fix-merge-conflicts
Skill41k starsChanged 4 days agoMITView on GitHub
Resolve merge conflicts non-interactively: start the integration, read both sides' intent from their commits, preserve both intents, validate on the resolved tree. Never force-pushes shared branches.
12 other projects use a version of this.
Trending
Quiet since January.thin dataabout the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- catesandrew/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodeword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ArchitektApx/cursor-skills-for-claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Scino/fstacktheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- jaydubya818/MissionControltheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- dhanji4U/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
Who's talking about Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus
- A Hacker News story“Sisyphus Now Lives in Oh My Claude”Hacker News · Jan 11, 2026 · 52 points
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode“Silent update security issue”GitHub · Jan 10, 2026 · 1 reactions
- anthropics/claude-plugins-official“feat: Add oh-my-claude-sisyphus multi-agent orchestration plugin”GitHub · Jan 12, 2026
The biggest 3 of 3 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
Used with
Projects with it also use check-compiler-errors, new-branch-and-pr and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
cogine-aiSkillcheck-compiler-errors
Run compile and type-check commands and report failures
Also in 3 projects that use this
cogine-aiSkillnew-branch-and-pr
Create a fresh branch, complete work, and open a pull request
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillrun-smoke-tests
Run smoke tests to verify extension functionality in a real VS Code environment. Use this when checking if basic features work after changes.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ArthurMor4isSkillreview-and-ship
Implement changes, use `/review-bugbot` before pushing, fix critical issues, then handle the full Git + GitHub workflow — branch, commit, push, PR. Use when the user wants to ship with validation, says "review and ship", "ship after review", "run bugbot then push", "review before PR", or asks to implement a feature/fix and submit it only after a Bugbot pass. Prefer this over `ship` when code quality review is expected before the PR goes up.
Also in 3 projects that use this
learnerLjSkillverify-this
Verify a claim with fresh local evidence: restate it falsifiably, capture baseline and treatment, compare artifacts, and return VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INCONCLUSIVE.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +1 more from cogine-ai
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- cashew-labs/libretto★ 898same name
- saffron-health/libretto★ 883same name
- ulises-jeremias/agent-toolkit★ 19same name
- Scino/fstack★ 18same name
- cogine-ai/cogine-dev-skillset★ 4same name
- dhanji4U/skills★ 2same name
- jaydubya818/MissionControl★ 2same name
- catesandrew/skills★ 1same name
- ElyzeSolutions/skills★ 1same name
- RoyBkker/agent-skills★ 1same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository90 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- src/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- commandsSkill
- agent-doc-disciplineSkill
- ai-slop-cleanerSkill
- architectSkill
- architecture-surveySkill
- arenaSkill
- ask-navigatorSkill
- askSkill
- autopilotSkill
- autoresearchSkill
- babysitSkill
- benchmark-checklistSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- broSkill
- cancelSkill
- configure-notificationsSkill
- correctSkill
- create-formal-verification-skillSkill
- create-verification-skillSkill
- debugSkill
- deepinitSkill
- deep-interviewSkill
- diagramSkill
- drydockSkill
- executeSkill
- external-contextSkill
- figure-it-outSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- get-pr-commentsSkill
- graphSkill
- harborSkill
- hillclimbSkill
- howSkill
- hudSkill
- intentSkill
- interrogateSkill
- in-your-own-wordsSkill
- ketchupSkill
- ketchup-videoSkill
- launchSkill
- loftSkill
- maintain-formal-verification-skillSkill
- maintain-verification-skillSkill
- mapSkill
- minimal-code-disciplineSkill
- minimal-prose-disciplineSkill
- modelsSkill
- omc-doctorSkill
- omc-setupSkill
- personal-modeSkill
- omc-planSkill
- principlesSkill
- project-session-managerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 49
Validate: run the project's checks (build/test/lint at minimum) on the resolved tree.
- Distinctive: line 52
If intent analysis, resolution, or validation cannot complete after a merge starts, run git merge --abort.
- Distinctive: line 67
Never resolve by "take ours/theirs" wholesale.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Fix Merge Conflicts
A conflict is two intents meeting in one file. Resolution that flattens either intent is a bug with a clean git status.
Workflow
- Establish ownership: you resolve conflicts on a branch you own, against a base others own. Conflicts on a shared branch get reported to the owner, not resolved unilaterally.
- Start the approved integration first: fetch the remote base
(
git fetch origin <base>) and merge the fetched SHA —git merge FETCH_HEAD(or the project's rebase convention, when the caller has not constrained it) — so the conflicts you inspect match what GitHub reported; a local base ref can be absent or behindorigin/<base>, andgit mergenever refreshes it implicitly. Amergeable: conflictinganswer from the remote, or a clean local branch, has noMERGE_HEAD—git log --mergebefore integrating exits 128. - Read both intents:
git log --merge -p -- <file>for each conflicted file once the merge is in progress — what did each side change and why (commit messages are evidence). Conflict markers show the what; the commits show the why. On the rebase path there is noMERGE_HEAD—git log --mergereads nothing there; read the topic side withgit show REBASE_HEAD -- <file>(the dotted rangeREBASE_HEAD..HEADexcludes the topic commit itself, so it shows only the base side) and the base side withgit log -p HEAD -- <file>until the rebase continues. When the caller forbids starting an integration at all (e.g. read-only inspection), compare explicit ranges instead:git log -p <base>...HEAD -- <file>. - Resolve: the default is both-intent-preserving — base side's change and branch side's change both survive, composed. When the intents are genuinely incompatible, the base (upstream) intent wins on shared surfaces and the branch adapts, and the override is reported with its reason.
- Validate: run the project's checks (build/test/lint at minimum) on
the resolved tree. A resolution that compiles but breaks a test took the
wrong side somewhere.
If intent analysis, resolution, or validation cannot complete after a
merge starts, run
git merge --abort; after a rebase starts, rungit rebase --abort. If abort is unsafe or unavailable, stop and hand off the repository with the activeMERGE_HEAD/REBASE_HEADand conflict list explicitly reported. - Finalize: for a rebase, stage each resolved file and run
git rebase --continuerepeatedly untilgit statusshows no active rebase. Validate that final tree before pushing. Then commit the resolution with a message naming what each side wanted. No force-push to shared branches, ever; a rebased own-branch uses--force-with-lease— unless a caller (e.g.babysit) forbids rebase and force-push entirely, in which case merge-commit resolution is the only path.
Rules
- Never resolve by "take ours/theirs" wholesale; that is choosing a winner, not resolving.
- Generated files (lockfiles, snapshots) regenerate rather than hand-merge.
- The resolution commit's message states the two intents it composed —
the next archaeologist (
why) will need it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

