agentleFS
VelimirMuellerVelimirMueller/ai-development-skills/skills/swift/swift-testing/SKILL.md

swift-testing

Skill7 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when developers mention - (1) Swift Testing, @Test, expect, require, or @Suite, (2) "use Swift Testing" or "modern testing patterns", (3) test doubles, mocks, stubs, spies, or fixtures, (4) unit tests, integration tests, or snapshot tests, (5) migrating from XCTest to Swift Testing, (6) TDD…

9 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

28 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 19 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 9

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 19

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use Swift Testing framework (@Test, #expect, #require, @Suite) for all new tests, not XCTest.

    line 13
  2. Distinctive:

    Always structure tests with clear Arrange-Act-Assert phases.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Follow F.I.R.S.T. principles: Fast, Isolated, Repeatable, Self-Validating, Timely.

    line 15
  4. Distinctive:

    Use proper test double terminology per Martin Fowler's taxonomy (Dummy, Fake, Stub, Spy, SpyingStub, Mock).

    line 16
  5. Very specific:

    Place fixtures close to models with #if DEBUG, not in test targets.

    line 17
  6. Very specific:

    Place test doubles close to interfaces with #if DEBUG, not in test targets.

    line 18
  7. Distinctive:

    Prefer state verification over behavior verification - simpler, less brittle tests.

    line 19
  8. Very specific:

    Use #expect for soft assertions (continue on failure) and #require for hard assertions (stop on failure).

    line 20
  9. Distinctive:

    When a developer needs testing guidance, follow this decision tree:

    line 24
  10. Very specific:

    Read references/test-organization.md for suites, tags, traits

    line 27
  11. Very specific:

    Read references/async-testing.md for async test patterns

    line 28
  12. Very specific:

    Read references/fixtures.md for fixture patterns and placement

    line 31
  13. Very specific:

    Read references/test-doubles.md for mock/stub/spy patterns

    line 32
  14. Very specific:

    Read references/parameterized-tests.md for parameterized testing

    line 35
  15. Very specific:

    Read references/integration-testing.md for integration test patterns

    line 38
  16. Very specific:

    Read references/snapshot-testing.md for snapshot testing setup

    line 41
  17. Very specific:

    Read references/dump-snapshot-testing.md for text-based snapshot testing

    line 44
  18. Very specific:

    Read references/migration-xctest.md for migration guide

    line 47
  19. Very specific:

    Use references/migration-xctest.md for XCTest to Swift Testing migration

    line 52
  20. Very specific:

    Use references/async-testing.md for async patterns, confirmation, timeouts

    line 54
  21. Very specific:

    Check F.I.R.S.T. principles, use proper mocking per references/test-doubles.md

    line 56
  22. Very specific:

    Use references/fixtures.md for fixture patterns with fixed dates

    line 58
  23. Very specific:

    Use references/parameterized-tests.md for parameterized testing

    line 60
  24. Very specific:

    Use references/integration-testing.md for integration test patterns

    line 62
  25. Distinctive:

    Place test doubles close to the interface, not in test targets:

    line 185
  26. Distinctive:

    Place fixtures close to the model:

    line 219
  27. Distinctive:

    Test names describe behavior, not implementation

    line 288
  28. Distinctive:

    Test doubles are minimal (only stub what's needed)

    line 290

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Swift Testing

Overview

This skill provides expert guidance on Swift Testing, covering the modern Swift Testing framework, test doubles (mocks, stubs, spies), fixtures, integration testing, snapshot testing, and migration from XCTest. Use this skill to help developers write reliable, maintainable tests following F.I.R.S.T. principles and Arrange-Act-Assert patterns.

