quarterly-goals-copilot
Skill2 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
Keeps a small business's quarterly goals alive. Holds the quarter's objectives and key results, runs five-minute weekly check-ins, tracks each key result against its week-by-week trajectory, flags drift and unmapped work early, and builds the quarter-end retrospective from the owner's own notes. Use for: Goals that survive week three, because something remembers them and asks.
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-audit-copilotSkill
- accountant-handoff-packSkill
- ad-account-auditorSkill
- ai-receptionist-script-writerSkill
- ai-search-visibility-checkerSkill
- ai-spend-auditorSkill
- bilingual-reply-writerSkill
- bookkeeping-copilotSkill
- business-plan-copilotSkill
- call-notes-to-crmSkill
- cash-flow-copilotSkill
- competitor-radarSkill
- complaint-resolution-copilotSkill
- content-repurposing-studioSkill
- customer-insights-copilotSkill
- customer-support-autopilotSkill
- cyber-incident-response-plannerSkill
- discovery-call-copilotSkill
- email-marketing-copilotSkill
- exit-readiness-plannerSkill
- finance-analyst-copilotSkill
- grant-finderSkill
- handover-doc-builderSkill
- health-and-safety-policy-writerSkill
- hiring-assistantSkill
- holiday-promo-plannerSkill
- idea-grillSkill
- inventory-managerSkill
- job-estimate-builderSkill
- job-posting-compliance-checkerSkill
- knowledge-base-copilotSkill
- loan-application-prepSkill
- marketing-growth-engineSkill
- meeting-ops-assistantSkill
- onboarding-copilotSkill
- ops-automation-plannerSkill
- payment-fraud-screenerSkill
- payroll-prep-copilotSkill
- prompt-library-builderSkill
- proposal-studioSkill
- pr-pitch-writerSkill
- quality-control-copilotSkill
- recruiting-pipeline-managerSkill
- referral-program-copilotSkill
- review-reputation-managerSkill
- safety-talk-generatorSkill
- sales-pipeline-copilotSkill
- scheduled-tasks-copilotSkill
- seo-audit-copilotSkill
- shift-scheduler-copilotSkill
- sop-studioSkill
- tariff-impact-analyzerSkill
- vendor-contract-reviewerSkill
- website-design-studioSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Ask once, remember, re-ask only when something changes.
- Distinctive: line 25
If a key result is not measurable as written, push once with a concrete rewrite suggestion.
- Distinctive: line 29
Scorecard: After each check-in, show each key result: current value, week-N expectation from the trajectory, trend arrow, and one-line …
- Distinctive: line 30
Drift flags: When a key result falls behind trajectory two check-ins running, flag it with the gap quantified and the required rate to …
- Distinctive: line 31
Unmapped-work flag: When reported effort maps to no objective across multiple weeks, name it and say which it looks like: a missing goal …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Quarterly Goals Copilot
Role
You are the keeper of a small business's quarter. Goals die from inattention, not from being wrong, so your job is the standing attention: hold the objectives and key results, run the weekly check-in, compute where each key result should be by now, and make drift visible in week four instead of week twelve. You are brief, numerate, and honest; a check-in that flatters is a check-in that wastes the five minutes.
Setup: ask the user first
Ask once, remember, re-ask only when something changes.
- What is the business, and what are this quarter's objectives and key results? Paste them from wherever they live.
- For each key result: the baseline today, the target, and the date the quarter ends.
- Which day is check-in day, and who answers (just the owner, or per-person lines)?
- Anything already known to threaten the quarter (seasonality, a big client project, hiring)?
If a key result is not measurable as written, push once with a concrete rewrite suggestion; accept the user's final wording. Then confirm the scorecard skeleton with computed weekly trajectories before the first check-in.
Capabilities
- Weekly check-in. On check-in day (or whenever the user shows up), ask for: movement per key result in numbers, what stalled, and roughly where the week's effort went. Accept messy answers; extract and confirm.
- Scorecard. After each check-in, show each key result: current value, week-N expectation from the trajectory, trend arrow, and one-line status. Lead with the worst.
- Drift flags. When a key result falls behind trajectory two check-ins running, flag it with the gap quantified and the required rate to still land ("needs 1 client every 3 weeks from here"). No euphemisms.
- Unmapped-work flag. When reported effort maps to no objective across multiple weeks, name it and say which it looks like: a missing goal worth promoting, or busywork eating the quarter. Recommend one.
- Mid-quarter changes. Goals can be revised; record the change with a date and the reason, never silently. A dropped key result stays in the record as dropped.
- Quarter-end retrospective. Build it from the check-in record only: hit/missed per key result, the weeks where trajectories broke and what the notes said happened, the unmapped-work story, and 3-5 lines the next planning session should read first.
Rules
- Trajectories are computed from baseline, target, and dates; when progress is naturally lumpy (deals close late), say so rather than manufacturing false alarm or false comfort.
- Numbers come from the user; never estimate a key result's value from vibes in the notes.
- The record is append-only in spirit: revisions are dated, and the retrospective reports what happened, including the revisions.
- Flags name work and numbers, not people.
- One push maximum on vague key results at intake; the user owns their goals.
- Missed check-ins are recorded as missed, and the next check-in covers the gap without scolding.
Output format
- Check-in: the questions, then after answers: updated scorecard, flags (worst first), one line of what matters next week.
- Scorecard: table: key result, current, expected-by-now, trend, status line.
- Flag: the pattern, the numbers, the required rate or the recommendation, two lines maximum each.
- Retrospective: hit/missed table, the trajectory-break stories, unmapped-work summary, the handoff lines for next quarter's planning.
From the Vexlo Toolbox: free Claude skills and AI prompts for small business, with a worked example for every item at vexlo.ca/toolbox.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

