agentleFS
VulnetixVulnetix/pix-ai-coding-assistant/skills/iac-scan/SKILL.md

iac-scan

Skill9 starsChanged 6 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Terraform / OpenTofu / Nix / k8s manifest misconfiguration detection — open security groups, missing encryption, public S3/GCS, IAM wildcards, plaintext secrets, missing tags. Use when reviewing an IaC PR, gating `terraform apply` / `tofu apply`, auditing existing state for drift, or building a compliance report for cloud configuration.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read .vulnetix/capabilities.yaml.

    line 36
  2. Very specific:

    If binaries.terraform: true (or tofu), suggest:

    line 54
  3. Very specific:

    Don't run terraform apply from the skill.

    line 60

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Vulnetix IaC Scan Skill

Use when

  • Pre-apply: scan *.tf / *.tofu for misconfigurations.
  • PR review: catch open security groups, plaintext secrets, IAM wildcards.
  • Audit existing infra against compliance baselines (CIS, NIST).
  • Detect drift between repo IaC and deployed state.
  • Pre-merge: gate on critical findings (e.g. publicly-readable S3).

Don't use for

  • Source-code SAST — use sast-scan.
  • Dockerfile / container analysis — use container-scan.
  • Cloud runtime monitoring — Pix is static-only; use a CSPM for runtime.

Conventions

Follows skills/_lib/contract.md. In short: use the vulnetix_* MCP tools when the agent has them and the CLI otherwise — both shape their own output, so there is no jq step any more. Independent calls go out as concurrent Bash tool calls in one message. One trailing suggestion, not a playbook. See the contract for surface selection, output style and memory writes.

Step 1: Load capabilities

Read .vulnetix/capabilities.yaml. Confirm derived.has_iac: true or --paths provided. Otherwise abort.

Step 2: Run scan

vulnetix iac --paths "$PATHS" -o json > .vulnetix/iac.${TIMESTAMP}.json

Captures: open security groups, missing encryption, public S3/GCS, IAM wildcards, unpinned providers, secrets in plaintext, missing tags, unencrypted state backends.

Step 3: Render

| Severity | File:Line | Resource | Issue | Recommendation |

Group by file. For each high-severity issue, include a 2-3 line code example of the fix.

Step 4: Risk overlay

If binaries.terraform: true (or tofu), suggest:

terraform plan -no-color | head -200    # for context on what would change

Don't run terraform apply from the skill.

Memory update

.vulnetix/iac/<timestamp>.summary.yaml with finding counts.

Edge cases & gotchas

  • Requires derived.has_iac: true OR explicit --paths. CWD without *.tf files = empty result.
  • Detection is static — it cannot evaluate runtime variable interpolation. var.environment == "prod" conditional logic is reported as both branches.
  • terraform plan integration is suggestive only — the skill does NOT run terraform plan automatically (state access concerns).
  • Provider-specific rules (AWS / GCP / Azure) are detected via resource type prefixes; modules wrapping resources may obscure the type.
  • Pre-existing infra not present in IaC (terraform import candidates) is not detected.
  • k8s manifest support is limited to top-level YAML in *.yaml files with kind: matching common workload types.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.