agentleFS
aakashdharaakashdhar/vibe-skill/vibe-architect/SKILL.md

vibe-architect

Skill7 starsChanged 13 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Architecture planning workflow for establishing code structure, patterns, and principles before any code is written. Runs after brainstorm: and before new: on every project. Triggers on "architect:" prefix, "plan the architecture", "architect this", "how should we structure this", "what patterns should we use". Runs on every project — architecture is never skipped (it can proceed without BRIEF.md by asking the stack questions directly, but the architecture step itself is not optional). Reads BRIEF.md stack decisions and confirms them explicitly before asking any questions — prevents scaffolding with wrong framework (e.g. Next.js when React+Vite is specified). Produces ARCHITECTURE.md from canonical template — structurally consistent so review:, fix-bug:, and add-feature: can parse it reliably every session. review: uses ARCHITECTURE.md as its primary reference for drift detection. Handles gracefully if BRIEF.md is missing. Detects existing ARCHITECTURE.md before overwriting.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

24 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈16

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.