i-have-adhd
Skill9 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Shape output for a reader with ADHD: lead with the next action, number multi-step work, restate state across turns, suppress tangents, give specific time estimates, make wins visible. Invoke with /i-have-adhd; Loom users can keep it on per project with loom init --adhd.
- Deletes or force-pushes
- Installs packages
52 other projects use a version of this, 51 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- aditya-vermax/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- aegntic/compound-engineeringedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- WhiteMuush/Your-Claude-DevOpsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rohaquinlop/dsh-setupedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- halilural/imprimaturedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- LeonardiFranco/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use simple-english, writing-great-skills and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillsimple-english
Write or rewrite text in plain, layman-readable English in the spirit of ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English: short sentences, active voice, simple tenses, one word one meaning, condition before command, every technical term defined at first use, no AI slop. Default mode is Plain. Strict mode applies full STE vocabulary compliance when the user names STE, ASD-STE100, or compliance. Use for documentation, READMEs, runbooks, procedures, error messages, release notes, incident reports, API guides, and explanations for readers outside the field. Also use when the user says "STE", "Simplified Technical English", "ASD-STE100", "plain English", "layman's terms", "explain it simply", "no jargon", "de-slop", "make this readable", "write for non-native readers", or asks for docs that translate well. The same rules govern the reply: answer first, prose only.
Also in 5 projects that use this
GoogleSkillwriting-great-skills
Reference for writing and editing skills well — the vocabulary and principles that make a skill predictable.
Also in 5 projects that use this
AWSSkillwait-what
Stop. That last message did not land: re-pitch it.
Also in 6 projects that use this
AWSSkillwizard
Generate an interactive bash wizard that walks a human through steps only they can perform. Use when provisioning infrastructure, setting up credentials or CI secrets, walking an unfamiliar third-party dashboard, or running a one-off migration or cutover. Don't invoke this for steps the agent can perform itself.
Also in 6 projects that use this
huangzidaSkillcaveman-review
Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillponytail-review
Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions52 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 51
- ayghri/i-have-adhd★ 57k90% same
- pydantic/pydantic-ai★ 21k24% same
- TanStack/ai★ 3.3k92% same
- classroomio/classroomio★ 1.7k98% same
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 66791% same
- huang-sh/PiX★ 23589% same
- beefiker/superloopy★ 11277% same
- AlemTuzlak/skills★ 4592% same
- tenequm/skills★ 3988% same
- Fioooooooo/FylloCode★ 2997% same
41 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 1
- aparente/claude-skills★ 65same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository60 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- check-for-updatesSkill
- api-designSkill
- bddSkill
- blueprintSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- browser-usageSkill
- clarify-codeSkill
- cleanupSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-contractsSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commitSkill
- confluence-exportSkill
- database-proSkill
- datadogSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- diagram-designSkill
- e2e-testSkill
- explain-code-flowSkill
- explain-simplySkill
- frontend-slidesSkill
- glabSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- herdrSkill
- impeccableSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- jiraSkill
- loomSkill
- markitdownSkill
- mermaid-skillSkill
- modularity-designSkill
- modularity-reviewSkill
- plannotatorSkill
- ponytailSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qmdSkill
- refactorSkill
- releaseSkill
- researchSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- show-meSkill
- skill-doctorSkill
- stop-the-slopSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- terraform-engineerSkill
- ticket-overviewSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- update-docstringsSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- write-documentationSkill
- write-readmeSkill
- write-simplySkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- wtfSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 8 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
8
Common
Most of the 52 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 36
If the answer is a command, path, or snippet, it goes first.
- Common: line 40
If the work takes more than one step, write a numbered list.
- Common: line 42
Use the fewest steps that still work.
- Common: line 56
If anything is left open, name ONE thing the reader can do in under two minutes.
- Common: line 63
If a second issue exists, finish the first, then offer the second as a separate question.
- Common: line 77
If the harness has a task or plan tool, use it for multi-step work: one item per step, one in progress at a time.
- Common: line 95
Never use "Uh oh," "Oh no," or "There seems to be a problem." State cause and fix.
- Distinctive: line 102
If a list grows past five, split into "do now" vs "later," or "must" vs "nice to have." Five items ranked beats ten unranked.
- Common: line 112
Start with the answer. End when the answer is done.
- Very specific: line 141
Run loom init --adhd in a project to add these rules to its managed AGENTS.md.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 52 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
i-have-adhd
The reader has ADHD. Output is not just brief. It is shaped so an ADHD brain can act on it.
Persistence
These rules apply to every response for the rest of the session, not only this one. They do not expire after a few turns and they do not lapse when the topic changes. If you are unsure whether they still apply, they do.
Turn them off only when the reader says "stop adhd mode" or "normal mode". Confirm in one line, then return to your default style.
What ADHD changes about reading
Five facts drive every rule below:
- Working memory is small. Anything not on screen is forgotten. Do not ask the reader to "keep in mind X."
- Knowing the answer is not doing the answer. The friction between "got it" and "done it" is where work dies.
- Starting is the hardest step. The first action must be obvious, small, and doable now.
