agentleFS
teleriktelerik/observability-skills/skills/health-check/SKILL.md

health-check

Skill1 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

Verify that a project's Progress Observability setup is wired up correctly — connection, key scope, whether traces are flowing, and how deep the instrumentation goes. Use when the user asks "is my observability set up right", "why am I seeing no traces", "check my connection", "is my data flowing", "verify my setup", or is running the plugin for the first time.

  • Reads credentials

21 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use testing.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • NVIDIASkill

    testing

    Run Python and Rust tests for physicsnemo-curator using uv + pytest with coverage reporting via pytest-cov, and cargo-nextest for Rust tests. Includes benchmark workflows with pytest-benchmark and criterion.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read references/mcp.md first for the tool contract, the key scopes, and the 72h window.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Run a fixed diagnostic sequence that turns "it's not working" into a specific cause, then report a short status checklist with the exact …

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    If the app uses a framework (LangChain, LlamaIndex, Haystack, CrewAI, LangGraph) but every trace is a bare LLM call with no workflow/task …

    line 48
  4. Distinctive:

    Never write back to the platform — the server is read-only.

    line 75

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Observability health check

Read references/mcp.md first for the tool contract, the key scopes, and the 72h window. This skill is read-only and uses metadata tools only — no trace content, so no injection surface. If that file isn't present (this skill was lifted out on its own), ask the user for the plugin's references/mcp.md, or fall back to the hard rules: every tool is read-only, observation queries cap at a 72-hour window, and a Metadata-only key exposes 7 tools while a With-content key exposes all 9.

<!-- copilot:start -->

Run a fixed diagnostic sequence that turns "it's not working" into a specific cause, then report a short status checklist with the exact fix for anything red. Most signals are ambiguous alone — an empty trace list has several possible causes — so run the steps in order and interpret them together, each one narrowing the fault.

Workflow

  1. Connection & key scope. Confirm the progress-observability MCP tools are available to you, then identify the scope by presence of the content tools: get_observation_details_with_content present = With-content key (9 tools); absent = Metadata-only key (7 tools). Report which scope is active and what it implies — e.g. eval-from-trace needs a With-content key to quote real examples. If the tools are missing or every call returns an auth error, the server didn't authenticate: the fix is OBSERVABILITY_MCP_API_KEY / the .mcp.json key, not the platform. (For a raw check outside the agent, the connectivity curl is in references/mcp.md.)
  2. Recent data. list_observations, type: "traces", last 24h, small limit.
    • Non-empty — report the count, the services seen, and the most recent timestamp (freshness).
    • Empty at 24h — widen to the 72h max and retry. Present at 72h but not 24h means traffic is stale (nothing recent — the SDK stopped or the app went quiet).
    • Empty at 72h — no data. Separate the causes rather than guessing: no instrumentation running, the wrong key/project, or all traffic older than the 72h window.
  3. Instrumentation depth. get_observation_details (metadata, include_children) on a couple of the most recent traces — it's available on both key scopes. Children with real span types (tool calls, retrieval, generations) is healthy. Traces with no children mean the SDK is capturing top-level spans only — flag it, since trace-triage and coverage-gaps will be blind to sub-spans.

    If the app uses a framework (LangChain, LlamaIndex, Haystack, CrewAI, LangGraph) but every trace is a bare LLM call with no workflow/task structure, name the most likely cause rather than just reporting thinness: in Python, the framework instrumentor is gated on a distribution name, so depending on langchain-core or llama-index-core without the langchain / llama-index meta package disables it silently. Measured: adding that one line took a fixture from 2 spans to 8, and another from 1 to 17. Suggest /instrument-agent to fix it.

  4. Evaluations. list_evaluation_tasks, then get_evaluation_scores on a few. None configured is fine — but note that coverage-gaps and any eval monitoring need at least one judge, and offer generate-eval. Tasks that exist but have no recent scores are dormant (defined, not running).
  5. Report a compact checklist — one line per check, a status marker, and for anything not green, the single concrete next step. Keep it scannable:

    ✓ Connection      reachable, auth OK
    ● Key scope       Metadata only (7 tools, no content tools) — eval-from-trace needs a With-content key
    ✓ Data freshness  312 traces / 24h, latest 4m ago, 3 services
    ● Instrumentation 2 of 5 sampled traces have no child spans — check SDK span nesting
    ✓ Evaluations     4 tasks, 3 scored in the last 24h

    End with the one highest-priority fix if anything is red, or a clear all-clear.

Never write back to the platform — the server is read-only.

<!-- copilot:end -->

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.