agentleFS
aakashdharaakashdhar/vibe-skill/vibe-parallel/SKILL.md

vibe-parallel

Skill7 starsChanged 13 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Parallel task execution using Claude Code subagents. Reads task files, builds dependency waves, detects file conflicts AND read-write conflicts, and spawns tasks as parallel subagents. Size-aware wave splitting unlocks downstream tasks early when large tasks are in the same wave as small ones. If vibe-graph is installed, each subagent gets a graph-derived focus block (blast-radius files + rationale) on top of a shared cached baseline — precise scoping without blind spots, cheap via prompt caching. Structured subagent reporting with [x]/[~]/[!] states. Diagnostic retry on failure. Live wave progress log at vibe/parallel/. Post-wave graph update. Wave cost annotation for vibe-cost. Triggers on "parallel:" prefix, "run tasks in parallel", "spawn subagents", "parallelise the build", "which tasks can run in parallel", "run independent tasks simultaneously". Invoked by vibe-mode's autonomous-execution block (which vibe-new-app, vibe-add-feature, and vibe-fix-bug hand off to when VIBE_MODE=autonomous), or directly when the user runs `parallel:`. In manual mode the build skills do not call it automatically — the user opts in.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

42 rules. About 0 are common, 17 are distinctive, and 25 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈17

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 25

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.