audit-toolchain
Skill7 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when asked whether a repo's tooling is current, before a toolchain migration, or when a dependency or build step feels dated. Compares the repo to tech-radar.md and the stack profile and reports gaps with cost; changes nothing unless asked.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- VelimirMueller/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- VelimirMueller/claude-skills★ 7100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository156 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/swift/swiftui-design-principles/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/swift/ios-code-audit/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/swift/swift-focusengine-pro/llms.txtllms.txt
- build-llm-seamSkill
- build-mcp-serverSkill
- build-rag-pipelineSkill
- secure-llm-featuresSkill
- set-up-llm-evalsSkill
- build-nextjs-backendSkill
- build-supabase-edge-functionSkill
- configure-backend-testsSkill
- design-http-apiSkill
- harden-backendSkill
- scaffold-fastapi-serviceSkill
- scaffold-go-serviceSkill
- scaffold-hono-serviceSkill
- secure-supabase-rlsSkill
- set-up-backend-authSkill
- set-up-background-jobsSkill
- set-up-databaseSkill
- set-up-nextjs-supabase-authSkill
- set-up-observabilitySkill
- set-up-supabaseSkill
- build-cliSkill
- release-cliSkill
- set-up-dev-toolchainSkill
- audit-securitySkill
- extend-skillsetSkill
- promote-releaseSkill
- set-up-stack-profileSkill
- write-commit-messagesSkill
- write-pull-requestsSkill
- analyze-complexitySkill
- apply-algorithmsSkill
- apply-design-patternsSkill
- apply-design-principlesSkill
- apply-solidSkill
- choose-data-structureSkill
- debug-systematicallySkill
- enforce-dependency-ruleSkill
- refactor-safelySkill
- slice-and-estimateSkill
- write-clean-testsSkill
- write-readable-codeSkill
- clean-frontend-scaffoldingSkill
- configure-accessibilitySkill
- configure-analyticsSkill
- configure-ciSkill
- configure-error-trackingSkill
- configure-lintingSkill
- configure-test-stackSkill
- configure-typescriptSkill
- create-moduleSkill
- optimize-performanceSkill
- scaffold-frontend-projectSkill
- set-up-authSkill
- set-up-design-systemSkill
- set-up-document-headSkill
- set-up-error-boundariesSkill
- set-up-feature-flagsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Read-only report: where the repo differs from the Adopt rows of tech-radar.md and from its own stack profile.
- Very specific: line 45
Check these concerns, in order: runtime (Node/Go/Python/Rust line), runtime manager, package manager, bundler, linter/formatter, type …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Audit Toolchain
Read-only report: where the repo differs from the Adopt rows of tech-radar.md and from its own stack profile. Migration cost scale and skill mapping: migration-map.md.
1. Audit (change nothing)
cat .claude/stack-profile.md 2>/dev/null
ls pnpm-lock.yaml package-lock.json bun.lock bun.lockb yarn.lock uv.lock go.mod Cargo.toml mise.toml .tool-versions .nvmrc justfile Makefile 2>/dev/null
cat package.json 2>/dev/null | head -80
grep -E '^(go|toolchain) ' go.mod 2>/dev/null; grep -E 'requires-python|\[tool\.(ruff|uv|mypy|pyright)' pyproject.toml 2>/dev/null; grep -E '^(edition|rust-version)' Cargo.toml 2>/dev/null
ls .github/workflows 2>/dev/null; grep -hE 'uses:|node-version|go-version|python-version' .github/workflows/*.y*ml 2>/dev/null | head -40
ls biome.json* eslint.config.* .eslintrc* .prettierrc* .oxlintrc.json .golangci.y*ml ruff.toml 2>/dev/nullProfile present: use it as the intended stack and report drift from it. Absent: detect per the table in stack-profile.md; if the answer is ambiguous and changes the report, ask one question and suggest set-up-stack-profile.
2. Decide
- Everything matches Adopt rows → print "already in place" with the checked date and stop.
- Else continue.
3. Verify the radar is fresh
The radar carries a date. If it is older than 90 days, or any row you will cite is unverified, re-check that row live per version-protocol.md first (npm view <pkg> version, curl PyPI JSON, gh api repos/<o>/<r>/releases/latest). Report the real latest, not the radar's copy.
4. Compare
For each tool the repo uses, find its row and classify:
| Finding | Meaning |
| Adopt-gap | The repo lacks the Adopt choice for a concern (no formatter; Node pinned two LTS lines behind; no runtime manager file). |
| Hold-in-use | The repo uses a Hold item (ESLint+Prettier in a new repo, Terraform BUSL, an end-of-life Node). |
| Behind | Right tool, old major (versions from step 3). |
| Drift | The repo differs from its own profile (profile says Biome; repo runs ESLint). |
| Fine | Matches. Not listed. |
| Unlisted | Tool not on the radar: report it with no ring; do not guess. |
Check these concerns, in order: runtime (Node/Go/Python/Rust line), runtime manager, package manager, bundler, linter/formatter, type checker, test runner, CI pins (actions by SHA), task runner, observability seam, IaC.
5. Report
One table, highest value first:
| # | Finding | Evidence (path:line) | Radar ring | Cost S/M/L | Fixed by | Risk |
- Cost: S under half a day, M one to three days, L more than three days or touching many files (scale in migration-map.md).
- Fixed by: the skill that performs the migration, from the map. If no skill covers it, write "no skill" and offer
extend-skillset. - Risk: what could break and how to roll back.
Then a short "Do first" list (at most three) chosen by value over cost, and a "Leave alone" list for Hold items where migration cost outweighs the benefit (with the reason). Respect the principle "consistency beats local optimum" from engineering-principles.md: a half-migrated repo is worse than an old one.
6. Act only when asked
Changing anything needs a go-ahead from the user per item. When approved, run the mapped skill; one migration per PR. Never upgrade a user-pinned version unasked.
7. Verify
The report ran only read commands: git status --porcelain is unchanged. Every cited line number exists (sed -n '<n>p' <file>). Every "latest" has a command and a date behind it.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

