dep-resolve
Skill9 starsChanged 6 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Dependency-conflict resolution when a `fix` version bump fails — diagnose the peer-dep tree, find a compatible safe version set, propose package-manager overrides (`overrides`/`resolutions`/`replace`/`[patch]`), fall back to safe-harbour inline patching. Use when an upgrade is blocked by transitive constraints, a peer-dep conflict surfaces, or you need to override a vulnerable transitive without bumping the parent.
In this repository18 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- container-scanSkill
- dashboardSkill
- dependency-choiceSkill
- detection-rulesSkill
- eol-checkSkill
- exploit-testSkill
- fixSkill
- iac-scanSkill
- license-checkSkill
- repo-impactSkill
- sast-scanSkill
- sbom-generateSkill
- secret-scanSkill
- secure-code-writeSkill
- typosquat-checkSkill
- verify-fixSkill
- vex-publishSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 34
When fix proposes a version bump but the lockfile resolution fails (peer-dep conflict, transitive constraint, etc.), use this skill to find …
- Very specific: line 38
Read .vulnetix/capabilities.yaml (derived.primary_package_manager decides which lockfile to read) and .vulnetix/memory.yaml (decisions / …
- Distinctive: line 81
Always pause for user approval before writing manifest edits.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Vulnetix Dependency Resolution Skill
Use when
fixproposed a version bump but<pm> installerrored on peer-dep conflict.- A transitive vulnerable dep needs pinning without bumping the direct dependency.
- Lockfile resolution fails after a merge — diagnose which deps disagree.
- Considering a package-manager override (
npm overrides,pnpm overrides,yarn resolutions). - Last-resort: copy patched upstream code inline as first-party (Type A0 inline).
Don't use for
- Initial fix proposal — use
fixfirst. - Just looking up safe versions — use
dependency-choice. - Multi-CVE upgrade orchestration — use
@dep-upgrade-orchestrator.
Conventions
Follows skills/_lib/contract.md. In short: use the vulnetix_* MCP tools when the agent has them and the CLI otherwise — both shape their own output, so there is no jq step any more. Independent calls go out as concurrent Bash tool calls in one message. One trailing suggestion, not a playbook. See the contract for surface selection, output style and memory writes.
When fix proposes a version bump but the lockfile resolution fails (peer-dep conflict, transitive constraint, etc.), use this skill to find a compatible set.
Step 1: Load capabilities + memory
Read .vulnetix/capabilities.yaml (derived.primary_package_manager decides which lockfile to read) and .vulnetix/memory.yaml (decisions / safe-harbour notes).
Step 2: Map the conflict
# npm/pnpm/yarn
npm ls "$PACKAGE" 2>&1 || pnpm why "$PACKAGE" || yarn why "$PACKAGE"
# pip
pip show "$PACKAGE"
# go
go mod why "$PACKAGE"
# cargo
cargo tree -i "$PACKAGE"Pick the command for the detected package manager. Capture the dep tree paths.
Step 3: Pull safe-version graph
vulnetix vdb versions "$PACKAGE" -o json
vulnetix vdb fixes "$PACKAGE" -o jsonFor each candidate target version:
- Cross-check transitive constraints from Step 2
- Cross-check known vulns at that version (
vdb vulns)
Step 4: Propose resolution
Prefer (in order):
- Single bump — the version Safe Harbour picks under the repository's strategy (
safeHarbourStrategyin.vulnetix/agent.yaml) that fixes the vuln and satisfies constraints; it may not be the newest release - Override — package-manager override (npm
overrides, pnpmpnpm.overrides, yarnresolutions) - Safe-harbour inline — copy upstream patch into repo as first-party code (link to
fixType A0 path) - Workaround only —
detection-rules <vuln-id>while waiting for upstream
Step 5: Apply (with confirmation)
For option 1: edit the manifest, run <pm> install (npm/pnpm/yarn/pip/go/cargo).
For option 2: write the override block, run install.
For option 3: hand off to fix Type A0.
For option 4: hand off to detection-rules.
Always pause for user approval before writing manifest edits.
Step 6: Verify
Suggest verify-fix <vuln-id> after the resolution lands.
Memory update
event: dep-resolve with the chosen path.
Edge cases & gotchas
- Dep-tree diagnosis uses package-manager-specific commands:
npm ls,pnpm why,yarn why,pip show,go mod why,cargo tree -i. Wrong PM = misleading output. - Override semantics differ per ecosystem: npm
overridesis post-install hoist, pnpmpnpm.overridesis install-time pinning, yarnresolutionsworks with both classic and Berry but with different scoping. - Pip has no clean override — pinning the transitive in requirements.txt +
--no-depsfor the parent is the cleanest workaround. - Go
replacedirectives work only when the module path is identical (no rename through fork). - Cargo
[patch]requires the patched crate at a real path or git ref; cannot inline a hex string. - Inline-as-first-party (Type A0) introduces license obligations from the upstream package — copy the LICENSE file too.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

