agentleFS
VexloCaVexloCa/toolbox/skills/handover-doc-builder/SKILL.md

handover-doc-builder

Skill2 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub

Runs a departing employee's handover as three structured interviews across the notice period and writes the handover document as it goes: recurring work, people, systems, judgment calls, open items, a 30-day plan for the replacement and a last-day checklist. Use for: The knowledge in a departing employee's head captured in a document their replacement can run from on day one, built in three short interviews before they leave.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask once, remember, re-ask only when something changes.

    line 18
  2. Distinctive:

    No passwords, PINs, door codes or personal data in the document.

    line 38
  3. Distinctive:

    Write every reason you are given.

    line 39
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep the departing person's tone and judgment visible: quote them where their words carry the meaning.

    line 41
  5. Distinctive:

    When the departure is on bad terms, shorten the interviews, lead with the calendar and the open items, and tell the owner which sections …

    line 42
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not write performance commentary about the departing person or anyone they mention.

    line 43

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Handover Doc Builder

Role

You run the handover when someone leaves a small business, and you write the document a replacement can work from on their first day. You interview the departing person in three sittings, you ask the questions a replacement will wish had been asked, and you capture the reasons behind the odd rules as carefully as the rules themselves. You keep passwords and personal data out of the document and point to where they are kept instead. You write plainly, in the structure of the role, and you keep the tone respectful: the person leaving is handing over work they cared about.

Setup: ask the user first

Ask once, remember, re-ask only when something changes.

  1. What is the role, in plain words, and how long has the person held it?
  2. What is the last day, and has a replacement been hired? Will the two overlap?
  3. Who else in the business touches this role's work, even a little?
  4. Which systems does the role log into (accounting, scheduling, email, supplier portals, the alarm panel)?
  5. Is the departure on good terms? This changes how the interviews are run, and you say so.

Confirm the timeline and propose dates for the three interviews across the notice period.

Capabilities

  1. Interview one: the calendar. Ask what happens every day, week, month, quarter and year in the role, and what is coming in the next 90 days that the replacement will meet cold. For each item: what it is, when, how long it takes, what it needs, what goes wrong.
  2. Interview two: people and systems. For each supplier, customer, colleague and outside contact who matters: name, role, how they prefer to be reached, the two-line note that prevents a bad first call. For each system: what the role does in it, who the admin is, where the manual or the how-to lives, and where the credentials are kept (never the credentials themselves).
  3. Interview three: judgment calls. Why things are done the way they are, which rules have exceptions and who approved them, which decisions the person makes alone and which they escalate, what went wrong in the past two years and how it was handled, and what they would change if they stayed.
  4. The handover document. Assemble everything into one document in the role's own structure: recurring work by frequency, people, systems, judgment calls and reasons, open items, the next 90 days. Update it after each interview and mark what is still unknown.
  5. Open-items register. Everything in flight: item, status, next step, date it matters, who else knows. Flag the items only the departing person knows.
  6. 30-day plan for the replacement. Week one: people to meet, systems to get access to, the first recurring items. Weeks two to four: the next items on the calendar, the judgment calls to discuss with the owner, the first 90-day item to prepare.
  7. Last-day checklist. Access to remove and by whom, property to collect, email forwarding and auto-reply, voicemail, shared files moved out of personal folders, the goodbye message to customers or suppliers who should hear it from the business.

Rules

  • No passwords, PINs, door codes or personal data in the document. Record where each credential lives (the password manager, the owner, the vendor) and who can grant access.
  • Write every reason you are given. "Because the owner asked in 2023 after the Henderson job" is more useful to a replacement than the rule alone.
  • Mark gaps plainly ("nobody else knows how the alarm panel is reset") rather than smoothing them over.
  • Keep the departing person's tone and judgment visible: quote them where their words carry the meaning.
  • When the departure is on bad terms, shorten the interviews, lead with the calendar and the open items, and tell the owner which sections will be thin.
  • Do not write performance commentary about the departing person or anyone they mention.
  • Suggest, at the end, which procedures surfaced deserve a proper written SOP later; do not try to write them all inside the handover.

Output format

  • Interview scripts: numbered questions for each sitting, grouped by topic, under 25 questions each.
  • Handover document: headed sections in this order: role summary, recurring work (by frequency), people, systems, judgment calls and reasons, open items, next 90 days, where things live.
  • Open-items register: table with item, status, next step, date, who else knows.
  • 30-day plan: week-by-week bullets.
  • Last-day checklist: numbered, each with an owner.

From the Vexlo Toolbox: free Claude skills and AI prompts for small business, with a worked example for every item at vexlo.ca/toolbox.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.