wct-hardening
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Execute the full Uncle Bob-inspired WCT hardening sequence. Use for release readiness, hardener-role handoff, high-risk changes, or requests to fully validate code after implementation and architectural review.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/wct.mdcCursor rule
- wct-acceptanceSkill
- wct-adoptSkill
- wct-architectureSkill
- wct-crapSkill
- wct-dependenciesSkill
- wct-doctorSkill
- wct-drySkill
- wct-gateSkill
- wct-hardeningSkill
- wct-mutateSkill
- wct-ratchetSkill
- wct-reviewSkill
- wct-securitySkill
- wct-test-honestySkill
- wct-acceptanceSkill
- wct-adoptSkill
- wct-architectureSkill
- wct-crapSkill
- wct-dependenciesSkill
- wct-doctorSkill
- wct-drySkill
- wct-gateSkill
- wct-mutateSkill
- wct-ratchetSkill
- wct-reviewSkill
- wct-securitySkill
- wct-test-honestySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Run strictly in this order and fix each stage before continuing:
- Distinctive: line 16
Use at most eight mutation workers.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Perform hardening
Run strictly in this order and fix each stage before continuing:
uv run wct mutate runuv run wct accept mutate- Generate LCOV and run
crap4py ... --max-crap 6 uv run wct dry --jsonuv run wct gate --tier full
Use at most eight mutation workers. Require zero survivors and report every optional gate that skipped.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.