figure-it-out
Skill41k starsChanged 4 days agoMITView on GitHub
Design a rigorous bespoke playbook for a task no bundled skill fits — steps that each end in a check, verification commands, failure branches — stored where the checker validates and anchor-validated. For recurring unusual task shapes.
55 other projects use a version of this.
Trending
Quiet since January.thin dataabout the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecodeword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- endqwerty/endstacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tristanphvn/keeltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- hidenobunagai/astacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- orbyn-dev/orbyn-fullstack-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- requie/endostacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Who's talking about Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus
- A Hacker News story“Sisyphus Now Lives in Oh My Claude”Hacker News · Jan 11, 2026 · 52 points
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode“Silent update security issue”GitHub · Jan 10, 2026 · 1 reactions
- anthropics/claude-plugins-official“feat: Add oh-my-claude-sisyphus multi-agent orchestration plugin”GitHub · Jan 12, 2026
The biggest 3 of 3 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
Used with
Projects with it also use principle-explain-the-number, make-bot-ui and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ianclearySkillprinciple-explain-the-number
Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.
Also in 29 projects that use this
eryzerzSkillmake-bot-ui
Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.
Also in 20 projects that use this
bnemaSkillsetup-pstack
Configure which Pi models pstack uses per role. Detects available provider/model specs and writes pstack's user configuration. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", or changing pstack model choices.
Also in 25 projects that use this
ianclearySkillpoteto-help
Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.
Also in 14 projects that use this
JoshueOsunaSkillPoteto Mode
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work. Use for poteto, /poteto-mode, or requests to work in this style.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions55 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 54
- backnotprop/pstack★ 3.8ksame name
- jtaroreh/agystack★ 128same name
- uzairansaruzi/p3-stack★ 126same name
- dsebban/skills★ 71same name
- nmamano/isomux★ 43same name
- overextended/skills★ 22same name
- TheOnlyFusionCube/potetos-for-everyone★ 21same name
- creedants/pstack-t3★ 18same name
- painhardcore/pstack★ 18same name
- Scino/fstack★ 18same name
44 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository90 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- src/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- docs/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- commandsSkill
- agent-doc-disciplineSkill
- ai-slop-cleanerSkill
- architectSkill
- architecture-surveySkill
- arenaSkill
- ask-navigatorSkill
- askSkill
- autopilotSkill
- autoresearchSkill
- babysitSkill
- benchmark-checklistSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- broSkill
- cancelSkill
- configure-notificationsSkill
- correctSkill
- create-formal-verification-skillSkill
- create-verification-skillSkill
- debugSkill
- deepinitSkill
- deep-interviewSkill
- diagramSkill
- drydockSkill
- executeSkill
- external-contextSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- fix-merge-conflictsSkill
- get-pr-commentsSkill
- graphSkill
- harborSkill
- hillclimbSkill
- howSkill
- hudSkill
- intentSkill
- interrogateSkill
- in-your-own-wordsSkill
- ketchupSkill
- ketchup-videoSkill
- launchSkill
- loftSkill
- maintain-formal-verification-skillSkill
- maintain-verification-skillSkill
- mapSkill
- minimal-code-disciplineSkill
- minimal-prose-disciplineSkill
- modelsSkill
- omc-doctorSkill
- omc-setupSkill
- personal-modeSkill
- omc-planSkill
- principlesSkill
- project-session-managerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 54 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
No bundled skill fits every task.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 54 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Figure It Out
No bundled skill fits every task. This skill designs the playbook that does fit — once, rigorously — and leaves it behind as a validated, rerunnable artifact.
When to use
- a task shape recurs and no bundled skill covers it (release cut from an unusual monorepo, a compliance sweep, a data backfill dance)
- a one-off that is high-stakes enough to deserve a designed procedure rather than improvisation
When not to use
- a bundled skill already fits — check
mapfirst - work one agent finishes inside one session — just do it via
execute
Design workflow
- Objective: one sentence, executable by a stranger with no chat access. Name the deliverable and the done-check.
- Steps: decompose until each step ends in a check a command can verify. A step whose exit cannot be checked is two steps, or a guess.
- Verification: for each step, the exact command and the expected observable. For the whole playbook, the final evidence that says done.
- Failure handling: for each step, what to do when its check fails — retry, rollback, or stop-and-report. Improvisation under failure is where playbooks die; write the branch.
- Dry-run the playbook once end to end on the real task, fixing the playbook where reality disagreed, not the other way around.
Storage and validation
Resolve the checker and the playbooks directory it validates first — from a
target project the script does not exist at ./scripts/, ordinary launches
may leave both plugin-root variables unset, and OMC_STATE_DIR or a parent
.omc-workspace can redirect OMC state away from the checkout's literal
.omc/:
checker="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${OMC_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}}/scripts/check-omc-playbooks.mjs"
if [ ! -f "$checker" ] && omc_bin="$(command -v omc 2>/dev/null)"; then
# Portable realpath: BSD readlink has no -f, so resolve through cd/pwd -P.
bin_dir="$(dirname "$omc_bin")"
bin_dir="$(cd "$bin_dir" && pwd -P)"
for d in "$bin_dir" "$bin_dir/.." "$bin_dir/../.." "$bin_dir/../../.."; do
if [ -f "$d/scripts/check-omc-playbooks.mjs" ]; then checker="$d/scripts/check-omc-playbooks.mjs"; break; fi
done
fi
playbooks_dir="$(node "$checker" "$PWD" --print-playbooks-dir)"Standalone installs reach the script by walking up from the omc binary to
the package root that ships scripts/. If the checker still cannot be
found, report the resolution failure instead of skipping validation.
Store the result at $playbooks_dir/<name>.md with frontmatter:
---
extends: <bundled-skill-name>
when: <one sentence naming the requests this playbook serves>
---Anchor every modification of a bundled step with **After** "<quoted step
text>" / **Before** / **Replace** / **In**, quoting the bundled skill
verbatim. Then run node "$checker" . to validate.
It fails when an OMC upgrade rewrites a step you anchored to. Report what it prints; never guess where an unanchored change belongs.
Rules
- A step without a check does not ship.
- The playbook states its own scope ceiling: what tasks it must NOT be used for.
- Dry-run evidence is recorded in the verification ledger at OMC's state
root (
state/verification-ledger.tsvunder the resolved state root) before the playbook is declared done.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

