agentleFS
ArchitektApxArchitektApx/cursor-skills-for-claude/skills/fix-merge-conflicts/SKILL.md

fix-merge-conflicts

Skill0 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

Resolve merge conflicts non-interactively, validate build and tests, and finalize conflict resolution

12 other projects use a version of this, 4 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Prefer preserving both sides when safe.

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Run compile, lint, and relevant tests.

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep changes minimal and readable.

    line 23
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not leave conflict markers in any file.

    line 24
  5. Distinctive:

    Avoid broad refactors while resolving conflicts.

    line 25
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not push or tag during conflict resolution.

    line 26

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Fix merge conflicts

Trigger

Branch has unresolved merge conflicts and needs a reliable path to a buildable state.

Workflow

  1. Detect all conflicting files from git status and conflict markers.
  2. Resolve each conflict with minimal, correctness-first edits.
  3. Prefer preserving both sides when safe. Otherwise, choose the variant that compiles and keeps public behavior stable.
  4. Regenerate lockfiles with package manager tools instead of hand-editing.
  5. Run compile, lint, and relevant tests.
  6. Stage resolved files and summarize key decisions.

Guardrails

  • Keep changes minimal and readable.
  • Do not leave conflict markers in any file.
  • Avoid broad refactors while resolving conflicts.
  • Do not push or tag during conflict resolution.

Output

  • Files resolved
  • Notable resolution choices
  • Build/test outcome

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.