wct-review
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Review code and diffs against WCT architecture, minimalism, testing, dependency, and security policy. Use for code review, pull-request review, agent handoff review, or investigating whether a passing change still violates human-only rules.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/wct.mdcCursor rule
- wct-acceptanceSkill
- wct-adoptSkill
- wct-architectureSkill
- wct-crapSkill
- wct-dependenciesSkill
- wct-doctorSkill
- wct-drySkill
- wct-gateSkill
- wct-hardeningSkill
- wct-mutateSkill
- wct-ratchetSkill
- wct-reviewSkill
- wct-securitySkill
- wct-test-honestySkill
- wct-acceptanceSkill
- wct-adoptSkill
- wct-architectureSkill
- wct-crapSkill
- wct-dependenciesSkill
- wct-doctorSkill
- wct-drySkill
- wct-gateSkill
- wct-hardeningSkill
- wct-mutateSkill
- wct-ratchetSkill
- wct-securitySkill
- wct-test-honestySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Read governance/policy.yaml, thresholds.yaml, and the relevant files under governance/rules/.
- Very specific: line 10
Run uv run wct gate --tier commit and uv run wct dry --json.
- Very specific: line 11
Check rules marked verified_by: [human] explicitly: semantic correctness, information hiding, names, accessibility, and root cause.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Review hardened code
- Read
governance/policy.yaml,thresholds.yaml, and the relevant files undergovernance/rules/. - Inspect the complete changed flow and every caller before judging the diff.
- Run
uv run wct gate --tier commitanduv run wct dry --json. - Check rules marked
verified_by: [human]explicitly: semantic correctness, information hiding, names, accessibility, and root cause. - Lead with concrete findings ordered by severity and include file/line evidence. Do not rewrite code unless asked.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.