ai-visibility-tracker
Skill0 starsChanged 39 days agoMITView on GitHub
Track how often ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews mention or cite the user's brand versus competitors, using SEOsorted's tracked buyer prompts and scans. Use when the user asks about AI visibility, GEO, AEO, LLM visibility, share of voice in AI answers, whether ChatGPT recommends them, or "are we showing up in AI search".
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- khadinakbarlabs/ai-visibility-trackertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- andr3wperez/ai-visibility-trackertheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- hacktheseo/wordpress-seo-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 21, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- hacktheseo/wordpress-seo-skills★ 2same name
- andr3wperez/ai-visibility-tracker★ 1same name
- khadinakbarlabs/ai-visibility-tracker★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository36 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-citation-outreachSkill
- ai-crawler-analyticsSkill
- backlink-outreachSkill
- backlinksSkill
- brand-voice-setupSkill
- bulk-content-runSkill
- cannibalization-checkSkill
- comparison-pagesSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- content-calendarSkill
- content-refreshSkill
- domain-authority-checkSkill
- find-questionsSkill
- keyword-researchSkill
- link-building-playbooksSkill
- link-reclamationSkill
- llms-txt-generatorSkill
- page-seo-auditSkill
- publish-to-cmsSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- seo-master-planSkill
- seo-reportSkill
- seosortedSkill
- serp-analysisSkill
- site-settingsSkill
- statistics-pageSkill
- technical-audit-reportSkill
- technical-seo-checkSkill
- topic-clustersSkill
- update-and-republishSkill
- write-articleSkill
- youtube-channel-auditSkill
- youtube-citation-strategySkill
- youtube-creator-outreachSkill
- youtube-keyword-researchSkill
- youtube-outliersSkill
The file
Files
AI visibility tracker
Steps
track_ai_search_visibilityoperation: "summary". If there is no data yet, go to step 3.operation: "prompts"to see which buyer questions are tracked. Good prompts are what a buyer actually types: "best X for Y", "X vs Y", "how do I solve Z". Propose additions for gaps (each product line, each competitor comparison, the main problem) and add withoperation: "add_prompts"(EDITOR) — each prompt is{text, topic}, up to 25 per call. The plan sets how many prompts can be tracked; respect the limit the tool reports.operation: "scan"to run a fresh scan (one AI-visibility scan credit). Pollcheck_job_status.- Present:
- Visibility score and share of voice against each competitor.
- Per engine: mentioned / cited / absent.
- Prompts where competitors appear and the brand does not — the gap list.
- Pages of the site that engines already cite (defend these).
Why engines skip the site
operation: "readiness"— AI-readiness score out of 100: robots.txt access for AI crawlers, text visible without JavaScript, backlink strength, JSON-LD on key pages, with a fix brief. Free;refresh: truere-checks in the background.operation: "citations"— third-party pages AI answers cited that name the brand, and whether they link here. Unlinked ones →link-building-playbooks(unlinked mentions).
Next
- Gap prompts →
ai-citation-outreachto find the pages engines cite for them and get mentioned there. - Engines cite video for a topic →
youtube-citation-strategy. - Few AI crawler visits →
ai-crawler-analytics.
Guardrails
AI answers vary run to run. Talk in trends across scans, not single answers. Report "not mentioned" as a finding, never as an error.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