Agent Behavior Contract (Follow These Rules)

  1. Use Swift Testing framework (@Test, #expect, #require, @Suite) for all new tests, not XCTest.
  2. Always structure tests with clear Arrange-Act-Assert phases.
  3. Follow F.I.R.S.T. principles: Fast, Isolated, Repeatable, Self-Validating, Timely.
  4. Use proper test double terminology per Martin Fowler's taxonomy (Dummy, Fake, Stub, Spy, SpyingStub, Mock).
  5. Place fixtures close to models with #if DEBUG, not in test targets.
  6. Place test doubles close to interfaces with #if DEBUG, not in test targets.
  7. Prefer state verification over behavior verification - simpler, less brittle tests.
  8. Use #expect for soft assertions (continue on failure) and #require for hard assertions (stop on failure).

Quick Decision Tree

When a developer needs testing guidance, follow this decision tree:

  1. Starting fresh with Swift Testing?
    • Read references/test-organization.md for suites, tags, traits
    • Read references/async-testing.md for async test patterns
  2. Need to create test data?
    • Read references/fixtures.md for fixture patterns and placement
    • Read references/test-doubles.md for mock/stub/spy patterns
  3. Testing multiple inputs?
    • Read references/parameterized-tests.md for parameterized testing
  4. Testing module interactions?
    • Read references/integration-testing.md for integration test patterns
  5. Testing UI for regressions?
    • Read references/snapshot-testing.md for snapshot testing setup
  6. Testing data structures or state?
    • Read references/dump-snapshot-testing.md for text-based snapshot testing
  7. Migrating from XCTest?
    • Read references/migration-xctest.md for migration guide

Triage-First Playbook (Common Errors -> Next Best Move)

  • "XCTAssertEqual is unavailable" / need to modernize tests
    • Use references/migration-xctest.md for XCTest to Swift Testing migration
  • Need to test async code
    • Use references/async-testing.md for async patterns, confirmation, timeouts
  • Tests are slow or flaky
    • Check F.I.R.S.T. principles, use proper mocking per references/test-doubles.md
  • Need deterministic test data
    • Use references/fixtures.md for fixture patterns with fixed dates
  • Need to test multiple scenarios efficiently
    • Use references/parameterized-tests.md for parameterized testing
  • Need to verify component interactions
    • Use references/integration-testing.md for integration test patterns

Core Syntax

Basic Test

import Testing

@Test func basicTest() {
    #expect(1 + 1 == 2)
}

Test with Description

@Test("Adding items increases cart count")
func addItem() {
    let cart = Cart()
    cart.add(item)
    #expect(cart.count == 1)
}

Async Test

@Test func asyncOperation() async throws {
    let result = try await service.fetch()
    #expect(result.isValid)
}

Arrange-Act-Assert Pattern

Structure every test with clear phases:

@Test func calculateTotal() {
    // Given
    let cart = ShoppingCart()
    cart.add(Item(price: 10))
    cart.add(Item(price: 20))

    // When
    let total = cart.calculateTotal()

    // Then
    #expect(total == 30)
}

Assertions

#expect - Soft Assertion

Continues test execution after failure:

@Test func multipleExpectations() {
    let user = User(name: "Alice", age: 30)
    #expect(user.name == "Alice")  // If fails, test continues
    #expect(user.age == 30)        // This still runs
}

#require - Hard Assertion

Stops test execution on failure:

@Test func requireExample() throws {
    let user = try #require(fetchUser())  // Stops if nil
    #expect(user.name == "Alice")
}

Error Testing

@Test func throwsError() {
    #expect(throws: ValidationError.self) {
        try validate(invalidInput)
    }
}

@Test func throwsSpecificError() {
    #expect(throws: ValidationError.emptyField) {
        try validate("")
    }
}

F.I.R.S.T. Principles

PrincipleDescriptionApplication
FastTests execute in millisecondsMock expensive operations
IsolatedTests don't depend on each otherFresh instance per test
RepeatableSame result every timeMock dates, network, external deps
Self-ValidatingAuto-report pass/failUse #expect, never rely on print()
TimelyWrite tests alongside codeUse parameterized tests for edge cases

Test Double Quick Reference

Per Martin Fowler's definition:

TypePurposeVerification
DummyFill parameters, never usedN/A
FakeWorking implementation with shortcutsState
StubProvides canned answersState
SpyRecords calls for verificationState
SpyingStubStub + Spy combined (most common)State
MockPre-programmed expectations, self-verifiesBehavior

Important: What Swift community calls "Mock" is usually a SpyingStub.

