write-clean-tests
Skill7 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when writing or reviewing tests — F.I.R.S.T. properties, one concept per test, state coverage not line coverage, and a regression test for every bug fix.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- VelimirMueller/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- VelimirMueller/claude-skills★ 7100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository156 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/swift/swiftui-design-principles/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/swift/ios-code-audit/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/swift/swift-focusengine-pro/llms.txtllms.txt
- build-llm-seamSkill
- build-mcp-serverSkill
- build-rag-pipelineSkill
- secure-llm-featuresSkill
- set-up-llm-evalsSkill
- build-nextjs-backendSkill
- build-supabase-edge-functionSkill
- configure-backend-testsSkill
- design-http-apiSkill
- harden-backendSkill
- scaffold-fastapi-serviceSkill
- scaffold-go-serviceSkill
- scaffold-hono-serviceSkill
- secure-supabase-rlsSkill
- set-up-backend-authSkill
- set-up-background-jobsSkill
- set-up-databaseSkill
- set-up-nextjs-supabase-authSkill
- set-up-observabilitySkill
- set-up-supabaseSkill
- build-cliSkill
- release-cliSkill
- set-up-dev-toolchainSkill
- audit-securitySkill
- audit-toolchainSkill
- extend-skillsetSkill
- promote-releaseSkill
- set-up-stack-profileSkill
- write-commit-messagesSkill
- write-pull-requestsSkill
- analyze-complexitySkill
- apply-algorithmsSkill
- apply-design-patternsSkill
- apply-design-principlesSkill
- apply-solidSkill
- choose-data-structureSkill
- debug-systematicallySkill
- enforce-dependency-ruleSkill
- refactor-safelySkill
- slice-and-estimateSkill
- write-readable-codeSkill
- clean-frontend-scaffoldingSkill
- configure-accessibilitySkill
- configure-analyticsSkill
- configure-ciSkill
- configure-error-trackingSkill
- configure-lintingSkill
- configure-test-stackSkill
- configure-typescriptSkill
- create-moduleSkill
- optimize-performanceSkill
- scaffold-frontend-projectSkill
- set-up-authSkill
- set-up-design-systemSkill
- set-up-document-headSkill
- set-up-error-boundariesSkill
- set-up-feature-flagsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 26
Read the tests for three failures: tests that mirror the implementation (they break on every refactor and catch nothing), tests with …
- Distinctive: line 34
Test the public behaviour, not the private shape.
- Very specific: line 36
Use the arrange/act/assert shape.
- Distinctive: line 49
Use real data (and a synthetic edge case) over an exhaustive mock of reality.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Write Clean Tests
Tests are first-class code: they must be as readable as production and must fail for the right reason. Production testing boundary is set by engineering-principles.md.
F.I.R.S.T.
- Fast — a slow suite stops being run. Keep unit tests in memory; push the slow ones out of the unit layer.
- Independent — one test must not depend on another's order or state; run them in any order.
- Repeatable — same result in any environment; no flakiness from time, network or shared state.
- Self-validating — a boolean pass/fail, never a human reading the output.
- Timely — written just before or with the production code, not weeks later.
1. Audit (change nothing)
cat .claude/stack-profile.md 2>/dev/null | head -20
find . \( -name "*_test.*" -o -name "*_spec.*" -o -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" -o -name "*Test.*" -o -name "*Tests.*" -o -name "test_*.*" -o -path "*__tests__*" \) 2>/dev/null | head -20Read the tests for three failures: tests that mirror the implementation (they break on every refactor and catch nothing), tests with several unrelated asserts (one failure hides another), and tests that assert internals instead of behaviour.
2. One concept per test
- One assert per behaviour, one concept per test. A test named "it works" asserts nothing; name it "returns zero when the list is empty".
- Test the public behaviour, not the private shape. A test coupled to internals fails when the code improves.
- Use the arrange/act/assert shape; keep the arrange minimal so the reader sees the one thing under test.
3. State coverage over line coverage
- Cover the states and transitions that pay (the boundary conditions, the error paths, the money path), not a percentage. A line covered is not a bug caught.
- Saboteur-test the tests: break the production code and confirm a test fails — a test that cannot fail tests nothing.
4. A regression test for every fix
- A bug is a missing test. Write the test that fails on the old code, then the fix — the test is the proof the bug cannot return.
- Use real data (and a synthetic edge case) over an exhaustive mock of reality.
Verify
pnpm test (or the profile's runner) is green, each test states one behaviour, and breaking the code
under test fails exactly one test with a message that names the cause. State the new coverage in the note.
When to deviate
- A prototype with a one-week life: a couple of smoke tests, not a full suite.
- A bug cheap to fix and loud (an internal dashboard): a thin regression test is enough.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

