. Each step's own hard gates (approvals, STOP conditions) still apply in full — this skill sequences them, it does not skip or soften them.
Pipeline
- Grill — Skill(
mattpocock-skills:grilling). Interview the user until the design tree is settled: what's being built, for whom, the constraints. Do this first, even if the request already looks simple. - Brainstorm — Skill(
brainstorming). Hand it what the grill settled. Let it classify the work itself (spike / bounded / architectural) and run its own approval gate — the grill answering "what" doesn't satisfy brainstorming's separate "present design, get approval" step; that still has to happen.- If brainstorming escalates to architectural and calls for the
writing-plansskill, that skill isn't installed here. Stop and tell the user rather than inventing a plan-document format or skipping the step.
- If brainstorming escalates to architectural and calls for the
- Tests first — Skill(
mattpocock-skills:tdd). Only once the design is approved: write the failing tests for it before any implementation code (the red half of the TDD loop). - Implement — Skill(
mattpocock-skills:implement), against the approved design and the tests just written. It will itself lean on TDD at pre-agreed seams — expected, not a deviation. - Iterate to green — keep implementing/fixing and rerunning the suite until every test this pipeline wrote passes, plus a typecheck if the project has one. Don't advance to step 6 on a red suite.
- Review — with tests green, run Skill(
thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review). This replacesimplement's own suggested/code-reviewstep — this pipeline's review is the strict one.
Notes
- Run the steps in order. Don't reorder or skip one because the request "looks simple" — that call belongs to the grill/brainstorm steps themselves, not to this wrapper.
- If any step's own gate isn't met (e.g. brainstorming's bounded/architectural approval), stop there and wait. This skill grants no blanket authorization to bypass a downstream skill's gate.
- Branching/committing follows whatever this repo's own git conventions are (see the
git-workflowskill where installed) —workdoesn't add its own branch or commit handling on top.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