For detailed patterns, see references/test-doubles.md.

Test Double Placement

Place test doubles close to the interface, not in test targets:

// In PersonalRecordsCore-Interface/Sources/...

public protocol PersonalRecordsRepositoryProtocol: Sendable {
    func getAll() async throws -> [PersonalRecord]
    func save(_ record: PersonalRecord) async throws
}

#if DEBUG
public final class PersonalRecordsRepositorySpyingStub: PersonalRecordsRepositoryProtocol {
    // Spy: Captured calls
    public private(set) var savedRecords: [PersonalRecord] = []

    // Stub: Configurable responses
    public var recordsToReturn: [PersonalRecord] = []
    public var errorToThrow: Error?

    public func getAll() async throws -> [PersonalRecord] {
        if let error = errorToThrow { throw error }
        return recordsToReturn
    }

    public func save(_ record: PersonalRecord) async throws {
        if let error = errorToThrow { throw error }
        savedRecords.append(record)
    }
}
#endif

Fixtures

Place fixtures close to the model:

// In Sources/Models/PersonalRecord.swift

public struct PersonalRecord: Equatable, Sendable {
    public let id: UUID
    public let weight: Double
    // ...
}

#if DEBUG
extension PersonalRecord {
    public static func fixture(
        id: UUID = UUID(),
        weight: Double = 100.0
        // ... defaults for all properties
    ) -> PersonalRecord {
        PersonalRecord(id: id, weight: weight)
    }
}
#endif

For detailed patterns, see references/fixtures.md.

Test Pyramid

        +-------------+
        |   UI Tests  |  5%  - End-to-end flows
        |   (E2E)     |
        +-------------+
        | Integration |  15% - Module interactions
        |    Tests    |
        +-------------+
        |    Unit     |  80% - Individual components
        |    Tests    |
        +-------------+

Reference Files

Load these files as needed for specific topics:

  • test-organization.md - Suites, tags, traits, parallel execution
  • parameterized-tests.md - Testing multiple inputs efficiently
  • async-testing.md - Async patterns, confirmation, timeouts, cancellation
  • migration-xctest.md - Complete XCTest to Swift Testing migration guide
  • test-doubles.md - Complete taxonomy with examples (Dummy, Fake, Stub, Spy, SpyingStub, Mock)
  • fixtures.md - Fixture patterns, placement, and best practices
  • integration-testing.md - Module interaction testing patterns
  • snapshot-testing.md - UI regression testing with SnapshotTesting library
  • dump-snapshot-testing.md - Text-based snapshot testing for data structures

Best Practices Summary

  1. Use Swift Testing for new tests - Modern syntax, better features
  2. Follow Arrange-Act-Assert - Clear test structure
  3. Apply F.I.R.S.T. principles - Fast, Isolated, Repeatable, Self-Validating, Timely
  4. Place fixtures near models - With #if DEBUG guards
  5. Place test doubles near interfaces - With #if DEBUG guards
  6. Prefer state verification - Simpler, less brittle than behavior verification
  7. Use parameterized tests - For testing multiple inputs efficiently
  8. Follow test pyramid - 80% unit, 15% integration, 5% UI

Verification Checklist (When You Write Tests)

  • Tests follow Arrange-Act-Assert pattern
  • Test names describe behavior, not implementation
  • Fixtures use sensible defaults, not random values
  • Test doubles are minimal (only stub what's needed)
  • Async tests use proper patterns (async/await, confirmation)
  • Tests are fast (mock expensive operations)
  • Tests are isolated (no shared state)
  • Tests are repeatable (no flaky date/time dependencies)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.