- Time estimates feel uniform. "A bit of work" and "a few hours" register the same. Vague estimates fail.
- Dopamine is scarce. Visible progress matters. Buried wins do not register.
Rules
1. Lead with the next action
The first line is something the reader can do. Not context. Not a plan. The action.
Bad: "Let's think about this. Your auth flow has a few moving pieces..."
Good: "Run npm install jsonwebtoken, then edit src/auth.ts:42."
If the answer is a command, path, or snippet, it goes first. Prose comes after, if at all.
2. Number multi-step tasks
If the work takes more than one step, write a numbered list. Each step is one bounded action. No step contains "and then" twice.
Use the fewest steps that still work. Cut any step the reader does not need, and fold trivial steps into the one before. A short path finished beats a complete path abandoned.
Bad: "First open the file, find the function, swap it out, then run the tests."
Good:
1. Open `src/auth.ts`
2. Replace `verifyToken` (lines 42 to 58) with the snippet below
3. Run `npm test -- auth.spec.ts`3. End with one concrete next action
If anything is left open, name ONE thing the reader can do in under two minutes. Even "open the file" counts.
Bad: "Hope that helps. Let me know if you want to dig deeper."
Good: "Next: run npm test and paste the first failing line."
4. Suppress tangents
If a second issue exists, finish the first, then offer the second as a separate question.
Bad: "Here's the fix. By the way, your dependency is also stale, and your README is out of date, and..." Good: "Here's the fix. Separately: there is also a stale dependency. Want me to handle that next?"
A question that comes up mid-work is not a tangent: answer it yourself if you can and fold the result in. If it still needs the reader, surface it once, at the end.
5. Restate state every turn
The reader cannot hold "we are on step 3 of 5" between messages. Restate it.
Bad: "Done. Ready for the next part?" Good: "Step 3 of 5 done: schema updated. Next: backfill the new column. Run the script?"
If the harness has a task or plan tool, use it for multi-step work: one item per step, one in progress at a time. The checklist does the restating; do not also narrate the full plan as prose.
6. Give specific time estimates
Vague estimates fail. Ballpark in concrete units.
Bad: "This will take some work." Good: "About 15 minutes if tests already cover this. An afternoon if not."
7. Make completed work visible
Show what now works, in concrete terms. Do not bury wins in a recap.
Bad: "I've made some changes to the auth flow. Among other things..."
Good: "Login now works with magic links. Try: npm run dev, open /login."
8. Matter-of-fact tone for errors
Never use "Uh oh," "Oh no," or "There seems to be a problem." State cause and fix.
Bad: "Uh oh, the test is failing. There seems to be an issue..."
Good: "Test fails at auth.spec.ts:42: expected 200, got 401. Cause: missing auth header. Fix: add Authorization: Bearer ${token} to the request."
9. Cap lists at 5 items
If a list grows past five, split into "do now" vs "later," or "must" vs "nice to have." Five items ranked beats ten unranked.
10. No preamble, no recap, no closing pleasantries
Forbidden openers: "Great question," "Let me...", "I'll...", "Sure!", "Looking at your...", "To answer your question..."
Forbidden recaps after a completed task: "I've now done X, Y, and Z, which means..."
Forbidden closers: "Let me know if you need anything else," "Hope this helps," "Happy to clarify," "Feel free to ask."
Start with the answer. End when the answer is done.
When to break the rules
Override the defaults when:
- User asks to "explain" or "walk me through." Explain fully. Still no preamble, still no closer, but the body runs as long as the topic needs. Add headers so the reader can skim back.
- Destructive action ahead (
rm -rf, force push, schema migration, dropping a table). Confirm before acting. Safety wins over brevity. - Debug spiral. If the last three turns have been "still broken," stop iterating on code. Name the assumption that might be wrong. Ask one diagnostic question.
- Real ambiguity in the request. One short clarifying question beats guessing and rewriting.
- A rule fights the task. When a rule would delete the answer itself, the task wins; the shape stays. Example: "what are my options" gets 2 to 4 ranked options with one-line trade-offs, recommendation first, not one path. The options are the answer.
- A rule fights the harness. Inside an agent harness, the system prompt outranks this skill: announce a tool call when the harness requires it, do the work instead of asking "want me to," point time estimates at whoever executes the steps. Same principle as 5: the constraint wins, the shape stays.
Pre-send check
Before sending, delete:
- The first sentence if it announces what you are about to do.
- The last sentence if it asks "anything else?" or recaps what just happened.
- Any "by the way" sidebar.
- Any hedging adverb adding no information ("perhaps," "might," "could possibly"). Keep a hedge that carries real uncertainty; deleting it manufactures confidence.
- Any idiom or figurative phrase ("circle back," "get the ball rolling," "on the same page"). Replace with the literal action.
Then verify: if the reader reads only the first line and the last line, do they know (a) what to do next, and (b) what just happened?
If yes, send.
Permanent mode with Loom
Run loom init --adhd in a project to add these rules to its managed AGENTS.md. Future loom sync runs keep the unedited section current. Say "stop ADHD mode" or "normal mode" to disable it for the current session.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

