agentleFS
TheophilusChinomonaTheophilusChinomona/idev/skills/api-contract-validation/SKILL.md

api-contract-validation

Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Discovers and validates API endpoints between frontend and backend. Use after creating or modifying API endpoints, or when investigating FE-BE contract mismatches. Simplified to endpoint discovery; full contract comparison deferred to dedicated tools.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    After creating a new API endpoint (backend) or service function (frontend)

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    When user reports a 404 or data mismatch between FE and BE

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    When asked to "validate API contracts" or "check endpoint alignment"

    line 14
  4. Distinctive:

    Check if the backend route exists

    line 41
  5. Distinctive:

    Check if the frontend has a corresponding service call

    line 42
  6. Distinctive:

    Do NOT assume casing matches — check JSON serializer config

    line 92
  7. Distinctive:

    Do NOT flag Guid→string as a type error — it serializes fine

    line 93
  8. Distinctive:

    Do NOT run full validation after every single file change — run after feature completion

    line 94
  9. Distinctive:

    Do NOT try to validate response shapes — focus on URL and method alignment

    line 95

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

API Contract Validation — Simplified

Purpose

Discover API endpoints on both frontend and backend, and flag obvious mismatches (missing endpoints, wrong HTTP methods, broken URL patterns). This is a lightweight discovery tool, not a full contract comparison engine.

Activation

  • After creating a new API endpoint (backend) or service function (frontend)
  • When user reports a 404 or data mismatch between FE and BE
  • When asked to "validate API contracts" or "check endpoint alignment"

How It Works

Endpoint Discovery

Backend — scan for route definitions:

.NET:     grep for [Route("api/"] or [Http*("  in *.cs
Express:  grep for "app.get|app.post|router.get|router.post" in *.ts/*.js
FastAPI:  grep for "@app.get|@app.post|@router" in *.py
Django:   grep for "path(" in urls.py
Spring:   grep for "@GetMapping|@PostMapping|@RequestMapping" in *.java
Go:       grep for "HandleFunc|Handle|r.GET|r.POST" in *.go

Frontend — scan for API calls:

TS/JS: grep for "api/|/api" in *.service.ts, *.api.ts, api/*.ts
Python: grep for "requests.get|requests.post|httpx" 
Flutter: grep for "http.get|http.post|dio"

Quick Validation

For each discovered endpoint:

  1. Check if the backend route exists
  2. Check if the frontend has a corresponding service call
  3. Flag: missing backend route, missing frontend call, HTTP method mismatch
  4. Report results in a compact table

Phase 1: Discover Endpoints

Scan both sides and build a mapping:

{
  "generated": "YYYY-MM-DD",
  "endpoints": [
    {
      "path": "api/orders/get-all",
      "method": "GET",
      "backend": "path/to/OrdersController.cs",
      "frontend": "path/to/orders.service.ts",
      "status": "aligned|missing-backend|missing-frontend"
    }
  ]
}

Write to .claude/idev/api-contract-validation/cache.json.


Phase 2: Report

API Endpoint Discovery: 12 endpoints found

  ✓ GET  api/orders/get-all      → aligned
  ✓ POST api/orders/create        → aligned
  ✗ GET  api/orders/get-by-key    → missing frontend call
  ✗ POST api/customers/import     → missing backend route

  Summary: 10 aligned, 1 missing-frontend, 1 missing-backend

When to Use Full Contract Comparison

For detailed type/field validation (request/response shapes, DTO alignment), use a dedicated OpenAPI/Swagger tool or generate contracts from code. This skill focuses on URL and method alignment — the most common source of runtime 404s.


Anti-Patterns

  1. Do NOT assume casing matches — check JSON serializer config
  2. Do NOT flag Guid→string as a type error — it serializes fine
  3. Do NOT run full validation after every single file change — run after feature completion
  4. Do NOT try to validate response shapes — focus on URL and method alignment

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.