runbook-writer
Skill0 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when writing or improving an operational runbook for an alert, service, or recurring failure. Mention "write a runbook", "runbook for this alert", "on-call doc" as triggers.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jars-demo/jars-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- 45ck/deployment-release-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 28, 2026
- 00PrabalK00/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 16, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- 00PrabalK00/claude-skills★ 1same name
- 45ck/deployment-release-skills★ 1same name
- jars-demo/jars-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- admission-policy-reviewSkill
- alert-rule-reviewSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- argocd-applicationsetSkill
- argocd-debugSkill
- argocdSkill
- cert-manager-debugSkill
- cicd-reviewSkill
- cilium-debugSkill
- ciliumSkill
- cluster-backupSkill
- dast-reviewSkill
- dockerfile-reviewSkill
- english-technical-messageSkill
- git-messageSkill
- gitops-reviewSkill
- go-bugfixSkill
- go-code-reviewSkill
- go-testing-reviewSkill
- grafana-dashboardsSkill
- helm-reviewSkill
- homelab-change-planSkill
- incident-analysisSkill
- ingressSkill
- interview-system-designSkill
- istio-debugSkill
- istioSkill
- kubernetes-autoscalingSkill
- kubernetes-debugSkill
- kubernetes-securitySkill
- kubernetes-yaml-reviewSkill
- migration-planSkill
- observability-reviewSkill
- observability-stackSkill
- production-readinessSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- root-cause-analysisSkill
- runtime-security-reviewSkill
- secrets-managementSkill
- storage-debugSkill
- supply-chain-securitySkill
- terraform-reviewSkill
- upgrade-readinessSkill
- vaultSkill
- vulnerability-triageSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Read the alert rule, dashboards, logs, and existing recovery instructions.
- Distinctive: line 22
Do not offer an invasive command without a condition and a recovery path.
- Distinctive: line 26
Follow the Workflow, Safety rules, and Quality checklist below.
- Distinctive: line 36
Use when an alert, service, or recurring incident needs a runbook — or when an existing runbook failed the on-call engineer during the last …
- Very specific: line 51
Write the diagnosis sequence: ordered, copy-pasteable, read-only commands (kubectl/logs/ PromQL/dashboard links), each with one line saying …
- Distinctive: line 54
Write mitigations mapped to diagnoses: "if you saw X in step 3, do Y." Start with the safest effective action (scale up, feature-flag off, …
- Very specific: line 57
NOT to run it. Rollbacks/restarts/deletions never appear bare.
- Very specific: line 67
Do not run any of the commands while writing the runbook — this skill produces a document, not an intervention.
- Distinctive: line 70
Every mutating command must carry an explicit warning and a "when not to do this" note.
- Very specific: line 71
Do not invent thresholds, dashboard URLs, or team names — take them from provided context or leave a clearly marked TODO(owner) placeholder.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Runbook Writer
TL;DR checklist
- State the triggering alert and user impact.
- Put ordered read-only diagnosis before action.
- Map each mitigation to the evidence that justifies it.
Key read-only checks
- Read the alert rule, dashboards, logs, and existing recovery instructions.
Common pitfalls
- Do not offer an invasive command without a condition and a recovery path.
Agent procedure
Follow the Workflow, Safety rules, and Quality checklist below.
Quick references
- Workflow below.
Last verified: unverified
When to use
Use when an alert, service, or recurring incident needs a runbook — or when an existing runbook failed the on-call engineer during the last incident and needs fixing.
Goal
Produce a runbook a half-awake on-call engineer who has never touched this service can follow at 3 AM: what fired, what it means for users, exactly what to check, and exactly what to do — copy-pasteable, in order, with destructive steps unmistakably marked.
Workflow
- Identify the trigger: which alert(s) or symptom this runbook covers, and what the alert condition actually means in plain language.
- State user impact honestly: what is broken for whom while this fires, and how urgent it really is (drives whether the reader pages someone else or has coffee first).
- Write the diagnosis sequence: ordered, copy-pasteable, read-only commands (kubectl/logs/ PromQL/dashboard links), each with one line saying what output means what. Order by likelihood × cheapness — most likely cause checked first.
- Write mitigations mapped to diagnoses: "if you saw X in step 3, do Y." Start with the safest effective action (scale up, feature-flag off, shift traffic) before invasive ones.
- Mark every mutating command with an explicit warning line stating what it changes and when NOT to run it. Rollbacks/restarts/deletions never appear bare.
- Define escalation: when to stop (time-boxed — e.g. "15 minutes without progress"), who to page (team/role, not a person's name), and what context to hand over.
- Define verification: how to confirm recovery (the metric/query that should return to normal) — not just "the alert stopped firing."
- Link related material: dashboard, recent incidents of this class, architecture doc, the alert rule definition itself.
Safety rules
- Do not run any of the commands while writing the runbook — this skill produces a document, not
an intervention. Verify command syntax against the manifests/config available, and mark
anything unverifiable as
# UNVERIFIED — check before relying on this. - Every mutating command must carry an explicit warning and a "when not to do this" note.
- Do not invent thresholds, dashboard URLs, or team names — take them from provided context or
leave a clearly marked
TODO(owner)placeholder.
Output format
# Runbook: <alert or failure name>
## Alert / trigger
## User impact & urgency
## Diagnosis (in order)
1. <command> — <what result means>
## Mitigation
- If <diagnosis result>: <action> ⚠️ marked if mutating
## Escalation
## Verify recovery
## LinksQuality checklist
- Every diagnosis command is copy-pasteable and read-only
- Every mutating command has a warning and a "when not to" note
- Escalation is time-boxed with a concrete page target
- Recovery verification is a concrete signal, not "alert resolved"
- Unknown values are marked TODO, not invented
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

