agentleFS
aakashdharaakashdhar/vibe-skill/vibe-graph/SKILL.md

vibe-graph

Skill7 starsChanged 13 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Dual-layer dependency graph for vibe-* projects. No external packages. DEPENDENCY_GRAPH.json maps file-level relationships with confidence tagging: EXTRACTED (verified from source, confidence 1.0), INFERRED (derived from specs/patterns, 0.6–0.95), AMBIGUOUS (flagged for review). Rationale nodes capture WHY, HACK, DECISION comments from source files — surfaced during bug diagnosis and review to prevent intent drift. God nodes identify highest-coupling files — read first in review, flagged in bug diagnosis, blocked from simultaneous parallel writes. CONCEPT_GRAPH.json maps semantic relationships (features, agents, models, components). graph.html is an interactive visual. Auto-updated via git diff. Queried by vibe-fix-bug, vibe-test, vibe-review, vibe-parallel. Primary value is semantic navigation: accurate blast-radius, intent-drift detection via rationale nodes, and safe parallel dispatch via god nodes — not raw token savings (current models have large context windows + prompt caching, so the graph is a precision/focus overlay, not a way to avoid loading context). Triggers on "vibe-graph: build", "vibe-graph: update", "vibe-graph: init", "vibe-graph: rebuild", "vibe-graph: query", "vibe-graph: status".

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

37 rules. About 0 are common, 17 are distinctive, and 20 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈17

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 20

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.