design-system
Skill0 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Establish or audit a project's design foundations - colour, type, spacing, shape, elevation, motion and core component states - as layered tokens with contrast checked in light and dark. Produces a short reference doc and applies it through the project's own token mechanism.
192 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- caidanw/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Adelie-Squad/solosquadtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- darkweb19/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dmoreq/agent-grimoiretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ahmadvahidi/skill-atlastheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-engine, team-level and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillsetup-engine
Configure the project's game engine and version. Pins the engine in CLAUDE.md, detects knowledge gaps, and populates engine reference docs via WebSearch when the version is beyond the LLM's training data.
Also in 13 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-level
Orchestrate level design team: level-designer + narrative-director + world-builder + art-director + systems-designer + qa-tester for complete area/level creation.
Also in 12 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillcreate-stories
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillstory-done
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
Also in 11 projects that use this
- +2 more from CoralGame
- +6 more from lilangMax
Other versions192 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 192
- nextlevelbuilder/ui-ux-pro-max-skill★ 147ksame name
- getsentry/sentry★ 46ksame name
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- ethereum/ethereum-org-website★ 6ksame name
- langwatch/langwatch★ 5ksame name
- joye61/pic-smaller★ 2.9ksame name
- daveebbelaar/bama★ 1.7ksame name
- reatom/reatom★ 1.4ksame name
- microsoft/power-platform-skills★ 1.1ksame name
182 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- api-designSkill
- auth-designSkill
- copywriteSkill
- data-validationSkill
- dep-auditSkill
- designSkill
- de-slopSkill
- documentationSkill
- observabilitySkill
- perf-checkSkill
- refactorSkill
- resilienceSkill
- retention-auditSkill
- security-auditSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- technical-reviewSkill
- testingSkill
- workflow-auditSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 175 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 32
Ask only what the repo can't answer: audience and mood, brand assets that must be kept (logo colours, fonts), platforms, themes needed …
- Distinctive: line 34
If a look already exists and works, codify it with improvements.
- Distinctive: line 46
Verify (build, light and dark screenshots if a browser is available, leftover hard-coded values).
- Distinctive: line 55
Don't change visual design as a side effect of an audit.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 175 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Establish the visual foundation every later design task builds on. Run once per project, or to recalibrate. Present a draft for approval before writing any file or touching any style.
Modes: Create (no system yet) | Audit (styles exist but are inconsistent) | Extend (add dark mode, density, motion, a new component family). Infer from the repo; ask if unclear.
Related: design consumes the system | accessibility audits the result | de-slop finds generic defaults | copywrite voice.md for a matching verbal voice.
Step 1: Context
Read product docs and any existing design, convention or voice docs. Detect how styling is done: utility CSS config (Tailwind and similar), CSS custom properties, CSS modules, CSS-in-JS theme, a component library theme, or native/platform styles. Express tokens in the project's existing mechanism. Don't add a parallel system.
Step 2: Audit what exists
Count distinct values per category across stylesheets and 5-10 key components:
grep -rhoE '#[0-9a-fA-F]{3,8}\b|rgba?\([^)]*\)|hsla?\([^)]*\)' <src> | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -40
grep -rhoE 'font-size: *[^;]+|border-radius: *[^;]+|box-shadow: *[^;]+' <src> | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -40Adapt the patterns to the stack (utility classes, theme objects). Report the number of distinct colours, font sizes, radii, shadows and spacing values, and the clearest inconsistencies (three greys for muted text, two radii on cards). Those are what the system fixes. Note existing contrast failures.
Step 3: Brief
Ask only what the repo can't answer: audience and mood, brand assets that must be kept (logo colours, fonts), platforms, themes needed (light, dark, both), density (data-heavy tool vs marketing site), accessibility target (default WCAG 2.2 AA).
If a look already exists and works, codify it with improvements; don't replace it with something unrecognisable.
Step 4: Draft the system
Load references/foundations.md (tokens, colour, type, spacing, shape, elevation, motion, layout) and references/components.md (states and patterns). For every colour pairing, run the contrast check in foundations.md and put the results in the draft.
Step 5: Present, refine, save
Load references/output.md. Show the full draft with a swatch or sample for each decision and the contrast results. Refine with the user. After approval:
- Save the reference doc in the project's docs location and add a pointer in its agent or context file.
- Apply the tokens to the project's mechanism. Only with approval, and in batches.
- Verify (build, light and dark screenshots if a browser is available, leftover hard-coded values).
Rules
- Specific values, not "a nice blue".
- Name by role, not value.
action, notblue-600; roles survive palette changes. - Contrast is checked, not assumed, in both themes.
- Restraint is a decision, not a rule. Each extra colour, typeface or radius must earn its place by a distinct job.
- Keep the doc under 150 lines. One nobody reads is worse than none.
- Don't change visual design as a side effect of an audit. Report first.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

