agentleFS
System-Error-WorldwideSystem-Error-Worldwide/the-loop/.agents/skills/health-check/SKILL.md

health-check

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Diagnose an observed symptom with reproducible evidence and return a bounded lifecycle entry packet without silently fixing it. Use when something appears broken, missing, stale or unhealthy and the cause must be established before any repair.

21 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use testing.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • NVIDIASkill

    testing

    Run Python and Rust tests for physicsnemo-curator using uv + pytest with coverage reporting via pytest-cov, and cargo-nextest for Rust tests. Includes benchmark workflows with pytest-benchmark and criterion.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use when a user reports breakage, an expected surface is unavailable, a check begins failing or current health must be established for a …

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    Read authority plus any exact authority and lease required to persist evidence or issues.

    line 25
  3. Very specific:

    run ID, feeder health-check, track and declared asset.

    line 46
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask whether the symptom reproduces, whether the proposed cause predicts the observation and whether a narrower competing cause fits the …

    line 67

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Health check

Purpose

Provide the complete bundled fallback for feeder.health_check. React to an observed symptom, establish what is actually failing and feed bounded evidence into the lifecycle without silently fixing the asset.

Use when

Use when a user reports breakage, an expected surface is unavailable, a check begins failing or current health must be established for a named surface.

Required inputs

  • Validated run ID or a new-run request, declared asset, code or non-code track and observed symptom.
  • Requested surface, expected behavior and available environment or source state.
  • Read authority plus any exact authority and lease required to persist evidence or issues.
  • Current done gate, known issues, budgets and stop controls.
  • Requested diagnostic capability and route decision.

Reject an unbounded “check everything” request unless it is narrowed to an enumerated surface and coverage limit.

Procedure

  1. Restate the observed symptom and the exact surface under review.
  2. Establish live or supplied state using read-only checks first; name inaccessible coverage.
  3. Derive the smallest reproductions that distinguish the symptom from nearby causes.
  4. Record command, file, source, visual or manual evidence with truthful outcomes.
  5. Attempt to reproduce and refute each candidate defect.
  6. Open an issue for every surviving implementation defect; do not change the asset.
  7. Route the bounded entry packet to Strategize, Test or the issue ledger as appropriate.
  8. Report the bundled fallback source and the precise reason any installed provider did not qualify.

Output contract

Return:

  • run ID, feeder health-check, track and declared asset;
  • observed symptom, inspected surface and coverage classification;
  • reproductions, evidence references and surviving issue references;
  • ruled-out causes and unverified areas;
  • bounded entry packet with target stage, done gate and required authority;
  • gate state, next safe action or halt reason.

Evidence gate

A diagnosis needs reproducible evidence tying the symptom to the claimed cause. File existence or process presence alone is not health proof. Sampled checks remain labeled sampled, and inaccessible checks remain UNVERIFIED.

Track requirements

For the code track, preserve repository identity, worktree state, relevant runtime behavior and executable reproductions. For the non-code track, preserve source access, factuality, format or render observations and review gaps. Neither track converts observation into mutation.

Safety and authority

Health-check is diagnostic. It does not own lifecycle advancement and proceeds without silently fixing a defect. Read-only checks must not mutate local or external state. Evidence or issue writes still require runtime preflight and a valid lease.

Self-refutation

Ask whether the symptom reproduces, whether the proposed cause predicts the observation and whether a narrower competing cause fits the same evidence. Remove findings that do not survive.

Halt conditions

Halt when the requested surface cannot be identified, state is inaccessible, a check would exceed authority, the namespace changes, a stop is detected, evidence cannot distinguish causes, or the request expands beyond the declared boundary. Return an entry packet rather than green.

Core execution does not require network access or the source checkout. The links below are optional public documentation.

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.