agentleFS
YosoyepaYosoyepa/write-check-trust/skills/wct-mutate/SKILL.md

wct-mutate

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Run WCT differential mutation analysis and eliminate surviving mutants. Use after behavior changes, when coverage looks suspiciously easy, for G-MUT or G-MUT-SITES failures, and before hardening handoff.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run uv run wct mutate scan.

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    Run uv run wct mutate run.

    line 9
  3. Very specific:

    Only after green, run uv run wct mutate update-manifest and include the manifest with the verified change.

    line 12

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Harden with mutation

  1. Run uv run wct mutate scan; split any changed file above 100 mutation sites for behavioral reasons.
  2. Run uv run wct mutate run; the manifest selects changed functions.
  3. For uncovered mutants, add a test that reaches the behavior. For survivors, strengthen assertions or simplify equivalent code.
  4. Require zero survivors in changed code.
  5. Only after green, run uv run wct mutate update-manifest and include the manifest with the verified change.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.