production-readiness
Skill0 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when checking whether an app, service, Kubernetes deployment, Helm chart, Terraform module, or GitOps app is ready to run in production. Mention "production readiness", "is this ready to ship", "prod checklist" as triggers.
17 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- KbWen/agentic-ostheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemontheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- gilsmt/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- Gladiarn/Glad-Personaltheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- trycompai/comptheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- kleosr/bridletheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use observability, testing and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
OpenAISkillobservability
Vercel Observability expert guidance — Drains (logs, traces, speed insights, web analytics), Web Analytics, Speed Insights, runtime logs, custom events, OpenTelemetry integration, and monitoring dashboards. Use when instrumenting, debugging, or optimizing application performance and user experience on Vercel.
Also in 3 projects that use this
NVIDIASkilltesting
Run Python and Rust tests for physicsnemo-curator using uv + pytest with coverage reporting via pytest-cov, and cargo-nextest for Rust tests. Includes benchmark workflows with pytest-benchmark and criterion.
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillsystematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions17 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 17
- trycompai/comp★ 2.1ksame name
- KbWen/agentic-os★ 229same name
- magnus919/agent-skills★ 172same name
- KbWen/agent-virtual-office★ 65same name
- suhailkakar/the-skills★ 26same name
- caiaffa/claude-code-ultimate-engineering-system★ 17same name
- wpank/ai★ 11same name
- dekoza/oh-my-slop★ 4same name
- Gladiarn/Glad-Personal★ 4same name
- gilsmt/skills★ 2same name
7 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository45 other files it gives its agents.
- admission-policy-reviewSkill
- alert-rule-reviewSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- argocd-applicationsetSkill
- argocd-debugSkill
- argocdSkill
- cert-manager-debugSkill
- cicd-reviewSkill
- cilium-debugSkill
- ciliumSkill
- cluster-backupSkill
- dast-reviewSkill
- dockerfile-reviewSkill
- english-technical-messageSkill
- git-messageSkill
- gitops-reviewSkill
- go-bugfixSkill
- go-code-reviewSkill
- go-testing-reviewSkill
- grafana-dashboardsSkill
- helm-reviewSkill
- homelab-change-planSkill
- incident-analysisSkill
- ingressSkill
- interview-system-designSkill
- istio-debugSkill
- istioSkill
- kubernetes-autoscalingSkill
- kubernetes-debugSkill
- kubernetes-securitySkill
- kubernetes-yaml-reviewSkill
- migration-planSkill
- observability-reviewSkill
- observability-stackSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- root-cause-analysisSkill
- runbook-writerSkill
- runtime-security-reviewSkill
- secrets-managementSkill
- storage-debugSkill
- supply-chain-securitySkill
- terraform-reviewSkill
- upgrade-readinessSkill
- vaultSkill
- vulnerability-triageSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Treat missing rollback or DR as high risk.
- Distinctive: line 26
Follow the Workflow, Safety rules, and Quality checklist below.
- Distinctive: line 36
Use before something goes live, or during a periodic readiness review of an existing service, Kubernetes workload, Helm chart, Terraform …
- Distinctive: line 48
Check deployment safety: rollout strategy, readiness/liveness gating, canary or staged rollout, and a documented or automated rollback path.
- Distinctive: line 50
Check observability: structured logs, key metrics (RED/USE), dashboards, and alerts tied to user-facing symptoms, not just infrastructure …
- Distinctive: line 52
Check security: least-privilege access, secrets handling, network exposure, dependency/ image scanning status.
- Distinctive: line 54
Check resourcing: requests/limits (K8s), autoscaling, and capacity headroom for expected load.
- Distinctive: line 56
Check resilience: probes, timeouts/retries, graceful shutdown, backup/restore, and — for stateful systems — a tested disaster-recovery path.
- Distinctive: line 58
Check operability: config/secrets separated from code, runbook or on-call documentation exists, and someone other than the author can …
- Distinctive: line 73
Do not claim something is "production-ready" without checking it — call out anything you couldn't verify (e.g.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Production Readiness
TL;DR checklist
- Identify the artifact and its release path.
- Check rollout, observability, security, capacity, resilience, and rollback.
- Name remaining blockers with concrete verification evidence.
Key read-only checks
- Inspect deploy configuration, alerts, capacity assumptions, backups, and test evidence.
Common pitfalls
- Treat missing rollback or DR as high risk; check for tested DR in stateful systems.
Agent procedure
Follow the Workflow, Safety rules, and Quality checklist below.
Quick references
- references/checklists.md
Last verified: unverified
When to use
Use before something goes live, or during a periodic readiness review of an existing service, Kubernetes workload, Helm chart, Terraform module, or GitOps-managed app.
Goal
Identify concrete gaps between the current state and what's needed to run safely in production, ranked by risk — not a generic checklist recital.
Workflow
- Identify what kind of artifact this is (app/service, K8s workload, Helm chart, Terraform module, GitOps app) and load the relevant lens below.
- Check deployment safety: rollout strategy, readiness/liveness gating, canary or staged rollout, and a documented or automated rollback path.
- Check observability: structured logs, key metrics (RED/USE), dashboards, and alerts tied to user-facing symptoms, not just infrastructure noise.
- Check security: least-privilege access, secrets handling, network exposure, dependency/ image scanning status.
- Check resourcing: requests/limits (K8s), autoscaling, and capacity headroom for expected load.
- Check resilience: probes, timeouts/retries, graceful shutdown, backup/restore, and — for stateful systems — a tested disaster-recovery path.
- Check operability: config/secrets separated from code, runbook or on-call documentation exists, and someone other than the author can operate this.
- Rank every gap found by risk (what breaks, how badly, how likely) — not by how easy it is to fix.
References
references/checklists.md— deep per-artifact checklists (Kubernetes workload operational layer, stateful/restore-is-the-deliverable, Terraform state protection, GitOps promotion and bootstrap, observability and documentation gates), each item tied to the concrete failure it prevents.
Safety rules
- This is a review skill: do not deploy, apply, or provision anything.
- Do not claim something is "production-ready" without checking it — call out anything you couldn't verify (e.g. no access to metrics/dashboards) as unverified.
- Flag missing rollback or DR capability as high risk even if everything else looks good — it is the check most often skipped.
Output format
## Scope
<what was reviewed>
## Blocking gaps
- <gap> — risk: <what breaks / who's affected> — fix: <concrete action>
## Should-fix before scale
- ...
## Nice-to-have
- ...
## Not verified
<things that couldn't be checked from available context>Quality checklist
- Rollback/DR path was explicitly checked, not assumed
- Every gap states the concrete failure it enables, not just "missing X"
- Findings are ranked by risk, not by ease of fix
- Unverifiable items are listed separately rather than silently skipped
- No deploy/apply action was taken
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

