write-readme
Skill9 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when writing or improving README files. Not all READMEs are the same — provides templates and guidance matched to your audience and project type.
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- protokol11/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tada5hi/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- danielcherubini/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- kitloomlk-stack/writing-docs-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- TitusKirch/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- devantler-tech/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- remix-run/remix★ 33ksame name
- huangwb8/skills★ 50same name
- danielcherubini/skills★ 14same name
- wolf5996/agentic-skills★ 10same name
- devantler-tech/agent-skills★ 3same name
- Gidntsquia/claude-config★ 2same name
- tada5hi/skills★ 2same name
- TitusKirch/skills★ 2same name
- protokol11/skills★ 1same name
- turntuptechnologies-ai/skills★ 1same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository60 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- check-for-updatesSkill
- api-designSkill
- bddSkill
- blueprintSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- browser-usageSkill
- clarify-codeSkill
- cleanupSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-contractsSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commitSkill
- confluence-exportSkill
- database-proSkill
- datadogSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- diagram-designSkill
- e2e-testSkill
- explain-code-flowSkill
- explain-simplySkill
- frontend-slidesSkill
- glabSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- herdrSkill
- i-have-adhdSkill
- impeccableSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- jiraSkill
- loomSkill
- markitdownSkill
- mermaid-skillSkill
- modularity-designSkill
- modularity-reviewSkill
- plannotatorSkill
- ponytailSkill
- prototypeSkill
- qmdSkill
- refactorSkill
- releaseSkill
- researchSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- show-meSkill
- skill-doctorSkill
- stop-the-slopSkill
- tddSkill
- teachSkill
- terraform-engineerSkill
- ticket-overviewSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- update-docstringsSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- write-documentationSkill
- write-simplySkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- wtfSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 45
Read current README, identify stale sections
- Very specific: line 51
Check against actual project state (package.json, main files, etc.)
- Distinctive: line 53
Update "Last reviewed" date if present
- Distinctive: line 57
After drafting, ask: "Anything else to highlight or include that I might have missed?"
- Distinctive: line 68
Ask the user: if unclear. Don't assume OSS defaults for everything.
- Distinctive: line 72
Every README needs at minimum:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Crafting Effective READMEs
Overview
READMEs answer questions your audience will have. Different audiences need different information - a contributor to an OSS project needs different context than future-you opening a config folder.
Always ask: Who will read this, and what do they need to know?
Process
Step 1: Identify the Task
Ask: "What README task are you working on?"
| Task | When |
| Creating | New project, no README yet |
| Adding | Need to document something new |
| Updating | Capabilities changed, content is stale |
| Reviewing | Checking if README is still accurate |
Step 2: Task-Specific Questions
Creating initial README:
- What type of project? (see Project Types below)
- What problem does this solve in one sentence?
- What's the quickest path to "it works"?
- Anything notable to highlight?
Adding a section:
- What needs documenting?
- Where should it go in the existing structure?
- Who needs this info most?
Updating existing content:
- What changed?
- Read current README, identify stale sections
- Propose specific edits
Reviewing/refreshing:
- Read current README
- Check against actual project state (package.json, main files, etc.)
- Flag outdated sections
- Update "Last reviewed" date if present
Step 3: Always Ask
After drafting, ask: "Anything else to highlight or include that I might have missed?"
Project Types
| Type | Audience | Key Sections | Template |
| Open Source | Contributors, users worldwide | Install, Usage, Contributing, License | templates/oss.md |
| Personal | Future you, portfolio viewers | What it does, Tech stack, Learnings | templates/personal.md |
| Internal | Teammates, new hires | Setup, Architecture, Runbooks | templates/internal.md |
| Config | Future you (confused) | What's here, Why, How to extend, Gotchas | templates/xdg-config.md |
Ask the user if unclear. Don't assume OSS defaults for everything.
Essential Sections (All Types)
Every README needs at minimum:
- Name - Self-explanatory title
- Description - What + why in 1-2 sentences
- Usage - How to use it (examples help)
References
section-checklist.md- Which sections to include by project typestyle-guide.md- Common README mistakes and prose guidanceusing-references.md- Guide to deeper reference materials
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

