health-check
Skill1 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub
Verify that a project's Progress Observability setup is wired up correctly — connection, key scope, whether traces are flowing, and how deep the instrumentation goes. Use when the user asks "is my observability set up right", "why am I seeing no traces", "check my connection", "is my data flowing", "verify my setup", or is running the plugin for the first time.
- Reads credentials
21 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- allanninal/claude-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- hosaypeng/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Resgrid/Coretheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- kubehan/PromAItheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- zylos-ai/zylos-coretheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use testing.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
NVIDIASkilltesting
Run Python and Rust tests for physicsnemo-curator using uv + pytest with coverage reporting via pytest-cov, and cargo-nextest for Rust tests. Includes benchmark workflows with pytest-benchmark and criterion.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 21
- zylos-ai/zylos-core★ 1.2ksame name
- codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit★ 808same name
- bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills★ 589same name
- Resgrid/Core★ 238same name
- kubehan/PromAI★ 129same name
- hoangsonww/AI-Agents-Orchestrator★ 83same name
- fagemx/edda★ 36same name
- weklund/fiduciary★ 10same name
- aws-samples/sample-aws-ops-skills-for-agents★ 8same name
- link7373/agentic-bi-team★ 4same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- build-custom-agentSkill
- build-template-agentSkill
- cost-reportSkill
- coverage-gapsSkill
- generate-evalSkill
- instrument-agentSkill
- trace-triageSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 8
Read references/mcp.md first for the tool contract, the key scopes, and the 72h window.
- Distinctive: line 16
Run a fixed diagnostic sequence that turns "it's not working" into a specific cause, then report a short status checklist with the exact …
- Distinctive: line 48
If the app uses a framework (LangChain, LlamaIndex, Haystack, CrewAI, LangGraph) but every trace is a bare LLM call with no workflow/task …
- Distinctive: line 75
Never write back to the platform — the server is read-only.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Observability health check
Read references/mcp.md first for the tool contract, the key scopes, and the
72h window. This skill is read-only and uses metadata tools only — no trace content,
so no injection surface. If that file isn't present (this skill was lifted out on
its own), ask the user for the plugin's references/mcp.md, or fall back to the
hard rules: every tool is read-only, observation queries cap at a 72-hour window,
and a Metadata-only key exposes 7 tools while a With-content key exposes all 9.
<!-- copilot:start -->Run a fixed diagnostic sequence that turns "it's not working" into a specific cause, then report a short status checklist with the exact fix for anything red. Most signals are ambiguous alone — an empty trace list has several possible causes — so run the steps in order and interpret them together, each one narrowing the fault.
Workflow
- Connection & key scope. Confirm the
progress-observabilityMCP tools are available to you, then identify the scope by presence of the content tools:get_observation_details_with_contentpresent = With-content key (9 tools); absent = Metadata-only key (7 tools). Report which scope is active and what it implies — e.g.eval-from-traceneeds a With-content key to quote real examples. If the tools are missing or every call returns an auth error, the server didn't authenticate: the fix isOBSERVABILITY_MCP_API_KEY/ the.mcp.jsonkey, not the platform. (For a raw check outside the agent, the connectivitycurlis inreferences/mcp.md.) - Recent data.
list_observations,type: "traces", last 24h, smalllimit.- Non-empty — report the count, the services seen, and the most recent timestamp (freshness).
- Empty at 24h — widen to the 72h max and retry. Present at 72h but not 24h means traffic is stale (nothing recent — the SDK stopped or the app went quiet).
- Empty at 72h — no data. Separate the causes rather than guessing: no instrumentation running, the wrong key/project, or all traffic older than the 72h window.
Instrumentation depth.
get_observation_details(metadata,include_children) on a couple of the most recent traces — it's available on both key scopes. Children with real span types (tool calls, retrieval, generations) is healthy. Traces with no children mean the SDK is capturing top-level spans only — flag it, sincetrace-triageandcoverage-gapswill be blind to sub-spans.If the app uses a framework (LangChain, LlamaIndex, Haystack, CrewAI, LangGraph) but every trace is a bare LLM call with no workflow/task structure, name the most likely cause rather than just reporting thinness: in Python, the framework instrumentor is gated on a distribution name, so depending on
langchain-coreorllama-index-corewithout thelangchain/llama-indexmeta package disables it silently. Measured: adding that one line took a fixture from 2 spans to 8, and another from 1 to 17. Suggest/instrument-agentto fix it.- Evaluations.
list_evaluation_tasks, thenget_evaluation_scoreson a few. None configured is fine — but note thatcoverage-gapsand any eval monitoring need at least one judge, and offergenerate-eval. Tasks that exist but have no recent scores are dormant (defined, not running). Report a compact checklist — one line per check, a status marker, and for anything not green, the single concrete next step. Keep it scannable:
✓ Connection reachable, auth OK ● Key scope Metadata only (7 tools, no content tools) — eval-from-trace needs a With-content key ✓ Data freshness 312 traces / 24h, latest 4m ago, 3 services ● Instrumentation 2 of 5 sampled traces have no child spans — check SDK span nesting ✓ Evaluations 4 tasks, 3 scored in the last 24hEnd with the one highest-priority fix if anything is red, or a clear all-clear.
Never write back to the platform — the server is read-only.
<!-- copilot:end -->Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

