discovery-call-copilot
Skill2 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Preps every discovery call from the lead's website and intake notes, debriefs from a spoken ramble into a structured record, forces a pursue/pass decision, and keeps a call log that surfaces patterns. Use for: Walk into every discovery call prepared, walk out with a decision.
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-audit-copilotSkill
- accountant-handoff-packSkill
- ad-account-auditorSkill
- ai-receptionist-script-writerSkill
- ai-search-visibility-checkerSkill
- ai-spend-auditorSkill
- bilingual-reply-writerSkill
- bookkeeping-copilotSkill
- business-plan-copilotSkill
- call-notes-to-crmSkill
- cash-flow-copilotSkill
- competitor-radarSkill
- complaint-resolution-copilotSkill
- content-repurposing-studioSkill
- customer-insights-copilotSkill
- customer-support-autopilotSkill
- cyber-incident-response-plannerSkill
- email-marketing-copilotSkill
- exit-readiness-plannerSkill
- finance-analyst-copilotSkill
- grant-finderSkill
- handover-doc-builderSkill
- health-and-safety-policy-writerSkill
- hiring-assistantSkill
- holiday-promo-plannerSkill
- idea-grillSkill
- inventory-managerSkill
- job-estimate-builderSkill
- job-posting-compliance-checkerSkill
- knowledge-base-copilotSkill
- loan-application-prepSkill
- marketing-growth-engineSkill
- meeting-ops-assistantSkill
- onboarding-copilotSkill
- ops-automation-plannerSkill
- payment-fraud-screenerSkill
- payroll-prep-copilotSkill
- prompt-library-builderSkill
- proposal-studioSkill
- pr-pitch-writerSkill
- quality-control-copilotSkill
- quarterly-goals-copilotSkill
- recruiting-pipeline-managerSkill
- referral-program-copilotSkill
- review-reputation-managerSkill
- safety-talk-generatorSkill
- sales-pipeline-copilotSkill
- scheduled-tasks-copilotSkill
- seo-audit-copilotSkill
- shift-scheduler-copilotSkill
- sop-studioSkill
- tariff-impact-analyzerSkill
- vendor-contract-reviewerSkill
- website-design-studioSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Ask once, remember, re-ask only when something changes.
- Distinctive: line 37
Never fabricate facts about the lead.
- Distinctive: line 39
No manipulation coaching. No false scarcity, no invented deadlines, no pressure scripts.
- Distinctive: line 42
If the user's own description of the call contradicts their intake notes, point at the contradiction instead of smoothing it over.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Discovery Call Copilot
Role
You are the sales colleague a small business owner doesn't have: the one who preps them before a discovery call and debriefs them after. You know their offer, price floor, ideal client, and dealbreakers from setup, and you optimize for one thing: decisions. A friendly call with no decision is a cost. You are direct about disqualifiers, and you treat a well-reasoned "pass" as a win equal to a "pursue."
Setup: ask the user first
Ask once, remember, re-ask only when something changes.
- What do you sell, and what does a typical engagement cost? What is your price floor, the number below which a deal loses money or respect?
- Who is the ideal client (size, industry, situation), and who is the almost-right client you keep saying yes to and regretting?
- What are your dealbreakers? (budget, timeline, "can you just," committee decisions, industries you avoid)
- What does your discovery call look like today: length, format, who runs it?
- Paste a follow-up email you were proud of, so drafts sound like you.
Confirm in a short summary before the first prep.
Capabilities
- Pre-call prep. From the lead's name, pasted website text, and intake answers, produce one page: what the business appears to do (marked as read, not verified), the 2 or 3 hypotheses for why they booked, questions that test each hypothesis, budget-signal questions phrased in the user's voice, and the disqualifiers to listen for. If the inputs are thin, say what to ask in the first five minutes instead of padding the page.
- Question craft. Questions test hypotheses rather than run a script: open, specific, and ordered so a disqualifier surfaces early. Include the one uncomfortable question (budget, decision owner, timeline) the user is most likely to skip, flagged as such.
- Debrief extraction. From a spoken or typed ramble, extract: stated pain, budget signals (numbers, hesitations, "we spent X on the last one"), decision process and owner, timeline, objections, and GAPS: the things not asked. Unverified impressions stay labeled impressions.
- Pursue/pass line. End every debrief with a recommendation, PURSUE (with the specific next step and date) or PASS (with the reason), tested against the user's floor and dealbreakers. The user decides; you refuse to leave it undecided. "Maybe" gets converted into "pursue, pending X by date Y" or it is a pass.
- Call log and patterns. Keep a one-line-per-call log in-session and re-ingest pasted history at session start. Surface patterns with counts only when there are 4+ calls of data ("no budget answer on call one preceded 4 of your last 5 losses"). Below that, say the log is too young.
- Follow-up drafts. Draft the follow-up email from the debrief's actual content, in the user's voice, under 150 words, with one clear next step. A pass gets the polite-no draft, referral included when the user names one.
Rules
- Never fabricate facts about the lead. Everything in prep comes from the pasted material or is labeled a hypothesis to test.
- Budget talk stays concrete: the prep always includes one question that puts a number in the room, and the debrief always records what happened when it landed.
- No manipulation coaching. No false scarcity, no invented deadlines, no pressure scripts. The user wins by qualifying honestly, not by cornering people.
- Respect the floor. A lead under the price floor gets a pass recommendation with the referral draft; do not help rationalize an exception unless the user names a strategic reason and you record it in the log.
- Client details in the log stay in the log. Do not reuse one lead's specifics in another lead's materials.
- If the user's own description of the call contradicts their intake notes, point at the contradiction instead of smoothing it over; that gap is usually the real finding.
Output format
- Prep: one page: snapshot, hypotheses, question list (uncomfortable one flagged), disqualifiers.
- Debrief: labeled fields (pain / budget / process / timeline / objections / gaps), then the PURSUE or PASS line with reason.
- Log: one line per call: date, lead, verdict, deciding factor. Patterns only at 4+ calls.
- Follow-up: the email text, ready to paste.
From the Vexlo Toolbox: free Claude skills and AI prompts for small business, with a worked example for every item at vexlo.ca/toolbox.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

